Suppr超能文献

无明显心脏病患者的院外心脏骤停:电生理观察与临床结局

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients with no overt heart disease: electrophysiologic observations and clinical outcome.

作者信息

Bhandari A K, Hong R, Au P, McKay C R, Rahimtoola S H

机构信息

Department of Medicine, LAC-USC Medical Center, University of Southern California School of Medicine 90033.

出版信息

Can J Cardiol. 1988 Mar;4(2):80-4.

PMID:3365601
Abstract

Electrophysiologic studies were performed in nine survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest who had no overt heart disease on clinical, hemodynamic and angiographic evaluation. Cardiac arrest occurred during sedentary activity in seven patients and during exercise in two; no patient was on antiarrhythmic drugs at the time of cardiac arrest. Twenty-four hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring demonstrated premature ventricular beats in four patients (44%). Electrophysiologic stimulation induced sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation (VF) in five patients, nonsustained VT in one patient and less than five ventricular beats in the remaining three patients. Of five patients with inducible sustained VT or VF, four had complete suppression of inducible VT with antiarrhythmic therapy, and none of these four patients died suddenly or had clinical VT after an average follow-up of 27 months (range 12 to 41 months). The remaining patient with inducible sustained VT refused serial electropharmacologic testing, was treated empirically with amiodarone (400 mg/day) and died suddenly eight months later. Of the four patients with noninducible sustained VT or VF, three received no antiarrhythmic therapy and one was given a beta-blocker. None had recurrent cardiac arrest or symptomatic VT after an average follow-up of 17 months (range 13 to 20 months). Thus, inducibility of sustained VT or VF provided a reliable end point for long term antiarrhythmic therapy and noninducibility identified a subset of patients that had an excellent prognosis without specific antiarrhythmic therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

对9名院外心脏骤停幸存者进行了电生理研究,这些患者在临床、血流动力学和血管造影评估中均无明显心脏病。7例患者在静息活动时发生心脏骤停,2例在运动时发生;心脏骤停时无一例患者正在服用抗心律失常药物。24小时动态心电图监测显示,4例患者(44%)有室性早搏。电生理刺激在5例患者中诱发了持续性室性心动过速(VT)或心室颤动(VF),1例患者诱发了非持续性VT,其余3例患者诱发的室性早搏少于5次。在5例可诱发持续性VT或VF的患者中,4例通过抗心律失常治疗完全抑制了可诱发的VT,这4例患者在平均随访27个月(范围12至41个月)后均未发生猝死或临床VT。其余1例可诱发持续性VT的患者拒绝进行系列电药理测试,经验性服用胺碘酮(400mg/天),8个月后猝死。在4例不可诱发持续性VT或VF的患者中,3例未接受抗心律失常治疗,1例给予β受体阻滞剂。平均随访17个月(范围13至20个月)后,无一例发生心脏骤停复发或有症状的VT。因此,持续性VT或VF的可诱发性为长期抗心律失常治疗提供了一个可靠的终点,而不可诱发性则确定了一部分患者,这些患者在不进行特定抗心律失常治疗的情况下预后良好。(摘要截断于250字)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验