Neurology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
Multiple Sclerosis and Neuroimmunology Program, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Jul;92(7):757-768. doi: 10.1136/jnnp-2020-325300. Epub 2021 Mar 1.
The objective of this paper is to evaluate available evidence for each step in autoimmune encephalitis management and provide expert opinion when evidence is lacking. The paper approaches autoimmune encephalitis as a broad category rather than focusing on individual antibody syndromes. Core authors from the Autoimmune Encephalitis Alliance Clinicians Network reviewed literature and developed the first draft. Where evidence was lacking or controversial, an electronic survey was distributed to all members to solicit individual responses. Sixty-eight members from 17 countries answered the survey. Corticosteroids alone or combined with other agents (intravenous IG or plasmapheresis) were selected as a first-line therapy by 84% of responders for patients with a general presentation, 74% for patients presenting with faciobrachial dystonic seizures, 63% for NMDAR-IgG encephalitis and 48.5% for classical paraneoplastic encephalitis. Half the responders indicated they would add a second-line agent only if there was no response to more than one first-line agent, 32% indicated adding a second-line agent if there was no response to one first-line agent, while only 15% indicated using a second-line agent in all patients. As for the preferred second-line agent, 80% of responders chose rituximab while only 10% chose cyclophosphamide in a clinical scenario with unknown antibodies. Detailed survey results are presented in the manuscript and a summary of the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations is presented at the conclusion.
本文旨在评估自身免疫性脑炎治疗各个环节的现有证据,并在证据不足的情况下提供专家意见。本文将自身免疫性脑炎视为一个广泛的类别,而不是专注于个别抗体综合征。自身免疫性脑炎联盟临床医生网络的核心作者回顾了文献并起草了初稿。在缺乏证据或存在争议的情况下,向所有成员分发了电子调查,以征求个人意见。来自 17 个国家的 68 名成员回答了调查。84%的应答者为表现一般的患者选择了单独使用皮质类固醇或联合其他药物(静脉注射免疫球蛋白或血浆置换)作为一线治疗,74%的应答者为出现面臂肌张力障碍性发作的患者选择了一线治疗,63%的应答者为 NMDA 受体-IgG 脑炎患者选择了一线治疗,48.5%的应答者为经典副肿瘤性脑炎患者选择了一线治疗。一半的应答者表示,如果对一种以上的一线药物没有反应,他们只会添加第二种药物;32%的应答者表示,如果对一种一线药物没有反应,他们会添加第二种药物;而只有 15%的应答者表示会在所有患者中使用第二种药物。至于首选的二线药物,在抗体未知的临床情况下,80%的应答者选择利妥昔单抗,而只有 10%的应答者选择环磷酰胺。详细的调查结果在本文中呈现,诊断和治疗建议的摘要在结论中呈现。