Suppr超能文献

肾上腺素自动注射器给药的理想体位。

Ideal body position for epinephrine autoinjector administration.

机构信息

From the Department of Medicine, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, Washington.

Department of Allergy/Immunology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2021 Mar 21;42(2):147-152. doi: 10.2500/aap.2021.42.200108.

Abstract

Epinephrine is the first-line therapy for patients with anaphylaxis, and intramuscular (IM) delivery is shown to be superior to subcutaneous (SC) delivery. There currently is no consensus on the ideal body position for epinephrine autoinjector (EAI) administration. We designed this study to investigate whether SC tissue depth (SCTD) is affected by body position ( standing, sitting, supine), which can potentially impact delivery of EAI into the IM space. Volunteer adults (ages ≥ 18 years) from a military medical treatment facility in the United States were recruited to participate in this study. SCTD of the vastus lateralis was measured via ultrasound at standing, sitting, and supine body positions. Subjects' age, sex, and body mass index (BMI) were collected. Statistical analysis was performed to compare average SCTD between body positions, sex, and BMI. An analysis of variance of 51 participants (33 men and 18 women) did not reveal statistically significant difference in SCTD among standing, sitting, and supine body positions. It did show a significantly greater SCTD in women than in men (2.72 ± 1.36 cm versus 1.10 ± 0.38 cm; < 0.001). There was no significant association observed between BMI and SCTD in this study. Body position did not seem to significantly change the distance between skin and thigh muscle in adults. This would suggest that there might not be an ideal body position for EAI administration. Therefore, in case of anaphylaxis, prompt administration of epinephrine is recommended at any position.

摘要

肾上腺素是治疗过敏反应患者的一线药物,肌肉内(IM)给药优于皮下(SC)给药。目前对于肾上腺素自动注射器(EAI)给药的理想体位尚无共识。我们设计了这项研究,以调查 SC 组织深度(SCTD)是否受体位(站立、坐、仰卧)的影响,这可能会影响 EAI 注入 IM 空间。我们在美国的一家军事医疗机构招募了成年志愿者(年龄≥18 岁)参加这项研究。通过超声在站立、坐、仰卧体位下测量股外侧肌的 SCTD。收集受试者的年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI)。对体位、性别和 BMI 之间的平均 SCTD 进行方差分析。对 51 名参与者(33 名男性和 18 名女性)进行方差分析,结果显示,站立、坐、仰卧体位之间的 SCTD 无统计学差异。结果显示,女性的 SCTD 显著大于男性(2.72±1.36cm 比 1.10±0.38cm;<0.001)。在这项研究中,BMI 与 SCTD 之间没有观察到显著关联。体位似乎并没有显著改变成年人皮肤与大腿肌肉之间的距离。这表明 EAI 给药可能没有理想的体位。因此,在发生过敏反应时,建议在任何体位下迅速给予肾上腺素。

相似文献

1
Ideal body position for epinephrine autoinjector administration.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2021 Mar 21;42(2):147-152. doi: 10.2500/aap.2021.42.200108.
2
Ideal body position for epinephrine autoinjector administration.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2020 Dec 21. doi: 10.2500/aap.2020.42.200108).
3
Adequacy of the epinephrine autoinjector needle length in delivering epinephrine to the intramuscular tissues.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 May;94(5):539-42. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61130-1.
4
Predictors of epinephrine autoinjector needle length inadequacy.
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Dec;31(12):1671-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.09.001. Epub 2013 Oct 4.
5
Frequencies and predictors of subcutaneous and intraosseous injection with 4 epinephrine autoinjector devices.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Aug;133(2):194-202.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 11.
7
Allergy and Asthma: Anaphylaxis.
FP Essent. 2018 Sep;472:20-24.
8
Inadequacy of current pediatric epinephrine autoinjector needle length for use in infants and toddlers.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Jun;118(6):719-725.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.03.017. Epub 2017 May 6.
9
Autoinjectors Preferred for Intramuscular Epinephrine in Anaphylaxis and Allergic Reactions.
West J Emerg Med. 2016 Nov;17(6):775-782. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2016.8.30505. Epub 2016 Oct 7.
10
Human factors engineering validation study for a novel 0.1-mg epinephrine auto-injector.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2018 Nov 1;39(6):461-465. doi: 10.2500/aap.2018.39.4171. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

引用本文的文献

1
The Needle Shield Size and Applied Force of Subcutaneous Autoinjectors Significantly Influence the Injection Depth.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Feb 22:19322968241231996. doi: 10.1177/19322968241231996.
2
The 2020 update on anaphylaxis in paediatric population.
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2022 Feb;39(1):13-19. doi: 10.5114/ada.2021.103327. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
3
Hereditary angioedema again revisited.
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2021 Mar 1;42(2):105-107. doi: 10.2500/aap.2021.42.210009.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Sex Differences in Body Composition.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2017;1043:9-27. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-70178-3_2.
4
Contemporary issues in anaphylaxis and the evolution of epinephrine autoinjectors: What will the future bring?
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2017 Oct;119(4):333-338. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.07.030.
5
The pathophysiology of anaphylaxis.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Aug;140(2):335-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.06.003.
6
Epinephrine for First-aid Management of Anaphylaxis.
Pediatrics. 2017 Mar;139(3). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-4006. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
7
Trends in Obesity Among Adults in the United States, 2005 to 2014.
JAMA. 2016 Jun 7;315(21):2284-91. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.6458.
8
Epinephrine auto-injector needle length: what is the ideal length?
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Aug;16(4):361-5. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000283.
9
Anaphylaxis--a practice parameter update 2015.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Nov;115(5):341-84. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.07.019.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验