Arosio Beatrice, Guerini Franca Rosa, Voshaar Richard C Oude, Aprahamian Ivan
Geriatric Unit, Fondazione Ca' Granda, IRCCS Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Feb 12;15:626906. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.626906. eCollection 2021.
Major depressive disorder (MDD) affects millions of people worldwide and is a leading cause of disability. Several theories have been proposed to explain its pathological mechanisms, and the "neurotrophin hypothesis of depression" involves one of the most relevant pathways. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is an important neurotrophin, and it has been extensively investigated in both experimental models and clinical studies of MDD. Robust empirical findings have indicated an association between increased BDNF gene expression and peripheral concentration with improved neuronal plasticity and neurogenesis. Additionally, several studies have indicated the blunt expression of BDNF in carriers of the Val66Met gene polymorphism and lower blood BDNF (serum or plasma) levels in depressed individuals. Clinical trials have yielded mixed results with different treatment options, peripheral blood BDNF measurement techniques, and time of observation. Previous meta-analyses of MDD treatment have indicated that antidepressants and electroconvulsive therapy showed higher levels of blood BDNF after treatment but not with physical exercise, psychotherapy, or direct current stimulation. Moreover, the rapid-acting antidepressant ketamine has presented an early increase in blood BDNF concentration. Although evidence has pointed to increased levels of BDNF after antidepressant therapy, several factors, such as heterogeneous results, low sample size, publication bias, and different BDNF measurements (serum or plasma), pose a challenge in the interpretation of the relation between peripheral blood BDNF and MDD. These potential gaps in the literature have not been properly addressed in previous narrative reviews. In this review, current evidence regarding BDNF function, genetics and epigenetics, expression, and results from clinical trials is summarized, putting the literature into a translational perspective on MDD. In general, blood BDNF cannot be recommended for use as a biomarker in clinical practice. Moreover, future studies should expand the evidence with larger samples, use the serum or serum: whole blood concentration of BDNF as a more accurate measure of peripheral BDNF, and compare its change upon different treatment modalities of MDD.
重度抑郁症(MDD)影响着全球数百万人,是导致残疾的主要原因之一。人们提出了几种理论来解释其病理机制,其中“抑郁症的神经营养因子假说”涉及最相关的途径之一。脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)是一种重要的神经营养因子,在MDD的实验模型和临床研究中都得到了广泛研究。有力的实证研究结果表明,BDNF基因表达增加和外周浓度升高与神经元可塑性和神经发生改善之间存在关联。此外,多项研究表明,Val66Met基因多态性携带者中BDNF表达减弱,抑郁症患者的血液BDNF(血清或血浆)水平较低。不同的治疗方案、外周血BDNF测量技术和观察时间的临床试验结果不一。先前对MDD治疗的荟萃分析表明,抗抑郁药和电休克治疗后血液BDNF水平较高,但体育锻炼、心理治疗或直流电刺激则不然。此外,速效抗抑郁药氯胺酮使血液BDNF浓度早期升高。尽管有证据表明抗抑郁治疗后BDNF水平升高,但结果异质性、样本量小、发表偏倚以及不同的BDNF测量方法(血清或血浆)等几个因素,给解释外周血BDNF与MDD之间的关系带来了挑战。这些文献中的潜在空白在以往的叙述性综述中并未得到妥善解决。在本综述中,总结了关于BDNF功能、遗传学和表观遗传学、表达以及临床试验结果的当前证据,从转化医学角度审视了有关MDD的文献。总体而言,不建议在临床实践中将血液BDNF用作生物标志物。此外,未来的研究应通过更大的样本扩大证据,使用BDNF的血清或血清:全血浓度作为外周BDNF更准确的测量指标,并比较其在MDD不同治疗方式下的变化。