Montague-McCown Mary, Bena James, Burchill Christian N
Wound Care Consult Team, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
Crit Care Explor. 2021 Feb 24;3(3):e0336. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000336. eCollection 2021 Mar.
Researchers have shown in laboratory studies that different types of fabrics were associated with changes in skin moisture, friction, shear, and temperature that may predispose patients to pressure injury. There was an association between type of fiber used in hospital linens and pressure injury development in previous clinical studies. We examined if bed linens made from a newly developed synthetic fiber fabric affected occurrence rate, time to development, and severity of unit-acquired pressure injury in critically ill adult inpatients.
Cluster randomized controlled trial.
Five adult medical ICUs within one quaternary care center in the Midwest United States.
Patients were assigned to a unit based on bed availability. In total, there were 3,332 patients in the study.
Participating medical ICUs were randomly assigned to cotton fiber or synthetic fiber linens for the first 6 months of the study period, and assignment reversed after a 14-day washout period for the final 6 months.
Unit-acquired pressure injury occurrence rate, time to first unit-acquired pressure injury, and severity were evaluated using generalized mixed effect models with patient as a random effect, and a marginal Cox proportional hazards model with repeated admissions from the same patient accounted for by use of a sandwich estimator of the variance. There were 1,706 patients on cotton fiber linens and 1,626 patients on synthetic fiber linens. Groups were similar on demographics except race and admitting diagnosis groupings. Occurrence rate ( = 0.99), time to development ( = 0.99), and maximum severity of unit-acquired pressure ( = 0.86) were similar between groups before and after controlling for race and admitting diagnosis groupings.
Linen type did not affect unit-acquired pressure injury occurrence rate, severity, or timing. Standard unit-acquired pressure injury prevention efforts may be more cost-effective than investment in synthetic fiber linens.
研究人员在实验室研究中表明,不同类型的织物与皮肤水分、摩擦力、剪切力和温度的变化有关,这些变化可能使患者易患压力性损伤。在先前的临床研究中,医院床单所用纤维类型与压力性损伤的发生之间存在关联。我们研究了由新开发的合成纤维织物制成的床单是否会影响重症成年住院患者院内获得性压力性损伤的发生率、发生时间和严重程度。
整群随机对照试验。
美国中西部一个四级医疗中心内的五个成人医学重症监护病房。
根据床位可用性将患者分配到各个病房。该研究共有3332名患者。
参与研究的医学重症监护病房在研究期的前6个月被随机分配使用棉纤维或合成纤维床单,在为期14天的洗脱期后,在最后6个月交换分配。
使用以患者为随机效应的广义混合效应模型,以及使用方差的三明治估计量来考虑同一患者重复入院情况的边际Cox比例风险模型,评估院内获得性压力性损伤的发生率、首次发生院内获得性压力性损伤的时间和严重程度。使用棉纤维床单的患者有1706名,使用合成纤维床单的患者有1626名。除种族和入院诊断分组外,两组在人口统计学特征上相似。在控制种族和入院诊断分组前后,两组之间的发生率(=0.99)、发生时间(=0.99)和院内获得性压力的最大严重程度(=0.86)相似。
床单类型不影响院内获得性压力性损伤的发生率、严重程度或发生时间。标准的院内获得性压力性损伤预防措施可能比投资合成纤维床单更具成本效益。