Suppr超能文献

[德国巴登-符腾堡州新冠疫情第一阶段的初级保健策略与合作]

[Primary Care Strategies and Cooperation During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany].

作者信息

Stengel Sandra, Roth Catharina, Breckner Amanda, Peters-Klimm Frank, Schwill Simon, Möllinger Sophia, Buhlinger-Göpfarth Nicola, Szecsenyi Joachim, Wensing Michel

机构信息

Abteilung Allgemeinmedizin und Versorgungsforschung, UniversitätsKlinikum Heidelberg,Heidelberg, Deutschland.

75181 Pforzheim, Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. Nicola Buhlinger-Göpfarth & Dr. Eleonore Fritz, Pforzheim, Deutschland.

出版信息

Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Apr;83(4):250-257. doi: 10.1055/a-1397-7527. Epub 2021 Mar 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to give an early snapshot of primary care strategies that were implemented to cope with the early period of the COVID-19 pandemic in Baden-Wuerttemberg (Germany).

METHODS

In June 2020, all 271 outpatient SARS-CoV-2 contact points, established by the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians (16 centers for testing, 204 specialized family practices, 51 Outpatients Corona Centers), and a randomly generated sample of 400 primary care practices of Baden-Wuerttemberg were invited to take part in a paper-based questionnaire. The data were gathered anonymously and analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

Out of those invited, n=63 (15.8%) primary care practices and n=92 (33.9%) SARS-CoV-2 contact points participated; 78.7% of the primary care practices cooperated with SARS-CoV-2 contact points (n=48). In all, 92.1% had implemented a compulsory registration by phone for patients with (suspected) COVID-19 (n=58) and 81% offered consultation exclusively by phone or video in case of a mild courses (n=51). The new outpatient SARS-CoV-2 contact points were established in collaboration with several stakeholders, mainly led by primary care physicians (n=76, 82.6%) and almost 50% of these were established in March 2020 (n=42, 48.3%). The most commonly reported method of registration was regulated mainly by primary care practices (n=88, 95.7%) and public health departments (n=74, 80.4%). In 92.4% (n=85) of cases, it was possible to register by phone. The consultation response was most commonly given in the form of oral information to the patient (n=65, 77.4%). Less then 50% of the SARS-CoV-2 contact points used standardized sheets for registration, documentation and consultation. The assessment of future primary care structures for (suspected) COVID-19 patients were heterogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

Effort, improvisation and collaboration were required for a successful and rapid implementation of measures for primary care during the initial period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Impulses for ongoing development of primary care strategies during a pandemic can be derived out of these results.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在对德国巴登-符腾堡州为应对新冠疫情初期而实施的初级保健策略进行早期概述。

方法

2020年6月,邀请了由法定医疗保险医师全国协会设立的所有271个门诊新冠病毒接触点(16个检测中心、204个专科家庭诊所、51个门诊新冠中心)以及从巴登-符腾堡州随机抽取的400个初级保健诊所参与纸质问卷调查。数据以匿名方式收集并进行描述性分析。

结果

在受邀对象中,有63个(15.8%)初级保健诊所和92个(33.9%)新冠病毒接触点参与;78.7%的初级保健诊所与新冠病毒接触点合作(48个)。总体而言,92.1%的机构对(疑似)新冠患者实施了电话强制登记(58个),81%的机构在轻症情况下仅通过电话或视频提供咨询(51个)。新的门诊新冠病毒接触点是与多个利益相关方合作设立的,主要由初级保健医生主导(76个,82.6%),其中近50%于2020年3月设立(42个,48.3%)。最常报告的登记方式主要由初级保健诊所(88个,95.7%)和公共卫生部门(74个,80.4%)规定。在92.4%(85个)的情况下,可以通过电话登记。咨询回复最常见的形式是向患者提供口头信息(65个,77.4%)。不到50%的新冠病毒接触点使用标准化表格进行登记、记录和咨询。对(疑似)新冠患者未来初级保健结构的评估存在差异。

结论

在新冠疫情初期,成功快速实施初级保健措施需要付出努力、进行临时应对和开展合作。这些结果可为疫情期间初级保健策略的持续发展提供动力。

相似文献

1
[Primary Care Strategies and Cooperation During the First Phase of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany].
Gesundheitswesen. 2021 Apr;83(4):250-257. doi: 10.1055/a-1397-7527. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
4
Epidemiological analysis of 3,219 COVID-19 outbreaks in the state of Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany.
Epidemiol Infect. 2021 Apr 23;149:e101. doi: 10.1017/S0950268821000911.
5
Perspectives of physicians and medical assistants on the implementation of NAAT-based point-of-care testing for SARS-CoV-2 in primary care in Germany.
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2022 Dec;175:43-49. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2022.09.006. Epub 2022 Nov 10.
9
COVID-19 pandemic and waiting times in outpatient specialist care in Germany: an empirical analysis.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Oct 11;21(1):1076. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07094-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Lessons on the COVID-19 pandemic, for and by primary care professionals worldwide.
Eur J Gen Pract. 2020 Dec;26(1):129-133. doi: 10.1080/13814788.2020.1820479.
2
COVID-19 and primary care in six countries.
BJGP Open. 2020 Oct 27;4(4). doi: 10.3399/bjgpopen20X101128. Print 2020 Oct.
4
Emergency management in fever clinic during the outbreak of COVID-19: an experience from Zhuhai.
Epidemiol Infect. 2020 Aug 7;148:e174. doi: 10.1017/S0950268820001764.
5
Case characteristics, resource use, and outcomes of 10 021 patients with COVID-19 admitted to 920 German hospitals: an observational study.
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Sep;8(9):853-862. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30316-7. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
6
Australia's national COVID-19 primary care response.
Med J Aust. 2020 Aug;213(3):104-106.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50693. Epub 2020 Jul 4.
8
Challenges of the Pandemic Response in Primary Care during Pre-Vaccination Period: A Qualitative Study.
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2015 Oct 15;4:32. doi: 10.1186/s13584-015-0028-5. eCollection 2015.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验