Dias Liliana, Lopes Cátia R, Gonçalves Francisco Q, Nunes Ana, Pochmann Daniela, Machado Nuno J, Tomé Angelo R, Agostinho Paula, Cunha Rodrigo A
CNC-Center for Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Department of Life Sciences, Faculty of Sciences and Technology, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Front Cell Neurosci. 2021 Mar 1;15:639322. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2021.639322. eCollection 2021.
Depressive conditions precipitated by repeated stress are a major socio-economical burden in Western countries. Previous studies showed that ATP-P receptors (PR) and adenosine A receptors (AR) antagonists attenuate behavioral modifications upon exposure to repeated stress. Since it is unknown if these two purinergic modulation systems work independently, we now investigated a putative interplay between PR and AR. Adult rats exposed to restraint stress for 14 days displayed an anxious (thigmotaxis, elevated plus maze), depressive (anhedonia, increased immobility), and amnesic (modified Y maze, object displacement) profile, together with increased expression of Iba-1 (a marker of microglia "activation") and interleukin-1β (IL1β) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα; proinflammatory cytokines) and an up-regulation of PR (mRNA) and AR (receptor binding) in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex. All these features were attenuated by the PR-preferring antagonist brilliant blue G (BBG, 45 mg/kg, i.p.) or by caffeine (0.3 g/L, .), which affords neuroprotection through AR blockade. Notably, BBG attenuated AR upregulation and caffeine attenuated PR upregulation. In microglial N9 cells, the PR agonist BzATP (100 μM) or the AR agonist CGS26180 (100 nM) increased calcium levels, which was abrogated by the PR antagonist JNJ47965567 (1 μM) and by the AR antagonist SCH58261 (50 nM), respectively; notably JNJ47965567 prevented the effect of CGS21680 and the effect of BzATP was attenuated by SCH58261 and increased by CGS21680. These results provide the first demonstration of a functional interaction between PR and AR controlling microglia reactivity likely involved in behavioral adaptive responses to stress and are illustrative of a cooperation between the two arms of the purinergic system in the control of brain function.
反复应激引发的抑郁状况是西方国家的一项重大社会经济负担。先前的研究表明,ATP-P受体(PR)和腺苷A受体(AR)拮抗剂可减轻暴露于反复应激时的行为改变。由于尚不清楚这两种嘌呤能调节系统是否独立发挥作用,我们现在研究了PR和AR之间可能的相互作用。成年大鼠暴露于束缚应激14天,表现出焦虑(趋触性、高架十字迷宫)、抑郁(快感缺失、不动时间增加)和失忆(改良Y迷宫、物体移位)特征,同时海马体和前额叶皮质中Iba-1(小胶质细胞“激活”标志物)、白细胞介素-1β(IL1β)和肿瘤坏死因子α(TNFα;促炎细胞因子)的表达增加,以及PR(mRNA)和AR(受体结合)上调。所有这些特征都被PR选择性拮抗剂亮蓝G(BBG,45毫克/千克,腹腔注射)或咖啡因(0.3克/升,……)减弱,咖啡因通过AR阻断提供神经保护。值得注意的是,BBG减弱了AR上调,咖啡因减弱了PR上调。在小胶质细胞N9细胞中,PR激动剂BzATP(100微摩尔)或AR激动剂CGS26180(100纳摩尔)增加了钙水平,分别被PR拮抗剂JNJ47965567(1微摩尔)和AR拮抗剂SCH58261(50纳摩尔)消除;值得注意的是,JNJ47965567阻止了CGS21680的作用,BzATP的作用被SCH58261减弱,被CGS21680增强。这些结果首次证明了PR和AR之间的功能相互作用,这种相互作用控制着小胶质细胞反应性,可能参与对应激的行为适应性反应,并且说明了嘌呤能系统的两个分支在控制脑功能方面存在合作。