Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil; Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Universidade de Santo Amaro (UNISA), Santo Amaro, Brazil.
Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Escola Paulista de Medicina, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil; Orthopedics and Traumatology Department, Universidade de Santo Amaro (UNISA), Santo Amaro, Brazil.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2021 Aug;30(8):1834-1843. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.013. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
The shoulder physical examination is frequently performed to diagnose rotator cuff tears in clinical practice; however, there is insufficient evidence on which physical tests are efficient for shoulder impingements in primary care settings. The purposes of this study were (1) to analyze the accuracy of 8 clinical tests to diagnose supraspinatus tendon lesions and investigate whether the combination of these tests can improve the diagnostic values; (2) to assess which are the best positivity criteria for shoulder maneuvers-pain and/or weakness; and (3) to investigate the ability of these tests to distinguish between partial- and full-thickness tears.
A total of 733 consecutive patients were prospectively evaluated by 4 shoulder surgeons in this multicenter diagnostic study from May 2017 to December 2018, and 8 clinical tests (empty-can, full-can test, drop arm, painful arc, Neer sign, Hawkins test, Patte test, and resisted external rotation) were compared with magnetic resonance imaging performed by blinded radiologists. We assessed the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for all tests.
For overall supraspinatus tears, the empty-can test showed the highest sensitivity (0.81), the Patte test (positive for pain and weakness) and the drop-arm test showed the highest specificity (0.99 and 0.98, respectively), and the best combination was the Neer sign and the drop-arm test (DOR, 12.92). The positivity criteria for pain associated with weakness showed the highest performance, with DORs of 16.94 for the Patte test and 10.45 for the empty-can test. The Patte test and resisted external rotation, positive for pain and weakness, showed the highest ability to distinguish between full- and partial-thickness tears (DOR, 5.69 and 5.35, respectively). The shoulder maneuvers showed low negative predictive values; the highest value (0.58) was found with the empty-can test.
(1) The clinical tests demonstrated excellent diagnostic values; the empty-can test had the highest sensitivity, whereas the drop-arm test and the Patte test had the highest specificity; and the best combination for detecting supraspinatus tears was the Neer sign and the drop-arm test. On the other hand, the physical examination findings showed limited values to rule out tears. (2) The best positivity criterion for shoulder maneuvers was pain associated with weakness. (3) The Patte test and resisted external rotation showed the highest ability to distinguish between full- and partial-thickness tears.
在临床实践中,常进行肩部体格检查以诊断肩袖撕裂,但初级保健环境中用于肩峰下撞击的体格检查证据不足。本研究的目的是:(1)分析 8 种临床检查诊断冈上肌腱病变的准确性,并探讨这些检查的联合应用是否能提高诊断价值;(2)评估肩部运动时疼痛和/或无力的阳性标准;(3)研究这些检查对区分部分厚度和全厚度撕裂的能力。
本多中心诊断研究于 2017 年 5 月至 2018 年 12 月连续前瞻性评估了 733 例连续患者,由 4 位肩部外科医生进行评估,并将 8 种临床检查(空罐试验、满罐试验、垂臂试验、疼痛弧、Neer 征、Hawkins 试验、Patte 试验和抗外部旋转试验)与盲法放射科医生进行的磁共振成像进行比较。我们评估了所有检查的敏感性、特异性、准确性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值及诊断比值比(DOR)。
对于总体的冈上肌腱撕裂,空罐试验的敏感性最高(0.81),Patte 试验(阳性时疼痛和无力)和垂臂试验的特异性最高(0.99 和 0.98),最佳联合检查是 Neer 征和垂臂试验(DOR 为 12.92)。疼痛合并无力的阳性标准具有最高的效能,Patte 试验和空罐试验的 DOR 分别为 16.94 和 10.45。阳性时疼痛和无力的 Patte 试验和抗外部旋转试验具有最高的全层和部分层撕裂的区分能力(DOR 分别为 5.69 和 5.35)。肩部运动的阴性预测值较低,空罐试验的阴性预测值最高(0.58)。
(1)临床检查具有良好的诊断价值;空罐试验的敏感性最高,垂臂试验和 Patte 试验的特异性最高;检测冈上肌腱撕裂的最佳联合检查是 Neer 征和垂臂试验。另一方面,体格检查结果对排除撕裂的价值有限。(2)肩部运动的最佳阳性标准是疼痛合并无力。(3)Patte 试验和抗外部旋转试验具有最高的区分全层和部分层撕裂的能力。