Faculty of Welfare and Health Sciences, University of Haifa, Abba Khoushy Ave 199, Haifa, Israel.
Faculty of Medicine, Technion- Israel Institute of Technology, Efron St.1, Haifa, Israel.
Injury. 2021 May;52(5):1227-1233. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2021.03.003. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
Although post-motor vehicle collision (MVC) pain and symptoms are largely convergent among those with mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) and whiplash associated disorder (WAD), and patients oftentimes report initial neck and head complaints, the clinical picture of mTBI and WAD has been primarily studied as separate conditions which may result in an incomplete clinical picture. As such, this study was conducted to explore the role of pain and post-traumatic psychological features in explaining both head and neck-related symptom variability in a cohort of post-collision patients. This is with the goal of disentangling if contributory factors are uniquely related to each diagnosis, or are shared between the two.
Patients recruited in the very early acute phase (<72 h) returned for clinical and psychological assessment at 6 months post-accident. In order to determine which factors were unique and which ones were overlapping the same potential contributors: mean head pain, mean neck pain, female gender, number of post-collision painful body areas, PTSD, and depression were included in the regression models for both neck disability index (NDI) and Rivermead post-concussion symptoms questionnaire (RPQ).
Of 223 recruited participants, 70 returned for a follow-up visit (age range 18-64, mean(SD) 37.6 (11.9), 29F). This cohort primarily met the criteria for mTBI, but also fulfilled the criteria for whiplash, reinforcing the duality of injury presentation. Correlations existed between the NDI and RPQ scores (Spearman's ρ=0.66, p<0.001), however overlap was only partial. Regression analysis showed that after the removal of area-of-injury pain neck related disability (r = 0.80, p <0.001) was explained solely by number of painful body areas (ß=0.52, p <0.001). In contrast, post-concussion syndrome symptoms (r = 0.86, p<0.001) are influenced by clinical pain, painful body areas (ß=0.31, p = 0.0026), female gender (ß=0.19, p = 0.0053), and psychological factors of depression (ß=0.31, p = 0.0028) and PTSD symptoms (ß=0.36, p = 0.0013).
It seems that while mechanisms of neck- and head-related symptoms in post-collision patients do share a common explanatory feature, of residual body pain, they are not entirely overlapping. In that psychological factors influence post-concussion syndrome symptoms, but not post-whiplash neck disability.
尽管与轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)和挥鞭样损伤相关障碍(WAD)相关的机动车碰撞后(MVC)疼痛和症状在很大程度上是一致的,且患者经常报告最初的颈部和头部投诉,但 mTBI 和 WAD 的临床特征主要作为单独的病症进行研究,这可能导致临床特征不完整。因此,本研究旨在探讨疼痛和创伤后心理特征在解释碰撞后患者队列中与头部和颈部相关的症状变异性中的作用。其目的是确定贡献因素是否仅与每种诊断相关,或者是否在两种诊断之间共享。
招募的患者在早期急性阶段(<72 小时)内返回,并在事故后 6 个月进行临床和心理评估。为了确定哪些因素是独特的,哪些因素是重叠的,相同的潜在因素:平均头部疼痛、平均颈部疼痛、女性性别、碰撞后疼痛身体区域的数量、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)和抑郁被纳入颈部残疾指数(NDI)和 Rivermead 脑震荡后症状问卷(RPQ)的回归模型。
在 223 名招募的参与者中,有 70 名返回进行随访(年龄范围 18-64 岁,平均(SD)37.6(11.9),29 名女性)。该队列主要符合 mTBI 的标准,但也符合挥鞭样损伤的标准,这强化了损伤表现的双重性。NDI 和 RPQ 评分之间存在相关性(Spearman's ρ=0.66,p<0.001),但重叠只是部分的。回归分析表明,在去除损伤区域疼痛后,颈部相关残疾(r=0.80,p<0.001)仅由疼痛身体区域的数量(ß=0.52,p<0.001)解释。相比之下,脑震荡后综合征症状(r=0.86,p<0.001)受临床疼痛、疼痛身体区域(ß=0.31,p=0.0026)、女性性别(ß=0.19,p=0.0053)和心理因素的影响抑郁(ß=0.31,p=0.0028)和 PTSD 症状(ß=0.36,p=0.0013)。
似乎尽管碰撞后患者的颈部和头部相关症状的机制确实有一个共同的解释特征,即残留的身体疼痛,但它们并不完全重叠。在心理因素影响脑震荡后综合征症状,但不影响挥鞭样损伤后颈部残疾的情况下。