Baranov Nikolaj S, Slootmans Cettela, van Workum Frans, Klarenbeek Bastiaan R, Schoon Yvonne, Rosman Camiel
Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands.
Department of Geriatrics, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen 6525GA, the Netherlands.
World J Gastrointest Oncol. 2021 Feb 15;13(2):131-146. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i2.131.
An increasing number of older patients is undergoing curative, surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. Previous meta-analyses have shown that older patients suffered from more postoperative morbidity and mortality compared to younger patients, which may lead to patient selection based on age. However, only studies including patients that underwent open esophagectomy were included. Therefore, it remains unknown whether there is an association between age and outcome in patients undergoing minimally invasive esophagectomy.
To perform a systematic review on age and postoperative outcome in esophageal cancer patients undergoing esophagectomy.
Studies comparing older with younger patients with primary esophageal cancer undergoing curative esophagectomy were included. Meta-analysis of studies using a 75-year age threshold are presented in the manuscript, studies using other age thresholds in the Supplementary material. MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles published between 1995 and 2020. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Primary outcomes were anastomotic leak, pulmonary and cardiac complications, delirium, 30- and 90-d, and in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included pneumonia and 5-year overall survival.
Seven studies (4847 patients) using an age threshold of 75 years were included for meta-analysis with 755 older and 4092 younger patients. Older patients (9.05%) had higher rates of 90-d mortality compared with younger patients (3.92%), (confidence interval = 1.10-5.56). In addition, older patients (9.45%) had higher rates of in-hospital mortality compared with younger patients (3.68%), (confidence interval = 1.01-5.91). In the subgroup of 2 studies with minimally invasive esophagectomy, older and younger patients had comparable 30-d, 90-d and in-hospital mortality rates.
Older patients undergoing curative esophagectomy for esophageal cancer have a higher postoperative mortality risk. Minimally invasive esophagectomy may be important for minimizing mortality in older patients.
越来越多的老年患者正在接受食管癌的根治性手术治疗。以往的荟萃分析表明,与年轻患者相比,老年患者术后的发病率和死亡率更高,这可能导致基于年龄的患者选择。然而,以往研究仅纳入了接受开放食管切除术的患者。因此,对于接受微创食管切除术的患者,年龄与预后之间是否存在关联仍不清楚。
对接受食管切除术的食管癌患者的年龄与术后预后进行系统评价。
纳入比较接受根治性食管切除术的老年和年轻原发性食管癌患者的研究。本文呈现了以75岁为年龄阈值的研究的荟萃分析,补充材料中呈现了使用其他年龄阈值的研究。检索MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆中1995年至2020年发表的文章。采用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。主要结局为吻合口漏、肺部和心脏并发症、谵妄、30天和90天死亡率以及住院死亡率。次要结局包括肺炎和5年总生存率。
纳入7项以75岁为年龄阈值的研究(4847例患者)进行荟萃分析,其中老年患者755例,年轻患者4092例。老年患者90天死亡率(9.05%)高于年轻患者(3.92%),(置信区间=1.10-5.56)。此外,老年患者住院死亡率(9.45%)高于年轻患者(3.68%),(置信区间=1.01-5.91)。在2项微创食管切除术的研究亚组中,老年和年轻患者的30天、90天和住院死亡率相当。
接受食管癌根治性食管切除术的老年患者术后死亡风险较高。微创食管切除术对于降低老年患者的死亡率可能很重要。