Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Liège, CHU Sart-Tilman, Domaine du Sart-Tilman, B-4000, Liège, Belgium.
Mellanby Centre for Bone Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Calcif Tissue Int. 2021 Jun;108(6):785-797. doi: 10.1007/s00223-021-00816-5. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
Biochemical bone turnover markers are useful tools to assess bone remodeling. C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (ß-CTX) has been recommended as a reference marker for bone resorption in research studies.
We describe the results of a multicenter study for routine clinical laboratory assays for ß-CTX in serum and plasma. Four centers (Athens GR, Copenhagen DK, Liege BE and Sheffield UK) collected serum and plasma (EDTA) samples from 796 patients presenting to osteoporosis clinics. Specimens were analyzed in duplicate with each of the available routine clinical laboratory methods according to the manufacturers' instructions. Passing-Bablok regressions, Bland-Altman plots, V-shape evaluation method, and Concordance correlation coefficient for ß-CTX values between serum and plasma specimens and between methods were used to determine the agreement between results. A generalized linear model was employed to identify possible variables that affected the relationship between the methods. Two pools of serum were finally prepared and sent to the four centers to be measured in 5-plicates on 5 consecutive days with the different methods.
We identified significant variations between methods and between centers although comparison results were generally more consistent in plasma compared to serum. We developed univariate linear regression equations to predict Roche Elecsys®, IDS-iSYS, or IDS ELISA ß-CTX results from any other assay and a multivariable model including the site of analysis, the age, and weight of the patient. The coefficients of determination (R) increased from approximately 0.80 in the univariate model to approximately 0.90 in the multivariable one, with the site of analysis being the major contributing factor. Results observed on the pools also suggest that long-term storage could explain the difference observed with the different methods on serum.
Our results show large within- and between-assay variation for ß-CTX measurement, particularly in serum. Stability of the analyte could be one of the explanations. More studies should be undertaken to overcome this problem. Until harmonization is achieved, we recommend measuring ß-CTX by the same assay on EDTA plasma, especially for research purposes in large pharmacological trials where samples can be stored for long periods before they are assayed.
生化骨转换标志物是评估骨重塑的有用工具。I 型胶原 C 端肽(ß-CTX)已被推荐为研究中骨吸收的参考标志物。
我们描述了一项用于常规临床实验室检测血清和血浆中ß-CTX 的多中心研究结果。四个中心(希腊雅典、丹麦哥本哈根、比利时列日和英国谢菲尔德)从骨质疏松症诊所就诊的 796 名患者中收集了血清和血浆(EDTA)样本。根据制造商的说明,按照可用的常规临床实验室方法对每种方法进行了双份分析。使用 Passing-Bablok 回归、Bland-Altman 图、V 形评价方法和血清与血浆标本之间以及方法之间的 ß-CTX 值的一致性相关系数来确定结果之间的一致性。采用广义线性模型来确定可能影响方法之间关系的变量。最后制备了两个血清池,并将其发送至四个中心,用不同的方法在 5 天内连续测量 5 次。
我们发现方法之间以及中心之间存在显著差异,尽管与血清相比,血浆中的结果通常更一致。我们开发了单变量线性回归方程,以预测罗氏 Elecsys®、IDS-iSYS 或 IDS ELISA ß-CTX 结果来自任何其他检测方法,以及包括分析部位、患者年龄和体重的多变量模型。单变量模型的决定系数(R)从约 0.80 增加到多变量模型的约 0.90,其中分析部位是主要影响因素。对池中的结果也表明,长期储存可能是解释不同方法在血清中观察到的差异的原因之一。
我们的结果表明,ß-CTX 测量的内部和外部检测差异较大,特别是在血清中。分析物的稳定性可能是其中一个解释。应进行更多的研究来克服这个问题。在实现协调之前,我们建议在 EDTA 血浆中使用相同的检测方法测量ß-CTX,特别是在大型药理学试验中,这些样本在进行检测之前可以储存很长时间用于研究。