Department of Orthopedics, NYU Langone Orthopedic Hospital, New York, NY.
Department of Orthopedics, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2021 Nov 1;46(21):1437-1447. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000004033.
Retrospective cohort study of a prospective cervical deformity (CD) database.
Identify factors associated with distal junctional kyphosis (DJK); assess differences across DJK types.
DJK may develop as compensation for mal-correction of sagittal deformity in the thoracic curve. There is limited understanding of DJK drivers, especially for different DJK types.
Included: patients with pre- and postoperative clinical/radiographic data. Excluded: patients with previous fusion to L5 or below. DJK was defined per surgeon note or DJK angle (kyphosis from LIV to LIV-2)<-10°, and pre- to postoperative change in DJK angle by<-10°. Age-specific target LL-TK alignment was calculated as published. Offset from target LL-TK was correlated to DJK magnitude and inclination. DJK types: severe (DJK<-20°), progressive (DJK increase>4.4°), symptomatic (reoperation or published disability thresholds of NDI ≥ 24 or mJOA≤14). Random forest identified factors associated with DJK. Means comparison tests assessed differences.
Included: 136 CD patients (61 ± 10 yr, 61%F). DJK rate was 30%. Postop offset from ideal LL-TK correlated with greater DJK angle (r = 0.428) and inclination of the distal end of the fusion construct (r = 0.244, both P < 0.02). Seven of the top 15 factors associated with DJK were radiographic, four surgical, and four clinical. Breakdown by type: severe (22%), progressive (24%), symptomatic (61%). Symptomatic had more posterior osteotomies than asymptomatic (P = 0.018). Severe had worse NDI and upper-cervical deformity (CL, C2 slope, C0-C2), as well as more posterior osteotomies than nonsevere (all P < 0.01). Progressive had greater malalignment both globally and in the cervical spine (all P < 0.03) than static. Each type had varying associated factors.
Offset from age-specific alignment is associated with greater DJK and more anterior distal construct inclination, suggesting DJK may develop due to inappropriate realignment. Preoperative clinical and radiographic factors are associated with symptomatic and progressive DJK, suggesting the need for preoperative risk stratification.Level of Evidence: 3.
前瞻性颈椎畸形(CD)数据库的回顾性队列研究。
确定与远端交界性后凸(DJK)相关的因素;评估不同 DJK 类型之间的差异。
DJK 可能是由于胸椎曲度矢状面矫正不足而导致的代偿性改变。对于 DJK 的驱动因素,尤其是不同 DJK 类型的驱动因素,人们的理解还很有限。
纳入:具有术前和术后临床/影像学数据的患者。排除:既往融合至 L5 或以下的患者。根据外科医生的记录或 DJK 角度(LIV 至 LIV-2 的后凸)< -10°定义 DJK,术后 DJK 角度的变化< -10°。根据已发表的内容计算特定年龄的目标 LL-TK 对齐。DJK 幅度和倾斜度与从目标 LL-TK 的偏移量相关。DJK 类型:严重(DJK < -20°),进展性(DJK 增加> 4.4°),症状性(再次手术或发表的 NDI≥24 或 mJOA≤14 残疾阈值)。随机森林确定与 DJK 相关的因素。均值比较检验评估差异。
纳入 136 例 CD 患者(61±10 岁,61%为女性)。DJK 发生率为 30%。术后与理想 LL-TK 的偏移量与更大的 DJK 角度(r = 0.428)和融合结构远端的倾斜度(r = 0.244,均 P < 0.02)相关。与 DJK 相关的前 15 个因素中有 7 个是影像学因素,4 个是手术因素,4 个是临床因素。按类型细分:严重(22%),进展性(24%),症状性(61%)。症状性患者比无症状患者有更多的后路截骨术(P = 0.018)。严重组的 NDI 和上颈椎畸形(CL、C2 斜率、C0-C2)更差,后路截骨术也比非严重组多(均 P < 0.01)。进展组在整体和颈椎方面的对线不良更严重(均 P < 0.03),而静态组则更严重。每种类型都有不同的相关因素。
与特定年龄的对齐偏移量相关的是更大的 DJK 和更靠前的远端结构倾斜度,这表明 DJK 可能是由于不适当的重新对线而发展起来的。术前临床和影像学因素与症状性和进展性 DJK 相关,表明需要进行术前风险分层。
3 级。