Suppr超能文献

学术期刊自助:20 世纪 50 年代的科学学会与出版业的商业往来。

Self-help for learned journals: Scientific societies and the commerce of publishing in the 1950s.

机构信息

University of St Andrews, UK.

出版信息

Hist Sci. 2022 Jun;60(2):255-279. doi: 10.1177/0073275321999901. Epub 2021 Mar 18.

Abstract

In the decades after the Second World War, learned society publishers struggled to cope with the expanding output of scientific research and the increased involvement of commercial publishers in the business of publishing research journals. Could learned society journals survive economically in the postwar world, against this competition? Or was the emergence of a sales-based commercial model of publishing - in contrast to the traditional model of subsidized journal publishing - an opportunity to transform the often-fragile finances of learned societies? But there was also an existential threat: if commercial firms could successfully publish scientific journals, were learned society publishers no longer needed? This paper investigates how British learned society publishers adjusted to the new economic realities of the postwar world, through an investigation of the activities organized by the Royal Society of London and the Nuffield Foundation, culminating in the 1963 report . It reveals the postwar decades as the time when scientific research became something to be commodified and sold to libraries, rather than circulated as part of a scholarly mission. It will be essential reading for all those campaigning to transition academic publishing - including learned society publishing - away from the sales-based model once again.

摘要

在第二次世界大战后的几十年里,学术团体出版商努力应对科学研究成果的不断扩大以及商业出版商越来越多地参与研究期刊出版业务。在这种竞争环境下,学术团体期刊能否在战后世界实现经济生存?或者,销售型商业出版模式的出现——与传统的期刊补贴出版模式形成对比——是否为改变学术团体常常不稳定的财务状况提供了一个机会?但也存在着生存威胁:如果商业公司能够成功地出版科学期刊,那么学术团体出版商是否不再需要?本文通过调查伦敦皇家学会和纳菲尔德基金会组织的活动,研究了英国学术团体出版商如何适应战后世界的新经济现实,这些活动最终促成了 1963 年的报告 。它揭示了战后几十年是将科学研究商品化并出售给图书馆的时期,而不是作为学术使命的一部分进行传播。对于那些希望再次将学术出版(包括学术团体出版)从销售型模式转变的人来说,这将是必读之选。

相似文献

1
Self-help for learned journals: Scientific societies and the commerce of publishing in the 1950s.
Hist Sci. 2022 Jun;60(2):255-279. doi: 10.1177/0073275321999901. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
2
A Learned Society's Perspective on Publishing.
J Neurochem. 2016 Oct;139 Suppl 2:17-23. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13674. Epub 2016 Aug 17.
3
[The different models of scientific journals].
Med Trop Sante Int. 2023 Dec 8;3(4). doi: 10.48327/mtsi.v3i4.2023.454. eCollection 2023 Dec 31.
4
PUBLISHING SOUTH AFRICAN SCHOLARSHIP IN THE GLOBAL ACADEMIC COMMUNITY.
Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2015 Sep 20;69(3):301-20. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2015.0033.
5
JOURNALS, LEARNED SOCIETIES AND MONEY: PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS, CA. 1750-1900.
Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2015 Sep 20;69(3):277-99. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2015.0032.
6
[Do journals need societies, and do societies need journals?].
Recenti Prog Med. 2023 Mar;114(3):154-156. doi: 10.1701/3981.39639.
8
A study of innovative features in scholarly open access journals.
J Med Internet Res. 2011 Dec 16;13(4):e115. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1802.
9
Making Public Ahead of Print: Meetings and Publications at The Royal Society, 1752-1892.
Notes Rec R Soc Lond. 2016 Dec 20;70(4):361-79. doi: 10.1098/rsnr.2016.0030.
10
Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold?
Am J Med. 2020 Jan;133(1):26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2019.07.028. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验