Suppr超能文献

应用运动机能学在评估营养状况方面不可靠。

Applied kinesiology unreliable for assessing nutrient status.

作者信息

Kenney J J, Clemens R, Forsythe K D

机构信息

Pritikin Longevity Center, Santa Monica, California.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1988 Jun;88(6):698-704.

PMID:3372923
Abstract

Applied kinesiology is a technique used to assess nutritional status on the basis of the response of muscles to mechanical stress. In this study, 11 subjects were evaluated independently by three experienced applied kinesiologists for four nutrients (thiamin, zinc, vitamin A, and ascorbic acid). The results obtained by those applied kinesiologists were compared with (a) one another, (b) standard laboratory tests for nutrient status, and (c) computerized isometric muscle testing. Statistical analysis yielded no significant interjudge reliability, no significant correlation between the testers and standard biochemical tests for nutrient status, and no significant correlation between mechanical and manual determinations of relative muscle strength. In addition, the subjects were exposed in a double-blind fashion to supplements of thiamin, zinc, vitamin A, and ascorbic acid and two placebos (pectin and sucrose) and then re-tested. According to applied kinesiology theory, "weak" (indicating deficiency) muscles are strengthened when the subject is exposed to an appropriate nutritional supplement. Statistical analysis revealed no significant differences in the response to placebo, nutrients previously determined (by muscle testing) to be deficient, and nutrients previously determined (by muscle testing) to be adequate. Even though the number of subjects (11) and nutrients (4) tested was limited, the results of this study indicated that the use of applied kinesiology to evaluate nutrient status is no more useful than random guessing.

摘要

应用运动机能学是一种根据肌肉对机械应力的反应来评估营养状况的技术。在本研究中,11名受试者由三名经验丰富的应用运动机能学家针对四种营养素(硫胺素、锌、维生素A和抗坏血酸)进行独立评估。这些应用运动机能学家所获得的结果与以下方面进行了比较:(a) 彼此之间的结果;(b) 营养状况的标准实验室检测;以及 (c) 计算机化等长肌肉测试。统计分析表明,评判者之间不存在显著的可靠性,测试者与营养状况的标准生化检测之间不存在显著相关性,并且相对肌肉力量的机械测定与手动测定之间也不存在显著相关性。此外,受试者以双盲方式接受硫胺素、锌、维生素A、抗坏血酸补充剂以及两种安慰剂(果胶和蔗糖),然后再次进行测试。根据应用运动机能学理论,当受试者摄入适当的营养补充剂时,“虚弱”(表明缺乏)的肌肉会得到增强。统计分析显示,对安慰剂、先前(通过肌肉测试)确定为缺乏的营养素以及先前(通过肌肉测试)确定为充足的营养素的反应没有显著差异。尽管所测试的受试者数量(11名)和营养素数量(4种)有限,但本研究结果表明,使用应用运动机能学来评估营养状况并不比随机猜测更有用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验