Pinto Marcus V, Ng Peng-Soon, Howe Benjamin M, Laughlin Ruple S, Thapa Prabin, Dyck Peter J, Dyck P James B
From the Departments of Neurology (M.V.P., R.S.L., P.J.D., P.J.B.D.), Radiology (B.M.H.), and Biomedical Statistics and Informatics (P.T.), Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; and Department of Neurology, National Neuroscience Institute (P.-S.N.), Singapore.
Neurology. 2021 Apr 20;96(16):e2098-e2108. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000011799. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
To determine whether patients in the community with lumbosacral radiculoplexus neuropathy (LRPN) have milder neuropathy than referral patients, we characterized the outcomes and survival of population-based compared to referral-based LRPN cohorts.
Previously, we found that the incidence of LRPN is 4.16/100,000/y, a frequency greater than other inflammatory neuropathies. The survival of patients with LRPN is uncharacterized.
Sixty-two episodes in 59 patients with LRPN were identified over 16 years (2000-2015). Clinical findings were compared to previous referral-based LRPN cohorts. Survival data were compared to those of age- and sex-matched controls.
At LRPN diagnosis, median age was 70 years, median Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) 22 points, 92% had pain, 95% had weakness, 23% were wheelchair-bound, and median modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) was 3 (range 1-4). At last follow-up, median NIS improved to 17 points ( < 0.001) with 56% having ≥4 points improvement, 16% were wheelchair-bound, and median mRS was 2. Compared to referral-based LRPN cohorts, community patients with LRPN had less impairment, less bilateral disease (37% vs 92%), and less wheelchair usage (23% vs 49%). LRPN survival was 86% at 5 years and 55% at 10 years. Compared to age- and sex-matched controls, patients with LRPN had 76% increased risk of death ( = 0.016). In multivariate analysis, diabetes, age, stroke, chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, and coronary artery disease were significant mortality risk factors but LRPN was not.
LRPN is a painful, paralytic, asymmetric, monophasic, sometimes bilateral pan-plexopathy that improves over time but leaves patients with impairment. Although having LRPN increases mortality, this increase is probably due to comorbidities (diabetes) rather than LRPN itself.
为了确定社区中患有腰骶神经根丛神经病(LRPN)的患者是否比转诊患者的神经病变症状更轻,我们对基于人群的LRPN队列与基于转诊的LRPN队列的结局和生存率进行了特征描述。
此前,我们发现LRPN的发病率为4.16/10万/年,这一频率高于其他炎性神经病。LRPN患者的生存率尚无特征描述。
在16年(2000 - 2015年)期间,共识别出59例LRPN患者的62次发病情况。将临床发现与先前基于转诊的LRPN队列进行比较。将生存数据与年龄和性别匹配的对照组进行比较。
在LRPN诊断时,中位年龄为70岁,中位神经病变损害评分(NIS)为22分,92%的患者有疼痛,95%的患者有肌无力,23%的患者需依赖轮椅,改良Rankin量表评分(mRS)中位数为3分(范围1 - 4分)。在最后一次随访时,中位NIS改善至17分(<0.001),56%的患者改善≥4分,16%的患者需依赖轮椅,mRS中位数为2分。与基于转诊的LRPN队列相比,社区LRPN患者的损害较轻,双侧疾病较少(37%对92%),轮椅使用率较低(23%对49%)。LRPN患者5年生存率为86%,10年生存率为55%。与年龄和性别匹配的对照组相比,LRPN患者的死亡风险增加76%(P = 0.016)。在多变量分析中,糖尿病、年龄、中风、慢性肾病、外周动脉疾病和冠状动脉疾病是显著的死亡风险因素,但LRPN不是。
LRPN是一种疼痛性、麻痹性、不对称性、单相性、有时为双侧性的全丛神经病,随时间推移会有所改善,但患者仍有功能损害。虽然患有LRPN会增加死亡率,但这种增加可能是由于合并症(糖尿病)而非LRPN本身所致。