Milner R H, Hudson S J, Reid C A
St Lawrence Hospital, Chepstow, UK.
Burns Incl Therm Inj. 1988 Feb;14(1):62-5. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(98)90047-x.
Twenty-four patients were studied after the application of plasticized polyvinyl chloride (PVC) film as a temporary burns dressing. The burns were assessed as being partial thickness (nine patients) and full thickness (15 patients) in depth and involving 2 per cent to 35 per cent of the body surface area. Microbiological cultures were performed on the exudate beneath the plasticized PVC film and then at each dressing change until the burn was healed. Bacterial isolates showed no unexpected organisms and there was no predominant organism to suggest contamination from the plasticized PVC film. Indeed, bacteria were only rarely isolated from the initial exudate (three of 37 burn wounds), and subsequent bacterial cultures did not differ from those normally found in burn wounds. In addition, incorporation of the plasticized PVC film into nutrient broth and agar with Staph, aureus and Ps. aeruginosa did not influence the recovery of these organisms, indicating that plasticized PVC film does not exert any antibacterial effect.
对24例使用增塑聚氯乙烯(PVC)薄膜作为临时烧伤敷料的患者进行了研究。烧伤深度评估为浅度(9例患者)和深度(15例患者),累及体表面积的2%至35%。在增塑PVC薄膜下方的渗出物上进行微生物培养,然后在每次换药时进行培养,直至烧伤愈合。细菌分离株未显示出意外的微生物,也没有优势微生物表明来自增塑PVC薄膜的污染。事实上,仅在最初的渗出物中很少分离出细菌(37个烧伤创面中的3个),随后的细菌培养与烧伤创面中通常发现的情况没有差异。此外,将增塑PVC薄膜加入含有金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌的营养肉汤和琼脂中,并不影响这些微生物的复苏,这表明增塑PVC薄膜没有任何抗菌作用。