Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Germany.
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Germany.
Rofo. 2021 Oct;193(10):1189-1196. doi: 10.1055/a-1388-8147. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
To evaluate imaging patterns of a COVID-19 infection of the lungs on chest radiographs and their value in discriminating this infection from other viral pneumonias.
All 321 patients who presented with respiratory impairment suspicious for COVID-19 infection between February 3 and May 8, 2020 and who received a chest radiograph were included in this analysis. Imaging findings were classified as typical for COVID-19 (bilateral, peripheral opacifications/consolidations), non-typical (findings consistent with lobar pneumonia), indeterminate (all other distribution patterns of opacifications/consolidations), or none (no opacifications/consolidations). The sensitivity, specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive value for the diagnostic value of the category "typical" were determined. Chi² test was used to compare the pattern distribution between the different types of pneumonia.
Imaging patterns defined as typical for COVID-19 infections were documented in 35/111 (31.5 %) patients with confirmed COVID-19 infection but only in 4/210 (2 %) patients with any other kind of pneumonia, resulting in a sensitivity of 31.5 %, a specificity of 98.1 %, and a positive and negative predictive value of 89.7 % or 73 %, respectively. The sensitivity could be increased to 45.9 % when defining also unilateral, peripheral opacifications/consolidations with no relevant pathology contralaterally as consistent with a COVID-19 infection, while the specificity decreases slightly to 93.3 %. The pattern distribution between COVID-19 patients and those with other types of pneumonia differed significantly (p < 0.0001).
Although the moderate sensitivity does not allow the meaningful use of chest radiographs as part of primary screening, the specific pattern of findings in a relevant proportion of those affected should be communicated quickly as additional information and trigger appropriate protective measures.
· COVID-19 infections show specific X-ray image patterns in 1/3 of patients.. · Bilateral, peripheral opacities and/or consolidations are typical imaging patterns.. · Unilateral, peripheral opacities and/or consolidations should also raise suspicion of COVID-19 infection..
· Kasper J, Decker J, Wiesenreiter K et al. Typical Imaging Patterns in COVID-19 Infections of the Lung on Plain Chest Radiographs to Aid Early Triage. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2021; 193: 1189 - 1196.
评估 COVID-19 肺部感染的胸部 X 线表现及其在鉴别这种感染与其他病毒性肺炎方面的价值。
本研究纳入了 2020 年 2 月 3 日至 5 月 8 日期间因疑似 COVID-19 感染而出现呼吸功能障碍并接受胸部 X 线检查的 321 例患者。将影像学表现分为 COVID-19 典型(双侧、外周混浊/实变)、非典型(与大叶性肺炎一致的表现)、不确定(混浊/实变的所有其他分布模式)或无(无混浊/实变)。确定了“典型”类别对诊断价值的敏感性、特异性以及阳性和阴性预测值。使用卡方检验比较不同类型肺炎的模式分布。
在 111 例确诊 COVID-19 感染的患者中,有 35 例(31.5%)影像学表现定义为 COVID-19 感染的典型表现,但在 210 例其他类型肺炎患者中仅 4 例(2%),其敏感性为 31.5%,特异性为 98.1%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 89.7%或 73%。当将单侧、无相关病理学的外周混浊/实变也定义为 COVID-19 感染时,敏感性可增加至 45.9%,但特异性略有下降至 93.3%。COVID-19 患者与其他类型肺炎患者的模式分布差异有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。
尽管中等敏感性不允许将胸部 X 射线作为初步筛查的一部分有意义地使用,但应快速传达受影响者中相当一部分患者的特定影像学发现,作为额外信息,并触发适当的保护措施。
· COVID-19 感染在 1/3 的患者中显示出特定的 X 射线图像模式。
· 双侧、外周混浊和/或实变是典型的影像学表现。
· 单侧、外周混浊和/或实变也应提示 COVID-19 感染的可能。