Systems and Data Analysis, Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.W., M.J.); Drug Discovery Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Biberach, Germany (S.S., E.M., N.P.); and Firma Biopharmacon, Gothenburg, Sweden (J.G.)
Systems and Data Analysis, Fraunhofer-Chalmers Centre, Gothenburg, Sweden (M.W., M.J.); Drug Discovery Sciences, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co KG, Biberach, Germany (S.S., E.M., N.P.); and Firma Biopharmacon, Gothenburg, Sweden (J.G.).
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2021 May;377(2):218-231. doi: 10.1124/jpet.120.000348. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
Cardiovascular adverse effects in drug development are a major source of compound attrition. Characterization of blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), stroke volume (SV), and QT-interval prolongation are therefore necessary in early discovery. It is, however, common practice to analyze these effects independently of each other. High-resolution time courses are collected via telemetric techniques, but only low-resolution data are analyzed and reported. This ignores codependencies among responses (HR, BP, SV, and QT-interval) and separation of system (turnover properties) and drug-specific properties (potencies, efficacies). An analysis of drug exposure-time and high-resolution response-time data of HR and mean arterial blood pressure was performed after acute oral dosing of ivabradine, sildenafil, dofetilide, and pimobendan in Han-Wistar rats. All data were modeled jointly, including different compounds and exposure and response time courses, using a nonlinear mixed-effects approach. Estimated fractional turnover rates [h, relative standard error (%RSE) within parentheses] were 9.45 (15), 30.7 (7.8), 3.8 (13), and 0.115 (1.7) for QT, HR, total peripheral resistance, and SV, respectively. Potencies (nM, %RSE within parentheses) were = 475 (11), = 4.01 (5.4), = 50.6 (93), and = 47.8 (16), and efficacies (%RSE within parentheses) were = 0.944 (1.7), = 1.00 (1.3), = 0.195 (9.9), and = 0.745 (4.6) for ivabradine, sildenafil, dofetilide, and pimobendan. Hill parameters were estimated with good precision and below unity, indicating a shallow concentration-response relationship. An equilibrium concentration-biomarker response relationship was predicted and displayed graphically. This analysis demonstrates the utility of a model-based approach integrating data from different studies and compounds for refined preclinical safety margin assessment. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A model-based approach was proposed utilizing biomarker data on heart rate, blood pressure, and QT-interval. A pharmacodynamic model was developed to improve assessment of high-resolution telemetric cardiovascular safety data driven by different drugs (ivabradine, sildenafil, dofetilide, and pimobondan), wherein system- (turnover rates) and drug-specific parameters (e.g., potencies and efficacies) were sought. The model-predicted equilibrium concentration-biomarker response relationships and was used for safety assessment (predictions of 20% effective concentration, for example) of heart rate, blood pressure, and QT-interval.
心血管不良药物作用是化合物淘汰的主要原因。因此,在早期发现中,有必要对血压 (BP)、心率 (HR)、心输出量 (SV) 和 QT 间期延长进行特征描述。然而,通常的做法是彼此独立地分析这些作用。通过遥测技术收集高分辨率时间曲线,但仅分析和报告低分辨率数据。这忽略了响应(HR、BP、SV 和 QT 间期)之间的相依关系,以及系统(周转率特性)和药物特异性特性(效力、功效)的分离。在汉- Wistar 大鼠中急性口服给予伊伐布雷定、西地那非、多非利特和匹莫苯丹后,对 HR 和平均动脉血压的药物暴露时间和高分辨率反应时间数据进行了分析。使用非线性混合效应方法对所有数据进行了联合建模,包括不同化合物和暴露及反应时间过程。估计的部分周转率率 [h,括号内的相对标准误差(%RSE)] 分别为 QT、HR、总外周阻力和 SV 的 9.45(15)、30.7(7.8)、3.8(13)和 0.115(1.7)。效力(nM,%RSE 括号内)分别为 = 475(11)、 = 4.01(5.4)、 = 50.6(93)和 = 47.8(16),功效(%RSE 括号内)分别为 = 0.944(1.7)、 = 1.00(1.3)、 = 0.195(9.9)和 = 0.745(4.6),伊伐布雷定、西地那非、多非利特和匹莫苯丹。Hill 参数估计具有良好的精度且低于 1,表明浓度-反应关系较浅。预测了平衡浓度-生物标志物反应关系,并以图形方式显示。该分析证明了一种基于模型的方法的实用性,该方法整合了来自不同研究和化合物的数据,用于改进临床前安全性边际评估。 意义声明:提出了一种利用心率、血压和 QT 间期的生物标志物数据的基于模型的方法。开发了一个药效学模型,以改善不同药物(伊伐布雷定、西地那非、多非利特和匹莫苯丹)驱动的高分辨率遥测心血管安全性数据的评估,其中寻求系统(周转率率)和药物特异性参数(例如,效力和功效)。模型预测的平衡浓度-生物标志物反应关系用于心率、血压和 QT 间期的安全性评估(例如,预测 20%有效浓度)。