Department of Ecology and Genetics, University of Oulu, Pentti Kaiteran katu 1, Oulu, 90014, Finland.
Department of Biology, Tufts University, 200 College Avenue, Medford, Massachusetts, 02155, USA.
Ecology. 2021 Jun;102(6):e03322. doi: 10.1002/ecy.3322. Epub 2021 May 20.
Life history theories analyze and predict variation in vital rates, such as survival and reproduction, based on age. The age-from-stage method to derive age-specific vital rates from stage data was developed because age-specific data are rarely obtained for plants. Age-specific vital rates derived by this method might underestimate effects of age on vital rates, because the models assume that vital rates do not vary within stage classes. Consequently, population models and life history summaries relying on these vital rates could be biased against detecting senescence. Here, we perform a comparative study of methods to estimate age-specific vital rates using monitoring data with known age and stage. We derived age-, stage-, and age-and-stage-specific vital rates with demographic data from a long-lived perennial, Silene spaldingii. Then, we derived three age-specific population matrix models (age, age-from-stage, and age-and-stage). For each model, we derived life history summaries commonly used in ecology: population growth rate, net reproductive value, relative reproductive values, stable age distribution, generation time, and sensitivity and elasticity of population growth rate. Many vital rates depended on both age and stage in S. spaldingii. However, this species does not senesce; in fact, the number of flowers increased with age. As expected, the age-from-stage method was not able to accurately recreate the age dependence in some life history summaries, such as relative reproductive value. The age-from-stage model suggested faster reproductive dynamics in S. spaldingii than the models based on known age, i.e., plants started to reproduce earlier, and fertility remained constant thereafter, which may lead to biased predictions about evolutionary consequences of age-dependent life history traits. However, population growth rate, generation time, and net reproductive rate did not differ significantly among the models. Our study demonstrated that some metrics are robust to imprecision in model structure, while others are more sensitive. In spite of these biases, this case study provides another example of the diversity of aging patterns in plants. Age can be essential information when studying senescence in plants, but demographic metrics that were not about age per se were similar across model structures.
生命史理论根据年龄分析和预测关键生活史特征(如存活率和繁殖率)的变化。从阶段数据中推导出特定年龄的关键生活史特征的阶段-年龄方法是因为很少获得植物的特定年龄数据。通过这种方法推导出的特定年龄的关键生活史特征可能会低估年龄对关键生活史特征的影响,因为模型假设关键生活史特征在阶段类内不会变化。因此,依赖这些关键生活史特征的种群模型和生命史总结可能会对检测衰老产生偏差。在这里,我们使用具有已知年龄和阶段的监测数据对估计特定年龄的关键生活史特征的方法进行了比较研究。我们从一种长寿命的多年生植物 Silene spaldingii 的人口统计数据中推导出了特定年龄、阶段和年龄与阶段的关键生活史特征。然后,我们从三个特定年龄的种群矩阵模型(年龄、年龄-阶段和年龄-阶段)中推导出了三个模型。对于每个模型,我们都推导出了生态学中常用的生命史总结:种群增长率、净生殖值、相对生殖值、稳定年龄分布、世代时间以及种群增长率的敏感性和弹性。许多关键生活史特征在 S. spaldingii 中都取决于年龄和阶段。然而,该物种并不衰老;实际上,花朵数量随着年龄的增加而增加。正如预期的那样,年龄-阶段方法无法准确再现某些生命史总结中的年龄依赖性,例如相对生殖值。年龄-阶段模型表明,S. spaldingii 的生殖动态比基于已知年龄的模型更快,即植物更早开始繁殖,此后生育能力保持不变,这可能会对年龄依赖的生活史特征的进化后果产生有偏差的预测。然而,种群增长率、世代时间和净生殖率在模型之间没有显著差异。我们的研究表明,某些指标对模型结构的不精确性具有鲁棒性,而其他指标则更敏感。尽管存在这些偏差,但本案例研究提供了植物衰老模式多样性的另一个例子。在研究植物衰老时,年龄可能是至关重要的信息,但与年龄本身无关的人口统计指标在不同的模型结构中是相似的。