Inha University College of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon, South Korea.
Inha University College of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Incheon, South Korea.
Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2022 Nov-Dec;88 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S14-S17. doi: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2021.02.004. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
The diagnosis of vestibular neuritis is based on clinical and laboratory findings after exclusion of other disease. There are occasional discrepancies between clinical impressions and laboratory results. It could be the first vertigo episode caused by other recurrent vestibular disease, other than vestibular neuritis.
This study aimed to analyze the clinical features and identify the diagnostic evolution of patients with clinically suspected vestibular neuritis.
A total of 201 patients clinically diagnosed with vestibular neuritis were included in this study. Clinical data on the symptoms and signs of vertigo along with the results of vestibular function test were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were categorized in terms of the results of caloric testing (CP - canal paresis) group; canal paresis ≥25%; (MCP -minimal canal paresis) group; canal paresis <25%). Clinical features were compared between the two groups and the final diagnosis was reviewed after long-term follow up of both groups.
Out of 201 patients, 57 showed minimal canal paresis (CP<25%) and 144 showed definite canal paresis (CP≥25%). A total of 48 patients (23.8%) experienced another vertigo episode and were re-diagnosed. Recurring vestibular symptoms were seen more frequently in patients with minimal canal paresis (p=0.027). Repeated symptoms were observed on the same affected side more frequently in the CP group. The proportion of final diagnosis were not different between two groups.
Patients with minimal CP are more likely to have recurrent vertigo than patients with definite CP. There was no significant difference in the distribution of the final diagnoses between two groups when the vertigo recurs.
前庭神经炎的诊断基于临床和实验室检查排除其他疾病后得出。临床印象和实验室结果偶尔会存在差异。它可能是由其他复发性前庭疾病引起的首次眩晕发作,而不是前庭神经炎。
本研究旨在分析临床上疑似前庭神经炎患者的临床特征并确定其诊断演变。
共纳入 201 例临床诊断为前庭神经炎的患者。回顾性分析眩晕症状和体征的临床数据以及前庭功能检查结果。根据冷热试验(CP-管麻痹)的结果将患者分为两组:CP 组,管麻痹≥25%;MCP 组,管麻痹<25%。比较两组的临床特征,并对两组患者进行长期随访后回顾最终诊断。
201 例患者中,57 例表现为轻微管麻痹(CP<25%),144 例表现为明确管麻痹(CP≥25%)。共有 48 例(23.8%)患者出现另一次眩晕发作并重新诊断。MCP 组患者出现复发性前庭症状的频率更高(p=0.027)。CP 组中,在同一受累侧出现重复症状的频率更高。两组的最终诊断比例无差异。
CP 轻微的患者比 CP 明确的患者更有可能出现复发性眩晕。当眩晕再次发作时,两组的最终诊断分布没有显著差异。