IMPACCT, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
These authors are joint first authors.
Eur Respir J. 2021 Oct 7;58(4). doi: 10.1183/13993003.04613-2020. Print 2021 Oct.
Oxygen therapy is frequently prescribed for the palliation of breathlessness, despite lack of evidence for its effectiveness in people who are not hypoxaemic. This study aimed to compare and contrast patients', caregivers' and clinicians' experiences of palliative oxygen use for the relief of chronic breathlessness in people with advanced life-limiting illnesses, and how this shapes prescribing.A systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative data was conducted. MEDLINE, CINAHL and PsycINFO were searched for peer-reviewed studies in English (2000-April 2019) reporting perspectives on palliative oxygen use for reducing breathlessness in people with advanced illnesses in any healthcare setting. After data extraction, thematic synthesis used line-by-line coding of raw data (quotes) to generate descriptive and analytical themes.Of 457 articles identified, 22 met the inclusion criteria by reporting perspectives of patients (n=337), caregivers (n=91) or clinicians (n=616). Themes common to these perspectives were: 1) benefits and burdens of palliative oxygen use, 2) knowledge and perceptions of palliative oxygen use beyond the guidelines, and 3) longitudinal trajectories of palliative oxygen use.There are differing perceptions regarding the benefits and burdens of using palliative oxygen. Clinicians should be aware that oxygen use may generate differing goals of therapy for patients and caregivers. These perceptions should be taken into consideration when prescribing oxygen for the symptomatic relief of chronic breathlessness in patients who do not quality for long-term oxygen therapy.
氧疗常被用于缓解呼吸困难,但对于非低氧血症患者,其疗效缺乏证据。本研究旨在比较和对比晚期生命有限疾病患者的姑息性氧疗缓解慢性呼吸困难的患者、护理人员和临床医生的体验,以及这如何影响处方制定。采用系统综述和定性数据元综合方法。在英文同行评审研究中(2000 年至 2019 年 4 月),在任何医疗保健环境中,对减轻晚期疾病患者呼吸困难的姑息性氧疗使用的观点进行了 MEDLINE、CINAHL 和 PsycINFO 检索。在提取数据后,主题综合使用原始数据(引文)的逐行编码生成描述性和分析性主题。在 457 篇文章中,有 22 篇符合纳入标准,报告了患者(n=337)、护理人员(n=91)或临床医生(n=616)的观点。这些观点的共同主题是:1)姑息性氧疗的益处和负担,2)姑息性氧疗在指南之外的知识和认知,以及 3)姑息性氧疗的纵向轨迹。对于使用姑息性氧疗的益处和负担存在不同的看法。临床医生应该意识到,氧疗可能会为患者和护理人员产生不同的治疗目标。在为不符合长期氧疗条件的慢性呼吸困难患者开具症状缓解性氧疗时,应考虑这些看法。