Suppr超能文献

创伤大量输血评分用于预测创伤中的大量输血情况。

Massive Blood Transfusion for Trauma Score to Predict Massive Blood Transfusion in Trauma.

作者信息

Akaraborworn Osaree, Siribumrungwong Boonying, Sangthong Burapat, Thongkhao Komet

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Critical Care, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Thailand.

Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Thammasat University Hospital, Khlong Nueng, Pathum Thani, Thailand.

出版信息

Crit Care Res Pract. 2021 Feb 24;2021:3165390. doi: 10.1155/2021/3165390. eCollection 2021.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Massive blood loss is the most common cause of immediate death in trauma. A massive blood transfusion (MBT) score is a prediction tool to activate blood banks to prepare blood products. The previously published scoring systems were mostly developed from settings that had mature prehospital systems which may lead to a failure to validate in settings with immature prehospital systems. This research aimed to develop a massive blood transfusion for trauma (MBTT) score that is able to predict MBT in settings that have immature prehospital care.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort that collected data from trauma patients who met the trauma team activation criteria. The predicting parameters included in the analysis were retrieved from the history, physical examination, and initial laboratory results. The significant parameters from a multivariable analysis were used to develop a clinical scoring system. The discrimination was evaluated by the area under a receiver operating characteristic (AuROC) curve. The calibration was demonstrated with Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness of fit, and an internal validation was done.

RESULTS

Among 867 patients, 102 (11.8%) patients received MBT. Four factors were associated with MBT: a score of 3 for age ≥60 years; 2.5 for base excess ≤-10 mEq/L; 2 for lactate >4 mmol/L; and 1 for heart rate ≥105 /min. The AuROC was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91). At the cut point of ≥4, the positive likelihood ratio of the score was 6.72 (95% CI: 4.7-9.6,  < 0.001), the sensitivity was 63.6%, and the specificity was 90.5%. Internal validation with bootstrap replications had an AuROC of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.75-0.91).

CONCLUSIONS

The MBTT score has good discrimination to predict MBT with simple and rapidly obtainable parameters.

摘要

背景

大量失血是创伤后立即死亡的最常见原因。大量输血(MBT)评分是一种预测工具,用于促使血库准备血液制品。先前公布的评分系统大多是在院前系统成熟的环境中开发的,这可能导致在院前系统不成熟的环境中无法进行验证。本研究旨在开发一种创伤大量输血(MBTT)评分,以预测院前护理不成熟环境中的大量输血情况。

方法

本研究为回顾性队列研究,收集符合创伤团队激活标准的创伤患者的数据。分析中纳入的预测参数从病史、体格检查和初始实验室结果中获取。多变量分析中的显著参数用于建立临床评分系统。通过受试者操作特征(AuROC)曲线下面积评估鉴别能力。用Hosmer-Lemeshow拟合优度进行校准,并进行内部验证。

结果

867例患者中,102例(11.8%)接受了大量输血。与大量输血相关的四个因素为:年龄≥60岁得3分;碱剩余≤-10 mEq/L得2.5分;乳酸>4 mmol/L得2分;心率≥105次/分得1分。AuROC为0.85(95%CI:0.78-0.91)。在≥4的切点处,该评分的阳性似然比为6.72(95%CI:4.7-9.6,P<0.001),敏感性为63.6%,特异性为90.5%。通过自举复制进行的内部验证的AuROC为0.83(95%CI:0.75-0.91)。

结论

MBTT评分具有良好的鉴别能力,可通过简单且快速获取的参数预测大量输血情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验