Suppr超能文献

彼得鲁斯·范·穆申布鲁克(1692-1761 年)与早期的莱顿瓶:被忽视的手稿探讨。

Petrus van Musschenbroek (1692-1761) and the early Leiden jar: A discussion of the neglected manuscripts.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Hist Sci. 2022 Mar;60(1):103-129. doi: 10.1177/00732753211000186. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Abstract

In this article, I discuss manuscript material written by Petrus van Musschenbroek (1692-1761) related to his first experiments with the Leiden jar. Despite the importance of the discovery of the Leiden jar for the history of electricity and the questions that still surround its discovery, a detailed treatment of this manuscript material is lacking in the literature. The main aim of this paper is to provide an outline of the manuscript material and to contextualize van Musschenbroek's first experiments with the Leiden jar. I show how the experiment fits within his research program on electricity and I discuss van Musschenbroek's initial reactions to and analysis of the phenomenon. Before doing so, I first provide a short overview of the treatment of the early history of the Leiden jar in the secondary literature. After that, I discuss van Musschenbroek's treatment of the topic of electricity in the textbooks he published in the years before the discovery of the device. Van Musschenbroek repeatedly emphasized that not enough experimental results were available for an informed theoretical treatment of the phenomenon of electricity to be possible. I then turn to the manuscript material, where I give a general description of the contents of the manuscript and van Musschenbroek's experimental practice. The manuscript material further confirms recent work on the Leiden jar by Silva and Heering, and provides new insights into the way van Musschenbroek himself reacted to the discovery.

摘要

在本文中,我讨论了彼得鲁斯·范·穆申布鲁克(Petrus van Musschenbroek,1692-1761 年)撰写的与他首次使用莱顿瓶进行实验有关的手稿材料。尽管莱顿瓶的发现对电学史以及围绕其发现的诸多问题具有重要意义,但文献中缺乏对这些手稿材料的详细处理。本文的主要目的是提供这些手稿材料的概述,并将范·穆申布鲁克首次使用莱顿瓶的实验置于适当的背景下。我展示了该实验如何融入他的电研究计划,并讨论了范·穆申布鲁克对该现象的初步反应和分析。在这样做之前,我首先简要概述了二手文献中对莱顿瓶早期历史的处理。之后,我讨论了范·穆申布鲁克在该装置发现之前出版的教科书中对电主题的处理。范·穆申布鲁克反复强调,由于实验结果不足,因此不可能对电现象进行明智的理论处理。然后,我转向手稿材料,在那里我对手稿的内容和范·穆申布鲁克的实验实践进行了一般性描述。这些手稿材料进一步证实了席尔瓦和希尔林最近对莱顿瓶的研究,并为了解范·穆申布鲁克本人对这一发现的反应提供了新的视角。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验