Sarkar Saptarshi, Bandyopadhyay Biman
Department of Chemistry, Malaviya National Institute of Technology Jaipur, Jaipur, 302017, India.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2021 Mar 21;23(11):6651-6664. doi: 10.1039/d0cp05553k. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
Reaction of ammonia with NO, without and with the assistance of water, in the troposphere has been investigated by electronic structure and chemical kinetic calculations. The whole process has been compared against the hydrolysis reaction, uncatalyzed as well as water and ammonia catalyzed. A comparative study between hydrolysis and ammonolysis based on relative rates has been extensively carried out. The analysis reveals that ammonolysis has negligible practical atmospheric implication compared to hydrolysis. The former could have a significant contribution in tropospheric HNO formation only at 0 km altitude under two conditions: either on a local scale, where ammonia concentration could reach around a thousand times its global average value, or under very low humidity and at a lower temperature. Relative rate studies also suggest that the catalytic effect of both ammonia and water is negligibly small in determining the atmospheric fate of NOvia gas phase hydrolysis and ammonolysis.
通过电子结构和化学动力学计算,研究了对流层中氨与一氧化氮在有无水辅助的情况下的反应。将整个过程与水解反应进行了比较,包括无催化、水催化和氨催化的水解反应。基于相对速率,对水解和氨解进行了广泛的比较研究。分析表明,与水解相比,氨解对实际大气的影响可忽略不计。只有在两种条件下,氨解才可能在对流层HNO形成中发挥显著作用:一是在局部尺度上,氨浓度可能达到其全球平均值的约一千倍;二是在非常低的湿度和较低温度下,且高度为0公里。相对速率研究还表明,在通过气相水解和氨解确定NO的大气归宿方面,氨和水的催化作用都非常小,可以忽略不计。