Department of Hematology and Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Department of Cell Therapy and Transplantation Medicine, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Int J Hematol. 2021 Jun;113(6):823-831. doi: 10.1007/s12185-021-03118-6. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
The long-term effects of pegfilgrastim administered in the first cycle of chemotherapy in day-to-day practice remain unclear. We retrospectively identified 114 patients aged ≥ 70 years with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma who received a rituximab-cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-vincristine-prednisolone (R-CHOP) regimen in our institution. Twenty-six patients received pegfilgrastim (pegfilgrastim group); of the 88 patients scheduled to receive conventional granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) when their neutrophil count decreased (neut-adjusted-G group), conventional G-CSF was ultimately administered to 57. During the first cycle of R-CHOP, the incidence of febrile neutropenia was lower in the pegfilgrastim group than in the neut-adjusted-G group (0% vs. 18%, p = 0.020). Throughout all cycles, a higher proportion of patients exhibited sustained relative dose intensity (≥ 80%) in the pegfilgrastim group than in the neut-adjusted-G group (25% vs. 4.0%, p = 0.008). A lower proportion of patients received a reduced dose in the second cycle in the pegfilgrastim group than in the neut-adjusted-G group (0% vs. 10%, p = 0.116). Although the differences were not significant, the pegfilgrastim group showed higher progression-free survival and overall survival than the neut-adjusted-G group. Adequate prevention of febrile neutropenia using pegfilgrastim during the first cycle of R-CHOP may contribute to avoidance of dose intensity reduction in all cycles.
在日常实践中,化疗第一周期中给予培非格司亭对长期效果仍不清楚。我们回顾性分析了 114 例年龄≥70 岁的弥漫性大 B 细胞淋巴瘤患者,这些患者在我院接受利妥昔单抗-环磷酰胺-多柔比星-长春新碱-泼尼松(R-CHOP)方案治疗。26 例患者接受了培非格司亭(培非格司亭组);在 88 例计划在中性粒细胞计数下降时使用常规粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)的患者中,最终有 57 例使用了常规 G-CSF(中性粒细胞调整-G 组)。在 R-CHOP 的第一周期中,培非格司亭组发热性中性粒细胞减少症的发生率低于中性粒细胞调整-G 组(0% vs. 18%,p=0.020)。在所有周期中,培非格司亭组患者的持续相对剂量强度(≥80%)比例高于中性粒细胞调整-G 组(25% vs. 4.0%,p=0.008)。培非格司亭组患者在第二周期接受减少剂量的比例低于中性粒细胞调整-G 组(0% vs. 10%,p=0.116)。虽然差异无统计学意义,但培非格司亭组的无进展生存率和总生存率高于中性粒细胞调整-G 组。在 R-CHOP 的第一周期中使用培非格司亭充分预防发热性中性粒细胞减少症可能有助于避免所有周期的剂量强度降低。