Suppr超能文献

足月新生羔羊的鼻腔呼吸支持和呼吸急促及经口喂养。

Nasal respiratory support and tachypnea and oral feeding in full-term newborn lambs.

机构信息

Neonatal Respiratory Research Unit, Departments of Pediatrics and Pharmacology-Physiology, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

Centre d'imagerie moléculaire de Sherbrooke (CIMS), Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

J Appl Physiol (1985). 2021 May 1;130(5):1436-1447. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00567.2020. Epub 2021 Mar 4.

Abstract

Newborn infants with respiratory difficulties frequently require nasal respiratory support such as nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) or high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC). Oral feeding of these infants under nasal respiratory support remains controversial out of fear of aspiration and cardiorespiratory events. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the safety of oral feeding under different types of nasal respiratory support in newborn lambs without or with tachypnea. Eight lambs aged 4-5 days were instrumented to record sucking, swallowing, respiration, ECG, oxygen saturation, and arterial blood gases. Each lamb was given two bottles of 30 mL of milk with a pause of 30 s under videofluoroscopy in four conditions [no respiratory support, nCPAP 6 cmHO, HFNC 7 L/min, HFNC (= HFNC 7 L/min + CPAP 6 cmHO)] administered in random order. The study was conducted in random order over 2 days, with or without standardized tachypnea induced by thoracic compression with a blood pressure cuff. Generalized linear mixed models were used to compare the four nasal respiratory supports in terms of safety (cardiorespiratory events and aspiration), sucking-swallowing-breathing coordination, and efficacy of oral feeding. Results reveal that no nasal respiratory support impaired the safety of oral feeding. Most of the few laryngeal penetrations we observed occurred with HFNC. Nasal CPAP modified sucking-swallowing-breathing coordination, whereas the efficiency of oral feeding decreased under HFNC. Results were similar with or without tachypnea. In conclusion, oral feeding under nasal respiratory support is generally safe in a term lamb, even with tachypnea. The practice of orally feeding newborns suffering from respiratory problems while on nCPAP or HFNC remains controversial for fear of triggering cardiorespiratory events or aspiration pneumonia, or aggravating chronic lung disease. The present results show that bottle-feeding is generally safe in full-term lambs under nasal respiratory support, both without and with tachypnea.

摘要

患有呼吸窘迫的新生儿常需接受鼻腔呼吸支持,如鼻塞持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)或高流量鼻导管(HFNC)。由于担心吸入和心肺事件,在接受这些鼻腔呼吸支持的同时进行口腔喂养仍存在争议。本研究的主要目的是评估在无或有呼吸急促的情况下,不同类型的鼻腔呼吸支持下对新生儿进行口腔喂养的安全性。8 只 4-5 日龄的羔羊接受了仪器检测,以记录吸吮、吞咽、呼吸、心电图、血氧饱和度和动脉血气。在四种条件下(无呼吸支持、nCPAP 6cmH2O、HFNC 7L/min、HFNC(=HFNC 7L/min+CPAP 6cmH2O)),在视频透视下每只羔羊各给予 30ml 牛奶 2 瓶,间隔 30s。研究在 2 天内随机进行,有或无通过血压袖带对胸部进行压缩来标准化呼吸急促。使用广义线性混合模型比较了四种鼻腔呼吸支持在安全性(心肺事件和吸入)、吸吮-吞咽-呼吸协调性以及口腔喂养效果方面的差异。结果表明,无鼻腔呼吸支持会降低口腔喂养的安全性。我们观察到的大部分轻微的喉穿透发生在 HFNC 时。鼻 CPAP 改变了吸吮-吞咽-呼吸协调性,而在 HFNC 下,口腔喂养的效率降低。有无呼吸急促时结果相似。总之,在足月羔羊中,即使有呼吸急促,在接受鼻腔呼吸支持时进行口腔喂养通常是安全的。由于担心引发心肺事件或吸入性肺炎,或加重慢性肺部疾病,对患有呼吸问题的新生儿在 nCPAP 或 HFNC 时进行经口喂养的做法仍存在争议。本研究结果表明,在接受鼻腔呼吸支持的足月羔羊中,无论是在无呼吸急促还是有呼吸急促的情况下,奶瓶喂养通常是安全的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验