Mills Michael J, Nguyen John X, Himelhoch Ben, Souala Abdelouahid, Khashola Anthony, Joseph Sumita, Rathousky Phillip, Gonda Roger, Juan Michael C Y
Providence-Providence Park Hospital/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program, Southfield, MI.
3 Michigan State University College of Human Medicine Southeast Michigan Campus, Southfield, MI.
Spartan Med Res J. 2018 Sep 26;3(2):6936. doi: 10.51894/001c.6936.
Inaccurate and incomplete imaging order information presented to interpreting radiologists is a persistent problem in many radiology settings. Computerized Physician Order Entry processes in clinic-based settings are often inconsistent, and radiology transcription clerks continue to play a critical role in transmitting accurate content and information from referring physician orders to the radiology information system. (RIS) The purpose of this quality improvement project was to a) identify common transcription areas of deficient RIS imaging order information and b) test outcomes from an intervention to improve the content and concordance of transcribed patient information entered into the RIS.
A random convenience sample of 500 outpatient radiographic orders were categorized according to degree and quality of concordance between the transcribed patient information documented in the RIS and the corresponding original imaging order information. During Phase I, the authors used a root-cause analysis to determine the possible etiologies for discordance between the information in original imaging orders and the information transcribed into the RIS. The intervention that was delivered included a short education session with radiology transcription clerks with placement reminder posters at transcription workstations. During Phase 2, a second random sample was obtained following the intervention, with data collection and analyses replicating the process from Phase I. A set of inferential comparisons were conducted using chi-square tests to examine for statistical significance.
There was an overall 44% decrease in transcription discordance (p < 0.001), and the number of cases with perfectly concordant RIS order indication documentations increased by 21% (p < 0.001). A total of 34% of transcriptions from Phase I were partially discordant due to an inadequate imaging study indication, compared to 15% during Phase II (p < 0.001). There was also a 22% increase in the number of completely concordant transcriptions free of grammatical errors (p < 0.001).
A short education session with radiology transcription clerks along with placement of reminder posters may significantly improve both the concordance and quality of transcribed imaging order information presented to interpreting radiologists using the RIS.
在许多放射科环境中,提供给影像解读放射科医生的成像检查单信息不准确、不完整一直是个问题。基于诊所的环境中,计算机化医生医嘱录入流程往往不一致,放射科转录员在将转诊医生医嘱中的准确内容和信息传输到放射科信息系统(RIS)方面仍发挥着关键作用。本质量改进项目的目的是:a)识别RIS成像检查单信息转录不足的常见领域;b)测试一项干预措施的效果,以改善录入RIS的患者转录信息的内容和一致性。
根据RIS中记录的转录患者信息与相应原始成像检查单信息之间的一致程度和质量,对500份门诊X线检查单的随机便利样本进行分类。在第一阶段,作者使用根本原因分析来确定原始成像检查单中的信息与转录到RIS中的信息不一致的可能病因。实施的干预措施包括为放射科转录员举办简短的培训课程,并在转录工作站张贴提示海报。在第二阶段,干预后获取第二个随机样本,数据收集和分析重复第一阶段的过程。使用卡方检验进行一组推断性比较,以检验统计学显著性。
转录不一致总体下降了44%(p < 0.001),RIS检查单指示文档完全一致的病例数增加了21%(p < 0.001)。第一阶段共有34%的转录由于成像检查指征不充分而部分不一致,而第二阶段为15%(p < 0.001)。无语法错误的完全一致转录数量也增加了22%(p < 0.001)。
为放射科转录员举办简短的培训课程并张贴提示海报,可能会显著提高使用RIS呈现给影像解读放射科医生的转录成像检查单信息的一致性和质量。