Silva E Silva Vanessa, Schirmer Janine, Roza Bartira D'Aguiar, de Oliveira Priscilla Caroliny, Dhanani Sonny, Almost Joan, Schafer Markus, Tranmer Joan
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
School of Nursing, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Can J Kidney Health Dis. 2021 Feb 20;8:2054358121992921. doi: 10.1177/2054358121992921. eCollection 2021.
Well-established performance measures for organ donation programs do not fully address the complexity and multifactorial nature of organ donation programs such as the influence of relationships and organizational attributes.
To synthesize the current evidence on key organizational attributes and processes of international organ donation programs associated with successful outcomes and to generate a framework to categorize those attributes.
Scoping Review using a mixed methods approach for data extraction.
Databases included PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, LILACS, ABI Business ProQuest, Business Source Premier, and gray literature (organ donation association websites, Google Scholar-first 8 pages), and searches for gray literature were performed, and relevant websites were perused.
Organ donation programs or processes.
We systematically searched the literature to identify any research design, including text and opinion papers and unpublished material (research data, reports, institutional protocols, government documents, etc). Searches were completed on January 2018, updated it in May 2019, and lastly in March 2020. Title, abstracts, and full texts were screened independently by 2 reviewers with disagreements resolved by a third. Data extraction followed a mixed method approach in which we extracted specific details about study characteristics such as type of research, year of publication, origin/country of study, type of journal published, and key findings. Studies included considered definitions and descriptions of success in organ donation programs in any country by considering studies that described (1) attributes associated with success or effectiveness, (2) organ donation processes, (3) quality improvement initiatives, (4) definitions of organ donation program effectiveness, (5) evidence-based practices in organ donation, and (6) improvements or success in such programs. We tabulated the type and frequency of the presence or absence of reported improvement quality indicators and used a qualitative thematic analysis approach to synthesize results.
A total of 84 articles were included. Quantitative analysis identified that most of the included articles originated from the United States (n = 32, 38%), used quantitative approaches (n = 46, 55%), and were published in transplant journals (n = 34, 40.5%). Qualitative analysis revealed 16 categories that were described as positively influencing success/effectiveness of organ donation programs. Our thematic analysis identified 16 attributes across the 84 articles, which were grouped into 3 categories influencing organ donation programs' success: (n = 39, 46%), (n = 48, 57%), and (n = 59, 70%).
Consistent with scoping review methodology, the methodological quality of included studies was not assessed.
This scoping review identified a number of factors that led to successful outcomes. However, those factors were rarely studied in combination representing a gap in the literature. Therefore, we suggest the development and reporting of primary research investigating and measuring those attributes associated with the performance of organ donation programs holistically.
Not applicable.
成熟的器官捐赠项目绩效衡量标准并未充分考虑器官捐赠项目的复杂性和多因素性质,如人际关系和组织属性的影响。
综合当前关于与成功结果相关的国际器官捐赠项目关键组织属性和流程的证据,并生成一个对这些属性进行分类的框架。
采用混合方法进行数据提取的范围综述。
数据库包括PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、LILACS、ABI商业ProQuest、商业资源全文数据库以及灰色文献(器官捐赠协会网站、谷歌学术搜索的前8页),并进行了灰色文献搜索,浏览了相关网站。
器官捐赠项目或流程。
我们系统地检索文献,以识别任何研究设计,包括文本和观点论文以及未发表的材料(研究数据、报告、机构协议、政府文件等)。检索于2018年1月完成,2019年5月更新,最后于2020年3月进行。标题、摘要和全文由2名评审员独立筛选,如有分歧则由第三名评审员解决。数据提取采用混合方法,我们提取了关于研究特征的具体细节,如研究类型、发表年份、研究来源/国家、发表期刊类型和主要发现。纳入的研究通过考虑描述以下内容的研究来考量任何国家器官捐赠项目成功的定义和描述:(1)与成功或有效性相关的属性;(2)器官捐赠流程;(3)质量改进举措;(4)器官捐赠项目有效性的定义;(5)器官捐赠的循证实践;(6)此类项目的改进或成功。我们将报告的改进质量指标的类型和出现频率制成表格,并采用定性主题分析方法来综合结果。
共纳入84篇文章。定量分析表明,大多数纳入文章来自美国(n = 32,38%),采用定量方法(n = 46,55%),并发表在移植期刊上(n = 34,40.5%)。定性分析揭示了16个被描述为对器官捐赠项目的成功/有效性有积极影响的类别。我们的主题分析在84篇文章中确定了16个属性,这些属性被分为影响器官捐赠项目成功的3个类别:(n = 39,46%)、(n = 48,57%)和(n = 59,70%)。
与范围综述方法一致,未评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
本范围综述确定了一些导致成功结果的因素。然而,这些因素很少被综合研究,这代表了文献中的一个空白。因此,我们建议开展和报告对与器官捐赠项目绩效相关的那些属性进行全面调查和测量的原始研究。
不适用。