Liu X B, Gao Z Y, Jin S, Gao B, Wang M S, Wu T, Li S B, Tong Q, Zhang J C
Department of Gastroenterology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China Hubei Key Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China.
Department of Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan 442000, China.
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021 Mar 6;55(3):371-378. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112150-20200707-00984.
To explore the flora characteristics and differences of esophageal tissues between elderly esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients and young and middle-aged ESCC patients, so as to assist in studying the potential biomarkers of elderly ESCC patients. In this study, a retrospective study was adopted. 72 ESCC patients diagnosed in Taihe Hospital, Shiyan City, Hubei Province from July 2018 to July 2019 were selected, including 49 patients in the elderly group (≥ 60 years old, 40 males and 9 females), 23 patients in the young and middle-aged group (<60 years old, 21 males and 2 females). In the same period, 20 healthy persons without abnormal gastroscopy in endoscopy center were selected as the control group (aged 35-78 years old, median age 57 years old, 16 males and 4 females). The genomic DNA was extracted from the affected esophageal tissues of patients with ESCC and the middle esophageal samples of the control group. The V4 hypervariable region of bacterial 16SrRNA gene sequence was amplified. Illumina HiSeq sequencing technology was adopted. The flora characteristics of elderly, young and middle-aged ESCC patients was compared and analyzed. QIIME and Rstudio software were used to analyze the sequence data, and nonparametric Kruskal-Wallis test or Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for statistical methods. Shannon index [5.17 (4.53, 5.95) 4.79 (3.74, 5.97)], Simpson index [0.94 (0.91, 0.96) 0.92 (0.83, 0.96)] and Chao1 index [343.55 (259.76, 570.59) 329.16 (268.88, 648.00)] were similar in flora of two groups, and there was no significant difference (=-0.791, -1.057, -0.380, all >0.05). There was no significant difference in β-diversity between the elderly group and the young and middle-aged group (PC1=19.14%, PC2=6.95%, =0.67, =0.42). At the phyla level, the top 5 phyla in abundance were as follows: and in the young and middle-aged group, while the top 5 phyla in abundance were as follows: and in the elderly group; the significant difference between the two groups was (=0.596, 0.05). At the genus level, the top 5 genera in the young and middle-aged group in abundance were as follows: and In the elderly group, and were the top 5 in abundance, and there were significant difference in between the two groups (=0.938, 0.05). PICRUSt function prediction showed that the abundance of and in the elderly group were lower than those in the young and middle-aged group (all =0.734, 0.05). There is no significant difference in α-diversity and β-diversity between elderly ESCC patients and young and middle-aged patients, but the abundance of flora increased.
为探究老年食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者与中青年ESCC患者食管组织的菌群特征及差异,以辅助研究老年ESCC患者的潜在生物标志物。本研究采用回顾性研究方法。选取2018年7月至2019年7月在湖北省十堰市太和医院确诊的72例ESCC患者,其中老年组(≥60岁,40例男性,9例女性)49例,中青年组(<60岁,21例男性,2例女性)23例。同期,选取内镜中心20例胃镜检查无异常的健康人作为对照组(年龄35 - 78岁,中位年龄57岁,16例男性,4例女性)。提取ESCC患者病变食管组织及对照组食管中段样本的基因组DNA。扩增细菌16SrRNA基因序列的V4高变区。采用Illumina HiSeq测序技术。比较分析老年、中青年ESCC患者的菌群特征。使用QIIME和Rstudio软件分析序列数据,统计方法采用非参数Kruskal - Wallis检验或Wilcoxon秩和检验。两组菌群的香农指数[5.17(4.53, 5.95) 4.79(3.74, 5.97)]、辛普森指数[0.94(0.91, 0.96) 0.92(0.83, 0.96)]和Chao1指数[343.55(259.76, 570.59) 329.16(268.88, 648.00)]相似,差异无统计学意义(=-0.791, -1.057, -0.380,均>0.05)。老年组与中青年组之间的β多样性无显著差异(PC1 = 19.14%,PC2 = 6.95%,=0.67,=0.42)。在门水平上,丰度排名前5的门如下:中青年组为 和 ,而老年组为 和 ;两组间差异有统计学意义(=0.596,0.05)。在属水平上,中青年组丰度排名前5的属如下: 和 。老年组中, 和 丰度排名前5,两组间 差异有统计学意义(=0.938,0.05)。PICRUSt功能预测显示,老年组 和 的丰度低于中青年组(均=0.734,0.05)。老年ESCC患者与中青年患者之间的α多样性和β多样性无显著差异,但 菌群丰度增加。
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021-3-6
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021
Zhonghua Shao Shang Za Zhi. 2020-12-20
J Med Microbiol. 2018-6-20
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2023-7
Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2020-6-26
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2021-12-6