Suppr超能文献

基于混合藻类的生物脱盐-低压反渗透系统的生命周期成本分析

Life-cycle cost analysis of a hybrid algae-based biological desalination - low pressure reverse osmosis system.

作者信息

Gao Li, Liu Gang, Zamyadi Arash, Wang Qilin, Li Ming

机构信息

Institute for Sustainable Industries and Liveable Cities, Victoria University, PO Box 14428, Melbourne, Victoria 8001, Australia.

College of Management and Economics, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.

出版信息

Water Res. 2021 May 1;195:116957. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2021.116957. Epub 2021 Feb 23.

Abstract

To fully understand the economic viability and implementation strategy of the emerging algae-based desalination technology, this study investigates the economic aspects of algae-based desalination system by comparing the life-cycle costs of three different scenarios: (1) a multi-stage microalgae based desalination system; (2) a hybrid desalination system based on the combination of microalgae and low pressure reverse osmosis (LPRO) system; and (3) a seawater reverse osmosis (SWRO) desalination system. It is identified that the capital expenditure (CAPEX) and operational expenditure (OPEX) of scenario 1 are significantly higher than those of scenarios 2 and 3, when algal biomass reuse is not taken into consideration. If the revenues obtained from the algal biomass reuse are taken into account, the OPEX of scenario 1 will decrease significantly, and scenarios 2 and 3 will have the highest and lowest OPEX, respectively. However, due to the high CAPEX of scenario 1, the total expenditure (TOTEX) of scenario 1 is still 27% and 33% higher than those of scenarios 2 and 3, respectively. A sensitivity study is undertaken to understand the effects of six key parameters on water total cost for different scenarios. It is suggested that the electricity unit price plays the most important role in determining the water total cost for different scenarios. An uncertainty analysis is also conducted to investigate the effects and limitations of the key assumptions made in this study. It is suggested that the assumption of total dissolved solids (TDS) removal efficiency of microalgae results in a high uncertainty of life-cycle cost analysis (LCCA). Additionally, it is estimated that 1.58 megaton and 0.30 megaton CO can be captured by the algae-based desalination process for scenarios 1 and 2, respectively, over 20 years service period, which could result in approximately AU $18 million and AU $3 million indirect financial benefits for scenarios 1 and 2, respectively. When algal biomass reuse, CO bio-fixation and land availability are all taken into account, scenario 2 with hybrid desalination system is considered as the most economical and environmentally friendly option.

摘要

为全面了解新兴的基于藻类的海水淡化技术的经济可行性和实施策略,本研究通过比较三种不同方案的生命周期成本,对基于藻类的海水淡化系统的经济方面进行了调查:(1)多级微藻海水淡化系统;(2)基于微藻与低压反渗透(LPRO)系统组合的混合海水淡化系统;(3)海水反渗透(SWRO)海水淡化系统。研究发现,在不考虑藻类生物质再利用的情况下,方案1的资本支出(CAPEX)和运营支出(OPEX)显著高于方案2和方案3。如果考虑从藻类生物质再利用中获得的收入,方案1的OPEX将显著降低,方案2和方案3的OPEX将分别最高和最低。然而,由于方案1的CAPEX较高,方案1的总支出(TOTEX)仍分别比方案2和方案3高27%和33%。进行了敏感性研究,以了解六个关键参数对不同方案水总成本的影响。结果表明,电价在确定不同方案的水总成本方面起着最重要的作用。还进行了不确定性分析,以研究本研究中所作关键假设的影响和局限性。结果表明,微藻总溶解固体(TDS)去除效率的假设导致生命周期成本分析(LCCA)的高度不确定性。此外,据估计,在20年的服务期内,基于藻类的海水淡化工艺分别可为方案1和方案2捕获158万吨和30万吨二氧化碳,这可为方案1和方案2分别带来约1800万澳元和300万澳元的间接经济效益。当同时考虑藻类生物质再利用、二氧化碳生物固定和土地可用性时,采用混合海水淡化系统的方案2被认为是最经济和环境友好的选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验