Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Louisiana State University Medical School, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Aesthet Surg J. 2021 Jul 14;41(8):NP1105-NP1114. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjab137.
Opioids are a mainstay of pain management. To limit the use of opioids, enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols implement multimodal approaches to treat postoperative pain.
The aim of this paper was to be the first to assess the efficacy of an ERAS protocol for plastic surgery outpatients that includes ultrasound-guided, surgeon-led regional blocks.
A retrospective review of patients undergoing outpatient plastic surgery on an ERAS protocol was performed. These patients were compared to a well-matched group not on an ERAS protocol (pre-ERAS). Endpoints included the amounts of opioid, antinausea, and antispasmodic medication prescribed. ERAS patients were given a postoperative questionnaire to assess both pain levels (0-10) and opioid consumption. ERAS patients anticipated to have higher levels of pain received ultrasound-guided anesthetic blocks.
There were 157 patients in the pre-ERAS group and 202 patients in the ERAS group. Patients in the pre-ERAS group were prescribed more opioid (332.3 vs 100.3 morphine milligram equivalents (MME)/patient; P < 0.001), antinausea (664 vs 16.3 mg of promethazine/patient; P < 0.001), and antispasmodic (401.3 vs 31.2 mg of cyclobenzaprine/patient; P < 0.001) medication. Patients on the ERAS protocol consumed an average total of 22.7 MME/patient postoperatively. Average pain scores in this group peaked at 5.32 on postoperative day 1 and then decreased significantly daily.
Implementation of an ERAS protocol for plastic surgery outpatients with utilization of ultrasound-guided regional anesthetic blocks is feasible and efficacious. The ability to significantly decrease prescribed opioids in this unique patient population is noteworthy.
阿片类药物是疼痛管理的主要手段。为了限制阿片类药物的使用,术后快速康复(ERAS)方案采用多模式方法来治疗术后疼痛。
本文旨在评估包含超声引导、外科医生主导的区域阻滞的 ERAS 方案在门诊整形外科患者中的疗效,这在该领域尚属首次。
对接受 ERAS 方案的门诊整形外科患者进行回顾性研究。将这些患者与未接受 ERAS 方案的匹配良好的对照组(ERAS 前)进行比较。主要终点包括处方阿片类药物、止吐药和抗痉挛药的剂量。ERAS 患者术后接受问卷调查,以评估疼痛程度(0-10 分)和阿片类药物的使用情况。预计疼痛程度较高的 ERAS 患者接受超声引导麻醉阻滞。
ERAS 前组有 157 例患者,ERAS 组有 202 例患者。ERAS 前组患者处方的阿片类药物(332.3 与 100.3 吗啡毫克当量(MME)/患者;P < 0.001)、止吐药(664 与 16.3 毫克丙嗪/患者;P < 0.001)和抗痉挛药(401.3 与 31.2 毫克环苯扎林/患者;P < 0.001)更多。ERAS 方案组患者术后平均总消耗 22.7 MME/例。该组患者的平均疼痛评分在术后第 1 天达到 5.32 的峰值,然后每天显著下降。
在接受超声引导区域麻醉阻滞的整形外科门诊患者中实施 ERAS 方案是可行且有效的。在这个独特的患者群体中,能够显著减少处方阿片类药物的用量是值得注意的。