• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

治疗类风湿关节炎的生物类似药的系统评价和荟萃分析,为 2020 年日本风湿病学会类风湿关节炎管理临床实践指南更新提供信息。

Systematic review and meta-analysis of biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis informing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, Tokyo Women's Medical University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Inflammation and Immunology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Jan 5;32(1):74-86. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2021.1899591.

DOI:10.1080/14397595.2021.1899591
PMID:33706664
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of biosimilars compared with reference biological disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as a part of the process of developing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology guidelines for the management of RA.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Japan Centra Revuo Medicina were searched for articles to conduct a systematic review (SR). The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized controlled trials were included (biosimilars of infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab). A meta-analysis revealed that the risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of achieving the American College of Rheumatology 50% response (ACR50) at week 24 and serious adverse events (SAEs) for biosimilars compared with the reference bDMARDs were 1.04 (0.98-1.10) and 0.84 (0.61-1.18), respectively. The RRs of achieving ACR50 and SAEs at week 24 were respectively 0.93 (0.69-1.26) and 2.15 (0.55-8.35) in the patients who switched to biosimilars from the reference bDMARDs and 0.92 (0.76-1.12) and 1.41 (0.32-6.15) in those who continued the reference bDMARDs.

CONCLUSION

Biosimilars and reference bDMARDs were equally useful for the management of RA.

摘要

目的

评估生物类似药相对于类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的参照生物改善病情抗风湿药(bDMARDs)的疗效和安全性,这是制定 2020 年日本风湿病学会 RA 管理指南更新的一部分。

方法

检索 PubMed、Cochrane Library 和日本 Central Revuo Medicina,以进行系统评价(SR)。使用推荐评估、制定与评价系统(Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system)评估证据质量。

结果

纳入了 20 项随机对照试验(英夫利昔单抗、依那西普和阿达木单抗的生物类似药)。荟萃分析显示,生物类似药与参照 bDMARD 相比,在第 24 周达到美国风湿病学会 50%缓解(ACR50)和严重不良事件(SAEs)的风险比(RR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)分别为 1.04(0.98-1.10)和 0.84(0.61-1.18)。在从参照 bDMARD 转换为生物类似药的患者中,第 24 周达到 ACR50 和 SAE 的 RR 分别为 0.93(0.69-1.26)和 2.15(0.55-8.35),而在继续使用参照 bDMARD 的患者中,RR 分别为 0.92(0.76-1.12)和 1.41(0.32-6.15)。

结论

生物类似药和参照 bDMARDs 对 RA 的治疗同样有效。

相似文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of biosimilar for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis informing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.治疗类风湿关节炎的生物类似药的系统评价和荟萃分析,为 2020 年日本风湿病学会类风湿关节炎管理临床实践指南更新提供信息。
Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Jan 5;32(1):74-86. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2021.1899591.
2
Therapeutic Equivalence of Biosimilar and Reference Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.治疗类风湿关节炎的生物类似药与参照生物药的等效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15872.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors and their biosimilars in patients with rheumatoid arthritis having an insufficient response to methotrexate : A network meta-analysis.肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂及其生物类似药在对甲氨蝶呤反应不足的类风湿关节炎患者中的疗效和安全性比较:一项网状Meta分析。
Z Rheumatol. 2023 Apr;82(3):248-255. doi: 10.1007/s00393-021-01041-z. Epub 2021 Jul 5.
4
Equivalence and switching between biosimilars and reference molecules in rheumatoid arthritis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.类风湿关节炎中生物类似药与参照药物之间的等效性及转换:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 17;10(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01754-x.
5
Systematic review for the treatment of older rheumatoid arthritis patients informing the 2020 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.系统评价老年类风湿关节炎患者的治疗方法,为 2020 年日本风湿病学会类风湿关节炎管理临床实践指南更新提供信息。
Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Feb 28;32(2):313-322. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2021.1912922.
6
Efficacy of pharmacological treatment in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature research informing the 2019 update of the EULAR recommendations for management of rheumatoid arthritis.药物治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效:系统文献研究为 2019 年更新的 EULAR 类风湿关节炎管理建议提供信息。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2020 Jun;79(6):744-759. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2019-216656. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
7
Efficacy and safety of infliximab-biosimilar compared to other biological drugs in rheumatoid arthritis: a mixed treatment comparison.英夫利昔单抗生物类似药与其他生物药物治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效和安全性:一项混合治疗比较。
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 May;15 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S53-64. doi: 10.1007/s10198-014-0594-4. Epub 2014 May 16.
8
Systematic review and meta-analysis for the 2024 update of the Japan College of Rheumatology clinical practice guidelines for the management of rheumatoid arthritis.系统性评价和荟萃分析,为日本风湿病学会类风湿关节炎管理临床实践指南 2024 年更新版
Mod Rheumatol. 2024 Oct 15;34(6):1079-1094. doi: 10.1093/mr/roae049.
9
Adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, certolizumab pegol, golimumab, tocilizumab and abatacept for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis not previously treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and after the failure of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs only: systematic review and economic evaluation.阿达木单抗、依那西普、英夫利昔单抗、聚乙二醇化赛妥珠单抗、戈利木单抗、托珠单抗和阿巴西普用于治疗既往未使用改善病情抗风湿药物治疗且仅在传统改善病情抗风湿药物治疗失败后的类风湿关节炎:系统评价和经济学评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Apr;20(35):1-610. doi: 10.3310/hta20350.
10
Biologic or tofacitinib monotherapy for rheumatoid arthritis in people with traditional disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) failure: a Cochrane Systematic Review and network meta-analysis (NMA).生物制剂或托法替布单药治疗传统抗风湿药物(DMARD)治疗失败的类风湿关节炎患者:一项Cochrane系统评价和网状Meta分析(NMA)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Nov 17;11(11):CD012437. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012437.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative effectiveness and safety of biosimilars versus reference biologics in rheumatoid arthritis during treatment initiation: a systematic review of real-world evidence.生物类似药与参照生物制品在类风湿关节炎治疗起始阶段的比较有效性和安全性:真实世界证据的系统评价
Int J Clin Pharm. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1007/s11096-025-01956-6.
2
Consensus-Based Overarching Principles and Recommendations on the Use of Biosimilars in the Treatment of Inflammatory Arthritis in the Gulf Region.《海湾地区炎症性关节炎生物类似药治疗应用的共识性总体原则和推荐意见》。
BioDrugs. 2024 May;38(3):449-463. doi: 10.1007/s40259-023-00642-1. Epub 2024 Feb 25.
3
Impact of switching between reference biologics and biosimilars of tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
类风湿关节炎中肿瘤坏死因子抑制剂的参照生物制剂和生物类似药之间转换的影响:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 22;13(1):13699. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-40222-5.
4
Therapeutic Equivalence of Biosimilar and Reference Biologic Drugs in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.治疗类风湿关节炎的生物类似药与参照生物药的等效性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 May 1;6(5):e2315872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.15872.
5
Equivalence and switching between biosimilars and reference molecules in rheumatoid arthritis: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.类风湿关节炎中生物类似药与参照药物之间的等效性及转换:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2021 Jul 17;10(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01754-x.