Center for Comprehensive Access Delivery Research & Evaluation (CADRE), VA Iowa City Healthcare System, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Rural Health. 2022 Jan;38(1):282-292. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12559. Epub 2021 Feb 28.
Emergency department (ED) crowding is increasing and is associated with adverse patient outcomes. The objective of this study was to measure the relative impact of ED boarding on timeliness of early ED care for new patient arrivals, with a focus on the differential impact in low-volume rural hospitals.
A retrospective cohort of all patients presenting to a Veterans Health Administration (VHA) ED between 2011 and 2014. The primary exposure was the number of patients in the ED at the time of ED registration, stratified by disposition (admit, discharge, or transfer) and mental health diagnosis. The primary outcome was time-to-provider evaluation, and secondary outcomes included time-to-EKG, time-to-laboratory testing, time-to-radiography, and total ED length-of-stay. Rurality was measured using the Rural-Urban Commuting Areas.
A total of 5,912,368 patients were included from all 123 VHA EDs. Adjusting for acuity, new patients had longer time-to-provider when more patients were in the ED, and patients awaiting transfer for nonmental health conditions impacted time-to-provider for new patients (16.6 min delays, 95% CI: 12.3-20.7 min) more than other patient types. Rural patients saw a greater impact of crowding on care timeliness than nonrural patients (additional 5.3 min in time-to-provider per additional patient in ED, 95% CI: 4.3-6.4), and the impact of additional patients in all categories was most pronounced in the lowest-volume EDs.
Patients seen in EDs with more crowding have small, but additive, delays in early elements of ED care, and transferring patients with nonmental health diagnoses from rural facilities were associated with the greatest impact.
急诊部(ED)拥挤现象日益严重,与患者不良预后相关。本研究旨在衡量 ED 滞留对新患者到达后早期 ED 护理及时性的相对影响,重点关注低容量农村医院的差异影响。
回顾性队列研究纳入了 2011 年至 2014 年间所有在退伍军人健康管理局(VHA)ED 就诊的患者。主要暴露因素是 ED 登记时 ED 中的患者人数,按处置(入院、出院或转院)和心理健康诊断进行分层。主要结局是到医生评估的时间,次要结局包括到心电图(EKG)的时间、到实验室检查的时间、到放射学的时间和 ED 总住院时间。农村性使用农村-城市通勤区来衡量。
共纳入了来自 123 个 VHA ED 的 5912368 名患者。调整严重程度后,新患者的 ED 中患者人数越多,到达医生的时间就越长,等待非心理健康状况转院的患者对新患者到达医生的时间影响更大(延迟 16.6 分钟,95%置信区间:12.3-20.7 分钟)超过其他患者类型。与非农村患者相比,农村患者的拥挤对护理及时性的影响更大(ED 中每增加一名患者,到达医生的时间增加 5.3 分钟,95%置信区间:4.3-6.4),所有类别中患者人数的增加对最低容量 ED 的影响最为明显。
拥挤程度较高的 ED 就诊患者的早期 ED 护理有轻微但可累加的延迟,从农村医疗机构转院的非心理健康诊断患者对延迟的影响最大。