Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Parc de Salut Mar, Hospital de l'Esperança, Sant Josep de la Muntanya, 12, 08024, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022 Mar;30(3):1057-1064. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06528-5. Epub 2021 Mar 14.
The aim of the study was to compare the distance of intrusion of the cement into the bone in different areas both in the femur and the tibia in vivo, measured in the radiograph after implanting a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with three different cement techniques.
A prospective randomized study of 90 consecutive patients operated on at our institution with a cemented U2 Knee System TKA and medium viscosity Simplex P bone cement. After pulse lavage, the cement was applied on the bone surfaces (group 1), on the implant surfaces (group 2) or both on the bone and the implant surfaces (group 3). The cement intrusion was measured in the postoperative radiographs in eight different regions in the tibial component and in six regions in the femoral component. The cement employed was calculated by weighting the cement after mixing and weighting the discarded cement.
The average intrusion of the cement was similar in all three groups of cementing techniques in the femoral components (1.6 mm; p = 0.386), and in the tibial components (2.6 mm; p = 0.144). The intrusion of the cement in the tibia was greater in women than in men (p = 0.04). We used 21.1 (SD 5.8) g of cement in average. The amount of cement employed was greater when the cement was applied on both (implant and bone) surfaces (group 3: 24.03 g in average) than when it was applied only on the bone (group 1: 20.13 g; p = 0.01) or only on the implants (group 2: 19.20 g; p = 0.001). The amount of cement employed was greater in men than in women (p = 0.002) and it was also greater when a PS femoral component was used (p = 0.03). The amount of cement employed was directly correlated with the height of the patients (p = 0.01) and with the bigger size of the components (p < 0.001).
All three cement application techniques have similar intrusion distance of the cement into the bone, and the intrusion depth of the cement into the trabecular tibial bone is greater than the minimum suggested for fixation.
本研究旨在比较三种不同骨水泥技术在植入全膝关节置换术后股骨和胫骨不同部位的骨水泥侵入距离,通过术后放射影像进行测量。
前瞻性随机研究纳入了在我院接受 U2 膝关节系统全膝关节置换术和中黏度 Simplex P 骨水泥的 90 例连续患者。脉冲冲洗后,将骨水泥应用于骨表面(组 1)、植入物表面(组 2)或同时应用于骨和植入物表面(组 3)。在术后放射影像上,在胫骨组件的八个不同区域和股骨组件的六个区域测量骨水泥侵入深度。通过混合后称重骨水泥和称重丢弃的骨水泥来计算所使用的骨水泥量。
在所有三种骨水泥技术组中,股骨组件的骨水泥平均侵入深度相似(1.6mm;p=0.386),胫骨组件也相似(2.6mm;p=0.144)。女性的胫骨骨水泥侵入深度大于男性(p=0.04)。我们平均使用了 21.1(SD 5.8)g 的骨水泥。当骨水泥同时应用于骨(组 3:平均 24.03g)和植入物(组 1:20.13g;p=0.01)或仅应用于骨(组 2:19.20g;p=0.001)时,使用的骨水泥量较大。男性使用的骨水泥量大于女性(p=0.002),当使用 PS 股骨组件时,使用的骨水泥量也更大(p=0.03)。使用的骨水泥量与患者的身高直接相关(p=0.01),也与组件的较大尺寸相关(p<0.001)。
三种骨水泥应用技术的骨水泥侵入骨的距离相似,且骨水泥侵入胫骨松质骨的深度大于固定所需的最小深度。