NHC Key Lab of Health Economics and Policy Research, Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250012, China.
Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(4):1940. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041940.
Our aim was to evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention for residents in rural China on knowledge, attitudes and reported practices (KAP) on antibiotic use in humans and pigs. A quasi-experimental study was conducted in 12 villages in rural Shandong province, divided into intervention and control groups, covering a two-year period from July 2015 to June 2017. A package of health education-based interventions including training sessions, speakerphone messages, posters and handbooks for residents was developed and implemented over a one-year period to improve the use of antibiotics in humans and pigs. The intervention net effects were evaluated by Difference-in-Difference (DID) analysis based on responses to a questionnaire concerning KAP towards antibiotic use in humans and pigs. A total of 629 participants completed both baseline and post-trial questionnaires, including 127 participants with backyard pig farms. Significant improvements were found in KAP towards antibiotic use in humans, but changes related to antibiotic use for pigs were not significant. Participants who were in the intervention group ( < 0.001) were more likely to have improved their knowledge on antibiotic use in humans. Participants who had higher attitude scores were less likely to report self-medicating with stored antibiotics in the previous year ( < 0.001). Our results suggest that our health education-based intervention was effective in improving KAP on human antibiotic use, but it had little effect regarding antibiotic use for pigs.
我们的目的是评估中国农村地区一项针对居民的干预措施在人类和猪用抗生素知识、态度和报告实践(KAP)方面的效果。这项准实验研究在山东省的 12 个农村村庄进行,分为干预组和对照组,涵盖了从 2015 年 7 月至 2017 年 6 月的两年时间。我们开发并实施了一整套基于健康教育的干预措施,包括培训课程、扬声器信息、海报和居民手册,以改善人类和猪用抗生素的使用。通过基于问卷调查的 KAP 对人类和猪用抗生素的回答的差异分析(DID)评估干预净效果。共有 629 名参与者完成了基线和试验后问卷,其中包括 127 名有后院养猪场的参与者。在人类抗生素使用的 KAP 方面发现了显著的改善,但与猪用抗生素使用相关的变化并不显著。处于干预组的参与者(<0.001)更有可能提高他们对人类抗生素使用的知识。具有较高态度得分的参与者在过去一年中更不可能报告自行使用储存的抗生素(<0.001)。我们的研究结果表明,我们的基于健康教育的干预措施在提高人类抗生素使用的 KAP 方面是有效的,但对于猪用抗生素的使用影响不大。