Rheumatology Department, Hospital HLA Mediterráneo, Avenida Mediterráneo 353 bloque 2 4ºC, CP 04009, Almería, Spain.
Rheumatology Evidence Based Working Group, Spanish Society of Rheumatology, Madrid, Spain.
Rheumatol Int. 2021 Aug;41(8):1419-1427. doi: 10.1007/s00296-021-04808-4. Epub 2021 Mar 3.
The incidence of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (PJP) has increased over recent years in patients with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARD). PJP prognosis is poor in those receiving immunosuppressive therapy and glucocorticoids in particular. Despite the effectiveness of cotrimoxazole against PJP, the risk of adverse effects remains significant, and no consensus has emerged regarding the need for PJP prophylaxis in SARD patients undergoing immunosuppressor therapies.Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cotrimoxazole prophylaxis against PJP in SARD adult patients receiving immunosuppressive therapies. Methods: We performed a systematic review, consulting MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases up to April 2020. Outcomes covered prevention of PJP, other infections, morbidity, mortality, and safety. The information obtained was summarized with a narrative review and results were tabulated. Of the 318 identified references, 8 were included. Two were randomized controlled trials and six observational studies. The quality of studies was moderate or low. Despite disparities in the cotrimoxazole prophylaxis regimens described, results were consistent in terms of efficacy, particularly with glucocorticoid doses > 20 mg/day. However, cotrimoxazole 400 mg/80 mg/day, prescribed three times/ week, or 200 mg/40 mg/day or in dose escalation, exhibited similar positive performances. Conversely, cotrimoxazole 400 mg/80 mg/day showed higher incidences of withdrawals and adverse effects. Cotrimoxazole prophylaxis against PJP exhibited efficacy in SARD, mainly in patients taking glucocorticoids ≥ 20 mg/day. All cotrimoxazole regimens exposed seemed equally efficacious, although, higher quality trials are needed. Adverse effects were observed 2 months after initiation, particularly with the 400 mg/80 mg/day regimen. Conversely, escalation dosing or 200 mg/40 mg/day regimens appeared better tolerated.
卡氏肺孢子虫肺炎(PJP)在患有系统性自身免疫性风湿病(SARD)的患者中的发病率近年来有所增加。在接受免疫抑制治疗和糖皮质激素治疗的患者中,PJP 的预后较差。尽管复方磺胺甲噁唑对 PJP 有效,但不良反应的风险仍然很大,对于接受免疫抑制剂治疗的 SARD 患者是否需要预防 PJP,尚未达成共识。
目的:评估复方磺胺甲噁唑预防 SARD 成年患者接受免疫抑制治疗时发生 PJP 的疗效和安全性。
方法:我们对截至 2020 年 4 月的 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库进行了系统评价。结果涵盖预防 PJP、其他感染、发病率、死亡率和安全性。使用叙述性综述总结所获得的信息,并列出结果。在 318 篇确定的参考文献中,有 8 篇被纳入。其中 2 项为随机对照试验,6 项为观察性研究。研究的质量为中等或低等。尽管所描述的复方磺胺甲噁唑预防方案存在差异,但结果在疗效方面是一致的,特别是在接受糖皮质激素剂量>20mg/天的患者中。然而,每天三次给予 400mg/80mg 复方磺胺甲噁唑或 200mg/40mg 复方磺胺甲噁唑或剂量递增,表现出类似的积极效果。相反,400mg/80mg 复方磺胺甲噁唑的停药和不良反应发生率更高。复方磺胺甲噁唑预防 PJP 在 SARD 中有效,主要在接受糖皮质激素≥20mg/天的患者中。所有暴露的复方磺胺甲噁唑方案似乎同样有效,尽管需要更高质量的试验。不良反应在开始治疗后 2 个月出现,尤其是 400mg/80mg 复方磺胺甲噁唑方案。相反,递增剂量或 200mg/40mg 复方磺胺甲噁唑方案耐受性更好。
Ann Pharmacother. 2016-8
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2018-12-3
Ann Intensive Care. 2024-5-22
Curr Cardiol Rep. 2021-10-1
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1995-3