• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管迷走性晕厥致伤的可能性:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Likelihood of injury due to vasovagal syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Cardiac Sciences, Libin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, 3280 Hospital Drive NW, Calgary, Alberta T2N 4Z6, Canada.

Clinica Fit Labor Centro de Performance Humana, Niteroi, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

出版信息

Europace. 2021 Jul 18;23(7):1092-1099. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab041.

DOI:10.1093/europace/euab041
PMID:33693816
Abstract

AIMS

Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most common type of syncope and is usually considered a benign disorder. The potential for injury is worrisome but the likelihood is unknown. We aimed to determine the proportion of patients injured due to VVS.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of studies published until August 2020 was performed in multiple medical and nursing databases. Included studies had data on the proportion of patients with injury due to VVS prior to study enrolment. Random effects methods were used. Twenty-three studies having 3593 patients met inclusion criteria. Patients were diagnosed clinically with VVS, and 82% had >2 syncopal episodes before enrolment. Tilt test was positive in 60% and 14 studies reported comorbidities (32.6% hypertensive). The weighted mean injury rate was 33.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 27.3-40.5%]. The likelihood of injury correlated with population age (r = 0.4, P = 0.05), but not with sex, positive tilt test, or hypertension. The injury rates were 25.7% (95% CI: 19.1-32.8%) in studies with younger patients (mean age ≤50 years, n = 1803) and 43.4% (95% CI: 34.9-52.3%) in studies with older patients (P = 0.002). Nine studies reported major injuries; with a weighted mean rate of major injuries of 13.9% (95% CI: 9.5-19.8%).

CONCLUSION

Injuries due to syncope are frequent, occurring in 33% of patients with VVS. The risk of major injuries is substantial. Older patients are at higher risk. Clinicians should be aware of the risk of injuries when providing care and advice to patients with VVS.

摘要

目的

血管迷走性晕厥(VVS)是最常见的晕厥类型,通常被认为是一种良性疾病。但 VVS 具有潜在的受伤风险,其可能性尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定因 VVS 而受伤的患者比例。

方法和结果

我们对截至 2020 年 8 月发表的研究进行了系统检索,检索范围包括多个医学和护理数据库。纳入的研究均提供了研究入组前因 VVS 受伤患者的比例数据。采用随机效应模型进行分析。共有 23 项研究,纳入 3593 例患者,符合纳入标准。所有患者均经临床诊断为 VVS,82%的患者在入组前有>2 次晕厥发作。60%的患者倾斜试验阳性,14 项研究报告了合并症(32.6%为高血压)。加权平均损伤率为 33.5%[95%置信区间(CI):27.3-40.5%]。损伤的可能性与人群年龄相关(r=0.4,P=0.05),但与性别、倾斜试验阳性或高血压无关。在纳入年轻患者(平均年龄≤50 岁,n=1803)的研究中,损伤发生率为 25.7%(95%CI:19.1-32.8%),而在纳入年龄较大患者(n=1790)的研究中,损伤发生率为 43.4%(95%CI:34.9-52.3%),两组间差异有统计学意义(P=0.002)。9 项研究报告了重大损伤,重大损伤的加权平均发生率为 13.9%(95%CI:9.5-19.8%)。

结论

因晕厥而受伤的情况较为常见,VVS 患者中有 33%受伤。重大损伤的风险较高,老年患者风险更高。临床医生在为 VVS 患者提供护理和建议时,应意识到受伤的风险。

相似文献

1
Likelihood of injury due to vasovagal syncope: a systematic review and meta-analysis.血管迷走性晕厥致伤的可能性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Europace. 2021 Jul 18;23(7):1092-1099. doi: 10.1093/europace/euab041.
2
Clinical Associations of Injuries Caused by Vasovagal Syncope: A Cohort Study From a Tertiary Syncope Unit.血管迷走性晕厥所致损伤的临床关联:来自三级晕厥单位的队列研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2023 Jan 3;12(1):e027272. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.122.027272. Epub 2022 Dec 24.
3
Efficacy of tilt training in patients with vasovagal syncope.倾斜训练对血管迷走性晕厥患者的疗效。
Kardiol Pol. 2006 Jun;64(6):602-8; discussion 609-10.
4
Association between vitamin D deficiency and vasovagal syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis.维生素 D 缺乏与血管迷走性晕厥的相关性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Cardiol. 2023 Jul;46(7):721-728. doi: 10.1002/clc.24035. Epub 2023 May 24.
5
Frequency of injuries associated with syncope in the prevention of syncope trials.预防晕厥试验中与晕厥相关的损伤发生率。
Europace. 2020 Dec 23;22(12):1896-1903. doi: 10.1093/europace/euaa246.
6
Relationship between hemodynamic type and syncopal symptoms in pediatric vasovagal syncope.小儿血管迷走性晕厥的血流动力学类型与晕厥症状之间的关系
Eur J Pediatr. 2024 Jan;183(1):179-184. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-05278-5. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
7
Are women really more affected by vasovagal syncope than men?女性真的比男性更容易受到血管迷走性晕厥的影响吗?
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2021 Feb 1;22(2):69-78. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001009.
8
Clinical Characteristics and Outcome of Patients with Situational Syncope Compared to Patients with Vasovagal Syncope.情境性晕厥患者与血管迷走性晕厥患者的临床特征及预后比较
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2017 May;40(5):591-595. doi: 10.1111/pace.13069. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
9
The Differences in the Diagnostic Profile in Children with Vasovagal Syncope between the Result of Head-Up Tilt Table Test.血管迷走性晕厥患儿直立倾斜试验结果与诊断特征的差异。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 23;17(12):4524. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17124524.
10
Tilt-induced vasovagal syncope and psychogenic pseudosyncope: Overlapping clinical entities.倾斜诱发的血管迷走性晕厥和心因性假性晕厥:重叠的临床实体。
Neurology. 2015 Dec 8;85(23):2006-10. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000002184. Epub 2015 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
A study on the therapeutic effect of zero-ray cardiac autonomic ganglion ablation on vasovagal syncope in a special occupational young population.零射线心脏自主神经节消融术对特殊职业青年人群血管迷走性晕厥治疗效果的研究
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Apr 3;12:1537827. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1537827. eCollection 2025.
2
The Efficacy of Cardioneuroablation versus Midodrine in Patients with Vasovagal Syncope: Design and Rationale for the CAMPAIGN Trial.心脏神经消融术与米多君治疗血管迷走性晕厥患者的疗效比较:CAMPAIGN试验的设计与原理
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2025 Mar;68(2):257-265. doi: 10.1007/s10840-025-02029-4. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
3
Vasovagal Syncope: A Review of Current and Emerging Therapies for a Common Cardiology Condition.
血管迷走性晕厥:常见心脏病状况的当前及新兴治疗方法综述
J Tehran Heart Cent. 2024 Jan;19(1):1-5. doi: 10.18502/jthc.v19i1.15529.
4
Effectiveness analysis of deceleration capacity and traditional heart rate variability in diagnosing vasovagal syncope.减速能力与传统心率变异性在诊断血管迷走性晕厥中的有效性分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Sep 3;11:1333684. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1333684. eCollection 2024.
5
A More Targeted and Selective Use of Implantable Loop Recorders Improves the Effectiveness of Syncope Units: A Single-Center Experience.更有针对性和选择性地使用植入式循环记录仪可提高晕厥单元的有效性:单中心经验。
Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 12;14(7):871. doi: 10.3390/life14070871.
6
Serotonin and vasovagal syncope.血清素与血管迷走性晕厥。
Clin Auton Res. 2024 Aug;34(4):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s10286-024-01052-1. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
7
Effectiveness of cardioneuroablation in different subtypes of vasovagal syncope.心脏神经消融术在不同亚型血管迷走性晕厥中的有效性。
J Geriatr Cardiol. 2024 Jun 28;21(6):651-657. doi: 10.26599/1671-5411.2024.06.004.
8
Cardioneuroablation for vasovagal syncope: insights on patients' selection, centre settings, procedural workflow and endpoints-results from an European Heart Rhythm Association survey.心脏神经消融治疗血管迷走性晕厥:患者选择、中心设置、程序流程和终点的见解——来自欧洲心律协会调查的结果。
Europace. 2024 May 2;26(5). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae106.
9
Making certain that noninvasive therapy for vasovagal syncope has failed before proceeding to invasive interventions.在进行侵入性干预之前,要确保针对血管迷走性晕厥的非侵入性治疗已经失败。
Europace. 2024 Mar 30;26(4). doi: 10.1093/europace/euae081.
10
Age and mean platelet volume-based nomogram for predicting the therapeutic efficacy of metoprolol in Chinese pediatric patients with vasovagal syncope.基于年龄和平均血小板体积的列线图预测美托洛尔治疗中国儿童血管迷走性晕厥的疗效。
World J Pediatr. 2024 Sep;20(9):957-965. doi: 10.1007/s12519-024-00802-5. Epub 2024 Apr 13.