• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

地塞米松治疗 ARDS 合并 COVID-19 患者的效果 - 一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验(REMED 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。

Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 - prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital Brno and Masaryk University, Faculty of Medicine, Jihlavská 20, 625 00, Brno, Czech Republic.

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, University Hospital Královské Vinohrady and Charles University, 3rd Faculty of Medicine, Šrobárova, 1150 100 34, Praha, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Trials. 2021 Mar 1;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05116-9.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-021-05116-9
PMID:33648568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7917377/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this study is to test the hypothesis that administration of dexamethasone 20 mg is superior to a 6 mg dose in adult patients with moderate or severe ARDS due to confirmed COVID-19. The secondary objective is to investigate the efficacy and safety of dexamethasone 20 mg versus dexamethasone 6 mg. The exploratory objective of this study is to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days.

TRIAL DESIGN

REMED is a prospective, phase II, open-label, randomised controlled trial testing superiority of dexamethasone 20 mg vs 6 mg. The trial aims to be pragmatic, i.e. designed to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in conditions that are close to real-life routine clinical practice.

PARTICIPANTS

The study is multi-centre and will be conducted in the intensive care units (ICUs) of ten university hospitals in the Czech Republic.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Subjects will be eligible for the trial if they meet all of the following criteria: 1. Adult (≥18 years of age) at time of enrolment; 2. Present COVID-19 (infection confirmed by RT-PCR or antigen testing); 3. Intubation/mechanical ventilation or ongoing high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) oxygen therapy; 4. Moderate or severe ARDS according to Berlin criteria:  • Moderate - PaO/FiO 100-200 mmHg;  • Severe - PaO/FiO < 100 mmHg; 5. Admission to ICU in the last 24 hours.

EXCLUSION CRITERIA

Subjects will not be eligible for the trial if they meet any of the following criteria: 1. Known allergy/hypersensitivity to dexamethasone or excipients of the investigational medicinal product (e.g. parabens, benzyl alcohol); 2. Fulfilled criteria for ARDS for ≥14 days at enrolment; 3. Pregnancy or breastfeeding; 4. Unwillingness to comply with contraception measurements from enrolment until at least 1 week after the last dose of dexamethasone (sexual abstinence is considered an adequate contraception method); 5. End-of-life decision or patient is expected to die within next 24 hours; 6. Decision not to intubate or ceilings of care in place; 7. Immunosuppression and/or immunosuppressive drugs in medical history:  a) Systemic immunosuppressive drugs or chemotherapy in the past 30 days;  b) Systemic corticosteroid use before hospitalization;  c) Any dose of dexamethasone during the present hospital stay for COVID-19 for ≥5 days before enrolment;  d) Systemic corticosteroids during present hospital stay for conditions other than COVID-19 (e.g. septic shock); 8. Current haematological or generalized solid malignancy; 9. Any contraindication for corticosteroid administration, e.g.  • intractable hyperglycaemia;  • active gastrointestinal bleeding;  • adrenal gland disorders;  • presence of superinfection diagnosed with locally established clinical and laboratory criteria without adequate antimicrobial treatment; 10. Cardiac arrest before ICU admission; 11. Participation in another interventional trial in the last 30 days.

INTERVENTION AND COMPARATOR

Dexamethasone solution for injection/infusion is the investigational medicinal product as well as the comparator. The trial will assess two doses, 20 mg (investigational) vs 6 mg (comparator). Patients in the intervention group will receive dexamethasone 20 mg intravenously once daily on day 1-5, followed by dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously once daily on day 6-10. Patients in the control group will receive dexamethasone 6 mg day 1-10. All authorized medicinal products containing dexamethasone in the form of solution for i.v. injection/infusion can be used.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Primary endpoint: Number of ventilator-free days (VFDs) at 28 days after randomisation, defined as being alive and free from mechanical ventilation. SECONDARY ENDPOINTS: a) Mortality from any cause at 60 days after randomisation; b) Dynamics of inflammatory marker (C-Reactive Protein, CRP) change from Day 1 to Day 14; c) WHO Clinical Progression Scale at Day 14; d) Adverse events related to corticosteroids (new infections, new thrombotic complications) until Day 28 or hospital discharge; e) Independence at 90 days after randomisation assessed by Barthel Index. The long-term outcomes of this study are to assess long-term consequences on mortality and quality of life at 180 and 360 days through telephone structured interviews using the Barthel Index.

RANDOMISATION

Randomisation will be carried out within the electronic case report form (eCRF) by the stratified permuted block randomisation method. Allocation sequences will be prepared by a statistician independent of the study team. Allocation to the treatment arm of an individual patient will not be available to the investigators before completion of the whole randomisation process. The following stratification factors will be applied: • Age <65 and ≥ 65; • Charlson Comorbidity index (CCI) <3 and ≥3; • CRP <150 mg/L and ≥150 mg/L • Trial centre. Patients will be randomised in a 1 : 1 ratio into one of the two treatment arms. Randomisation through the eCRF will be available 24 hours every day.

BLINDING (MASKING): This is an open-label trial in which the participants and the study staff will be aware of the allocated intervention. Blinded pre-planned statistical analysis will be performed.

NUMBERS TO BE RANDOMISED (SAMPLE SIZE): The sample size is calculated to detect the difference of 3 VFDs at 28 days (primary efficacy endpoint) between the two treatment arms with a two-sided type I error of 0.05 and power of 80%. Based on data from a multi-centre randomised controlled trial in COVID-19 ARDS patients in Brazil and a multi-centre observational study from French and Belgian ICUs regarding moderate to severe ARDS related to COVID-19, investigators assumed a standard deviation of VFD at 28 days as 9. Using these assumptions, a total of 142 patients per treatment arm would be needed. After adjustment for a drop-out rate, 150 per treatment arm (300 patients per study) will be enrolled.

TRIAL STATUS

This is protocol version 1.1, 15.01.2021. The trial is due to start on 2 February 2021 and recruitment is expected to be completed by December 2021.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol was registered on EudraCT No.:2020-005887-70, and on December 11, 2020 on ClinicalTrials.gov (Title: Effect of Two Different Doses of Dexamethasone in Patients With ARDS and COVID-19 (REMED)) Identifier: NCT04663555 with a last update posted on February 1, 2021.

FULL PROTOCOL

The full protocol (version 1.1) is attached as an additional file, accessible from the Trials website (Additional file 1). In the interest of expediting dissemination of this material, the standard formatting has been eliminated; this Letter serves as a summary of the key elements of the full protocol.

摘要

研究方案:研究两种不同剂量地塞米松对 COVID-19 相关成人中重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者的疗效和安全性

目的:本研究的主要目的是检验以下假设,即与 6 毫克剂量相比,给予 20 毫克地塞米松可使确诊 COVID-19 导致的中度或重度 ARDS 成人患者获益更多。次要目的是比较 20 毫克地塞米松和 6 毫克地塞米松的疗效和安全性。本研究的探索性目的是评估在 180 天和 360 天的死亡率和生活质量的长期后果。

试验设计:REMED 是一项前瞻性、二期、开放标签、随机对照试验,旨在比较 20 毫克地塞米松与 6 毫克地塞米松的疗效,试验设计注重实用性,即评估干预措施在接近真实临床实践的情况下的有效性。

参与者:该研究为多中心研究,将在捷克共和国的十所大学医院的重症监护病房(ICU)进行。

入选标准:符合以下所有标准的受试者将有资格参加试验:1. 入组时年龄≥18 岁;2. 确诊 COVID-19(通过 RT-PCR 或抗原检测证实);3. 气管插管/机械通气或持续高流量鼻导管(HFNC)氧疗;4. 根据柏林标准,中度或重度 ARDS:• 中度-氧分压/吸入氧分数比(PaO/FiO)100-200 mmHg;• 重度-PaO/FiO<100 mmHg;5. 在过去 24 小时内入住 ICU。

排除标准:符合以下任何标准的受试者将没有资格参加试验:1. 对地塞米松或研究药物的赋形剂(如对羟基苯甲酸酯、苯甲醇)已知过敏/过敏;2. 入组时 ARDS 符合标准已≥14 天;3. 妊娠或哺乳期;4. 不愿意遵守避孕措施,从入组开始至至少 1 周后最后一次地塞米松给药(性禁欲被认为是一种有效的避孕方法);5. 预计在未来 24 小时内死亡或已下达终末关怀决定;6. 拒绝插管或已实施治疗上限;7. 有免疫抑制和/或既往使用免疫抑制药物史:a. 过去 30 天内全身免疫抑制剂或化疗;b. 入院前使用全身皮质类固醇;c. 在入组前≥5 天因 COVID-19 在本次住院期间接受任何剂量的地塞米松治疗;d. 在本次因 COVID-19 以外的疾病住院期间接受全身皮质类固醇治疗(如脓毒性休克);8. 目前有血液系统或全身性实体恶性肿瘤;9. 存在地塞米松给药的任何禁忌症,例如:i. 难以控制的高血糖;ii. 活动性胃肠道出血;iii. 肾上腺疾病;iv. 根据当地建立的临床和实验室标准诊断出有新的感染且未进行适当的抗菌治疗;10. ICU 入院前心脏骤停;11. 在过去 30 天内参加了另一项干预性试验。

干预和对照:地塞米松注射液/输注用溶液是研究药物也是对照药物。试验将评估两种剂量,20 毫克(研究组)和 6 毫克(对照组)。干预组患者将在第 1-5 天每天接受一次静脉注射地塞米松 20 毫克,随后在第 6-10 天每天接受一次静脉注射地塞米松 10 毫克。对照组患者将在第 1-10 天每天接受地塞米松 6 毫克。所有经授权的含有地塞米松形式的溶液均可用于 i.v. 注射/输注。

主要结局:主要终点:随机分组后 28 天的无机械通气天数(VFDs),定义为存活且无机械通气。次要终点:a. 随机分组后 60 天的全因死亡率;b. 从第 1 天到第 14 天炎症标志物(C 反应蛋白,CRP)变化的动态;c. 第 14 天的 WHO 临床进展量表;d. 第 28 天或出院前与皮质激素相关的不良事件(新感染、新血栓并发症);e. 随机分组后 90 天通过巴氏指数评估的独立性。该研究的长期结果是通过电话结构访谈使用巴氏指数评估在 180 天和 360 天的死亡率和生活质量的长期后果。

随机化:将通过电子病例报告表(eCRF)通过分层区组随机化方法进行随机化。所有分配序列将由独立于研究团队的统计学家准备。在完成整个随机化过程之前,研究人员无法获得个体患者治疗组的分配情况。将应用以下分层因素:a. 年龄<65 岁和≥65 岁;b. Charlson 合并症指数(CCI)<3 和≥3;c. CRP<150mg/L 和≥150mg/L;d. 试验中心。患者将以 1:1 的比例随机分配到两个治疗组之一。通过 eCRF 进行的随机化 24 小时每天都可用。

盲法(设盲):这是一项开放标签试验,参与者和研究人员将了解分配的干预措施。将进行盲法预计划的统计分析。

需要随机化的人数(样本量):根据 COVID-19 ARDS 患者的多中心随机对照试验和 COVID-19 相关中度至重度 ARDS 的法国和比利时 ICU 的多中心观察性研究的数据,计算出在 28 天(主要疗效终点)时 3 个 VFD 的差异,两组的双侧Ⅰ类错误为 0.05,功效为 80%。假设 28 天 VFD 的标准偏差为 9。使用这些假设,每组需要 150 例。在调整失访率后,每组(共 300 例患者)将纳入 150 例。

试验状态:这是第 1.1 版方案,2021 年 1 月 15 日。该试验预计于 2021 年 2 月 2 日开始,预计于 2021 年 12 月完成招募。

试验注册:该研究方案已在 EudraCT 号:2020-005887-70 上注册,并于 2020 年 12 月 11 日在 ClinicalTrials.gov(标题:两种不同剂量地塞米松在 COVID-19 相关 ARDS 患者中的疗效(REMED))上注册,最后一次更新是在 2021 年 2 月 1 日。

完整方案:完整的方案(第 1.1 版)作为附加文件附上,可从试验网站获取(附加文件 1)。为了加快传播材料的速度,已省略了标准格式;本函件是完整方案的关键要素摘要。

相似文献

1
Effect of dexamethasone in patients with ARDS and COVID-19 - prospective, multi-centre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial (REMED trial): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.地塞米松治疗 ARDS 合并 COVID-19 患者的效果 - 一项前瞻性、多中心、开放标签、平行组、随机对照试验(REMED 试验):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Mar 1;22(1):172. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05116-9.
2
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
3
Double-blind, randomized, controlled, trial to assess the efficacy of allogenic mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 (COVID-AT): A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.双盲、随机、对照临床试验评估同种异体间充质基质细胞治疗 COVID-19 所致急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的疗效(COVID-AT):一项随机对照试验的研究方案的结构总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 6;22(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04964-1.
4
Multi-centre, three arm, randomized controlled trial on the use of methylprednisolone and unfractionated heparin in critically ill ventilated patients with pneumonia from SARS-CoV-2 infection: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.多中心、三臂、随机对照试验研究甲泼尼龙和普通肝素在 SARS-CoV-2 感染肺炎危重症机械通气患者中的应用:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Aug 17;21(1):724. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04645-z.
5
Testing the efficacy and safety of BIO101, for the prevention of respiratory deterioration, in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia (COVA study): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.评估 BIO101 预防 COVID-19 肺炎患者呼吸恶化的疗效和安全性(COVA 研究):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Jan 11;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04998-5.
6
A Phase I/II Clinical Trial to evaluate the efficacy of baricitinib to prevent respiratory insufficiency progression in onco-hematological patients affected with COVID19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.一项评估巴瑞替尼预防 COVID19 相关血液肿瘤患者呼吸功能不全进展的疗效的 I/II 期临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Feb 5;22(1):116. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05072-4.
7
Randomized clinical trial to evaluate safety and efficacy of convalescent plasma use among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 (PERUCONPLASMA): a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.随机临床试验评估 COVID-19 住院患者使用恢复期血浆的安全性和疗效(PERUCONPLASMA):一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 May 17;22(1):342. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05189-6.
8
Randomised controlled trial comparing efficacy and safety of high versus low Low-Molecular Weight Heparin dosages in hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and coagulopathy not requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (COVID-19 HD): a structured summary of a study protocol.随机对照试验比较高剂量与低剂量低分子肝素在需要侵入性机械通气的严重 COVID-19 肺炎和凝血病住院患者中的疗效和安全性 (COVID-19 HD):研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Jun 26;21(1):574. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04475-z.
9
A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, pilot trial of intravenous plasma purified alpha-1 antitrypsin for SARS-CoV-2-induced Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised, controlled trial.静脉注射血浆纯化的α-1 抗胰蛋白酶治疗 SARS-CoV-2 诱导的急性呼吸窘迫综合征的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、初步临床试验:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2021 Apr 19;22(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05254-0.
10
High dose dexamethasone treatment for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome secondary to COVID-19: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 继发急性呼吸窘迫综合征的高剂量地塞米松治疗:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Aug 26;21(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04646-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of two different dexamethasone dosing regimens on ventilator-free days and long-term mortality in COVID-19 patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS: the REMED randomized clinical trial.两种不同地塞米松给药方案对中度至重度急性呼吸窘迫综合征的 COVID-19 患者无呼吸机天数和长期死亡率的影响:REMED 随机临床试验
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Dec 23;29(1):616. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02215-6.
2
Evaluating the Risk-Benefit Profile of Corticosteroid Therapy for COVID-19 Patients: A Scoping Review.评估COVID-19患者皮质类固醇治疗的风险效益概况:一项范围综述。
Pharmacy (Basel). 2024 Aug 22;12(4):129. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy12040129.
3
Effects of Different Corticosteroid Doses in Elderly Unvaccinated Patients with Severe to Critical COVID-19.不同皮质类固醇剂量对未接种疫苗的老年重症至危重症COVID-19患者的影响
Life (Basel). 2022 Nov 18;12(11):1924. doi: 10.3390/life12111924.
4
An Executed Plan to Combat COVID-19 in the United States.美国应对 COVID-19 的执行计划。
Adv Anesth. 2022 Dec;40(1):45-62. doi: 10.1016/j.aan.2022.07.002. Epub 2022 Jul 13.
5
The impact of obesity on the outcome of severe SARS-CoV-2 ARDS in a high volume ECMO centre: ECMO and corticosteroids support the obesity paradox.肥胖对大容量 ECMO 中心严重 SARS-CoV-2 ARDS 结局的影响:ECMO 和皮质类固醇支持肥胖悖论。
J Crit Care. 2022 Dec;72:154162. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2022.154162. Epub 2022 Oct 8.
6
A Peek into Pandora's Box: COVID-19 and Neurodegeneration.窥探潘多拉魔盒:新冠病毒与神经退行性变
Brain Sci. 2022 Jan 30;12(2):190. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12020190.
7
Low- Versus High-Dose Methylprednisolone in Adult Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019: Less Is More.2019年冠状病毒病成年患者中低剂量与高剂量甲泼尼龙的比较:少即是多。
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2021 Dec 8;9(1):ofab619. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab619. eCollection 2022 Jan.
8
Comparison of Low-Versus High-Dose Steroids in the Clinical Outcome of Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients.低剂量与高剂量类固醇对住院COVID-19患者临床结局的比较
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Dec 9;10(12):1510. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10121510.
9
Do high-dose corticosteroids improve outcomes in hospitalized COVID-19 patients?大剂量皮质类固醇能否改善住院 COVID-19 患者的结局?
J Med Virol. 2022 Jan;94(1):372-379. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27357. Epub 2021 Oct 8.
10
The Role of Glucocorticoids in the Treatment of ARDS: A Multicenter Retrospective Study Based on the eICU Collaborative Research Database.糖皮质激素在急性呼吸窘迫综合征治疗中的作用:一项基于电子重症监护病房协作研究数据库的多中心回顾性研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2021 Jul 26;8:678260. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.678260. eCollection 2021.