Suppr超能文献

克林霉素/维 A 酸与阿达帕林/过氧苯甲酰治疗寻常痤疮的耐受性和疗效比较。

Tolerability and Efficacy of Clindamycin/Tretinoin versus Adapalene/Benzoyl Peroxide in the Treatment of Acne Vulgaris.

出版信息

J Drugs Dermatol. 2021 Mar 1;20(3):295-301. doi: 10.36849/JDD.2021.5641.

Abstract

Acne vulgaris is the most common dermatological disorder worldwide, causing significant physical and psychological morbidity. Topical combination therapy has shown superior efficacy compared to monotherapy, especially when combined with retinoids. Few studies have directly compared combined formulations. This evaluator-blinded pilot study compared the efficacy and tolerability of two marketed topical combination acne gels, clindamycin 1%-tretinoin 0.025% (CT) and benzoyl peroxide 2.5%-adapalene 0.1% (BA) in 20 patients with mild to moderate acne vulgaris. Gels were applied daily on opposite sides of the face for 21 days. The primary outcome was difference in transepidermal water loss (TEWL) at the end of treatment. Secondary endpoints were skin moisture content measurement, Investigators' Global Assessment, subject self-assessments (SSA) of burning/stinging, itching, erythema, and dryness/scaling, and Comparative Participant Satisfaction Questionnaire (CPSQ). Efficacy was assessed by inflammatory and non- inflammatory acne efflorescences counts. TEWL increased significantly for both CT and BA (+57.74%, P=0.002; +58.77%, P<0.001); skin moisture content significantly decreased only for BA (-16.47%, P=0.02). Only BA showed a significant increase in erythema and dryness/scaling (P=0.027 and P=0.014) and in SSA burning/stinging (P=0.04). Patient satisfaction evaluation also reflected the strong BA irritation. Although CT and BA both reduced acne lesions (P<0.001) and more patients preferred to continue with CT, subject perception of acne improvement was higher for BA. These findings suggest that CT and BA have similar efficacy in the treatment of mild to moderate papulopustular acne. However, CT was better tolerated than BA by both medical and subject evaluation. CT is an effective and tolerated treatment option.J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(3):295-301. doi:10.36849/JDD.2021.5641.

摘要

寻常痤疮是全球最常见的皮肤病,会导致明显的身心发病率。局部联合治疗与单药治疗相比显示出更好的疗效,尤其是与维 A 酸联合使用时。很少有研究直接比较联合制剂。这项评估者盲法的初步研究比较了两种市售的局部联合痤疮凝胶的疗效和耐受性,克林霉素 1%-维 A 酸 0.025%(CT)和过氧化苯甲酰 2.5%-阿达帕林 0.1%(BA),用于 20 例轻至中度寻常痤疮患者。凝胶每天在面部两侧涂抹,共 21 天。主要结局是治疗结束时经表皮水分丢失(TEWL)的差异。次要终点是皮肤水分含量测量、研究者总体评估、患者自我评估(SSA)的烧灼感/刺痛感、瘙痒、红斑和干燥/脱屑,以及比较参与者满意度问卷(CPSQ)。疗效通过炎症性和非炎症性痤疮皮损计数来评估。CT 和 BA 的 TEWL 均显著增加(+57.74%,P=0.002;+58.77%,P<0.001);仅 BA 的皮肤水分含量显著降低(-16.47%,P=0.02)。只有 BA 显示出红斑和干燥/脱屑(P=0.027 和 P=0.014)以及 SSA 烧灼感/刺痛感(P=0.04)的显著增加。患者满意度评估也反映了 BA 的强烈刺激性。尽管 CT 和 BA 均能减少痤疮皮损(P<0.001),且更多患者愿意继续使用 CT,但 BA 更能提高患者对痤疮改善的感知。这些发现表明 CT 和 BA 在治疗轻至中度丘疹脓疱性痤疮方面具有相似的疗效。然而,CT 在医学和患者评估方面均比 BA 更耐受。CT 是一种有效且耐受良好的治疗选择。J 皮肤病药物杂志。2021;20(3):295-301. doi:10.36849/JDD.2021.5641.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验