• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

爱尔兰2001年《精神健康法》第4、3和57条规定下的非自愿状态及治疗决策的精神能力:分析与改革建议

Involuntary status and mental capacity for treatment decisions under Sections 4, 3, and 57 of Ireland's Mental Health Act, 2001: analysis and recommendations for reform.

作者信息

Reidy Katherine, Kelly Brendan D

机构信息

Registrar in Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, D24 NR0A, Ireland.

Professor of Psychiatry and Consultant Psychiatrist, Department of Psychiatry, Trinity College Dublin, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Tallaght University Hospital, Dublin 24, D24 NR0A, Ireland.

出版信息

Ir J Psychol Med. 2024 Mar;41(1):119-124. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2020.136. Epub 2021 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1017/ipm.2020.136
PMID:33745472
Abstract

Although significant progress has been made in Irish mental health law in recent decades, the Mental Health Act, 2001 still falls short of properly protecting human rights. A consideration of human rights developments, both domestically and internationally, highlights the urgent need for reform. In this paper we consider Sections 4 ('Best interests'), 3 ('Mental disorder') and 57 ('Treatment not requiring consent') of the 2001 Act and related recommendations in the 2015 Report of the Expert Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act, 2001, and suggest specific areas for reform. Just as medicine evolves over time, so too does our understanding of human rights and law. While embracing a human rights-based approach to the extent suggested here might be seen as aspirational, it is important to balance achievable goals with higher ideals if progress is to be made and rights are to be respected.

摘要

尽管近几十年来爱尔兰精神卫生法取得了重大进展,但2001年《精神卫生法》在妥善保护人权方面仍有不足。对国内外人权发展情况的考量凸显了改革的迫切需求。在本文中,我们审视了2001年法案的第4条(“最大利益”)、第3条(“精神障碍”)和第57条(“无需同意的治疗”)以及2001年《精神卫生法》审查专家组2015年报告中的相关建议,并提出了具体的改革领域。正如医学随着时间的推移而发展一样,我们对人权和法律的理解也是如此。虽然在这里所建议的程度上采用基于人权的方法可能被视为一种抱负,但如果要取得进展并尊重权利,将可实现的目标与更高的理想相平衡是很重要的。

相似文献

1
Involuntary status and mental capacity for treatment decisions under Sections 4, 3, and 57 of Ireland's Mental Health Act, 2001: analysis and recommendations for reform.爱尔兰2001年《精神健康法》第4、3和57条规定下的非自愿状态及治疗决策的精神能力:分析与改革建议
Ir J Psychol Med. 2024 Mar;41(1):119-124. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2020.136. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
2
The reform of Irish mental health law: Aligning with human rights obligations?爱尔兰精神卫生法改革:符合人权义务?
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2024 Jul-Aug;95:102004. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2024.102004. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
3
Irish Medical Organisation Doolin Memorial Lecture 2019: rhetoric and reality in mental health-Ireland and the world.爱尔兰医学组织杜林纪念讲座 2019:精神健康领域的夸夸其谈与现实状况——爱尔兰和世界。
Ir J Med Sci. 2020 Aug;189(3):1127-1134. doi: 10.1007/s11845-019-02163-9. Epub 2019 Dec 13.
4
Mental health legislation in Ireland: a lot done, more to do.爱尔兰的心理健康立法:已做很多,仍有更多要做。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2012;40(2):266-9.
5
Dignity, human rights and the limits of mental health legislation.尊严、人权与精神卫生立法的局限
Ir J Psychol Med. 2014 Jun;31(2):75-81. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2014.22.
6
Mental health legislation and human rights in England, Wales and the Republic of Ireland.英格兰、威尔士和爱尔兰共和国的精神卫生立法与人权
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2011 Nov-Dec;34(6):439-54. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.10.009. Epub 2011 Nov 21.
7
Ireland's Mental Health Bill 2024: progress, problems and Procrustean perils.爱尔兰2024年《精神健康法案》:进展、问题与普洛克路斯忒斯之险
Ir J Med Sci. 2024 Dec;193(6):2897-2914. doi: 10.1007/s11845-024-03806-2. Epub 2024 Sep 27.
8
Revising, reforming, reframing: Report of the Expert Group on the Review of the Mental Health Act 2001 (2015).
Ir J Psychol Med. 2015 Jun;32(2):161-166. doi: 10.1017/ipm.2015.16.
9
England's rate of involuntary psychiatric admission is double that of the Republic of Ireland: Why? A consideration of some possible causes.英格兰非自愿精神科住院率是爱尔兰共和国的两倍:为什么?一些可能原因的考虑。
Med Sci Law. 2022 Jan;62(1):64-69. doi: 10.1177/00258024211029071. Epub 2021 Jun 25.
10
Women's right to health and Ireland's abortion laws.妇女的健康权与爱尔兰的堕胎法律。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2015 Jul;130(1):93-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.04.020. Epub 2015 Apr 17.