Reidy Katherine, Kelly Brendan D
Registrar in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, D24 NR0A, Ireland.
Professor of Psychiatry and Consultant Psychiatrist, Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, D24 NR0A, Ireland.
Ir J Psychol Med. 2024 Mar;41(1):119-124. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2020.136. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
Although significant progress has been made in Irish mental health law in recent decades, the Mental Health Act, 2001 still falls short of properly protecting human rights. A consideration of human rights developments, both domestically and internationally, highlights the urgent need for reform. In this paper we consider Sections 4 ('Best interests'), 3 ('Mental disorder') and 57 ('Treatment not requiring consent') of the 2001 Act and related recommendations in the 2015 Report of the Expert Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act, 2001, and suggest specific areas for reform. Just as medicine evolves over time, so too does our understanding of human rights and law. While embracing a human rights-based approach to the extent suggested here might be seen as aspirational, it is important to balance achievable goals with higher ideals if progress is to be made and rights are to be respected.
尽管近几十年来爱尔兰精神卫生法取得了重大进展,但2001年《精神卫生法》在妥善保护人权方面仍有不足。对国内外人权发展情况的考量凸显了改革的迫切需求。在本文中,我们审视了2001年法案的第4条(“最大利益”)、第3条(“精神障碍”)和第57条(“无需同意的治疗”)以及2001年《精神卫生法》审查专家组2015年报告中的相关建议,并提出了具体的改革领域。正如医学随着时间的推移而发展一样,我们对人权和法律的理解也是如此。虽然在这里所建议的程度上采用基于人权的方法可能被视为一种抱负,但如果要取得进展并尊重权利,将可实现的目标与更高的理想相平衡是很重要的。