• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共识观点对能力和教学方法的跨专业课程的补充和综合医学:德尔菲研究。

Consensus views on competencies and teaching methods for an interprofessional curriculum on complementary and integrative medicine: A Delphi study.

机构信息

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

Department of General Practice and Health Services Research, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

J Integr Med. 2021 May;19(3):282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 6.

DOI:10.1016/j.joim.2021.03.001
PMID:33745897
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

A collaborative team is necessary to help patients achieve their healthcare goals using complementary medicine. At present, healthcare professionals do not feel sufficiently qualified to provide this service. This study sought to identify competencies and teaching methods for interprofessional training on complementary and integrative medicine at medical schools.

METHODS

Sixty-five German-speaking experts with various professional backgrounds were invited to take part in a three-round Delphi study. In the first round, predefined competencies were assessed on a seven-point Likert scale, and participants were invited to propose additional competencies that would be evaluated in the subsequent rounds. The competencies were ranked based on the participant assessments and were assigned to four relevance groups. In the second and third rounds, suitable teaching methods were identified using free-text fields and multiple-choice questions. In a final workshop, participants synthesized the outcomes of the previous sessions and derived key competencies that would be a benefit to undergraduate interprofessional training in complementary and integrative medicine at medical schools.

RESULTS

The three rounds plus final worksop were attended by 50, 40, 36 and 11 experts. The competencies that these experts determined to be highly relevant to teaching complementary and integrative medicine emphasized, in particular, the respectful treatment of patients and the importance of taking a medical history. From these highly relevant competencies, three key targets were agreed upon in the final workshop: students are able to 1) classify and assess complementary medical terms and methods; 2) work collaboratively and integrate patients into the interprofessional team; 3) involve patients and their relatives respectfully and empathetically in all healthcare processes. To achieve these competency goals, the following teaching methods were highlighted: students discuss therapy options based on authentic patient cases with each other and practice empathic patient communication incorporating complementary medicine. Further, the theoretical background of complementary medicines could be provided as online-training, to use the class sessions for hands-on exercises and interprofessional exchange and discussion.

CONCLUSION

Despite the heterogeneous panel of experts, a consensus was reached on the competency orientation and teaching approaches. The results can promote the implementation of interprofessional training for complementary medicine in undergraduate education.

摘要

目的

为了帮助患者通过补充医学实现其医疗保健目标,需要建立一个协作团队。目前,医疗保健专业人员觉得自己没有足够的资格提供这项服务。本研究旨在确定医学院校补充和整合医学的跨专业培训的能力和教学方法。

方法

邀请 65 名具有不同专业背景的德语专家参加三轮德尔菲研究。在第一轮中,根据七点李克特量表评估预定义的能力,并邀请参与者提出将在后续轮次中评估的其他能力。根据参与者的评估对能力进行排名,并将其分配到四个相关组中。在第二轮和第三轮中,使用自由文本字段和多项选择题确定合适的教学方法。在最后一次研讨会上,参与者综合了之前各轮次的结果,并得出对医学本科补充和整合医学跨专业培训有益的关键能力。

结果

三轮加最终研讨会共有 50、40、36 和 11 名专家参加。这些专家认为与补充和整合医学教学高度相关的能力特别强调了对患者的尊重和病史的重要性。从这些高度相关的能力中,最终研讨会达成了三个关键目标:学生能够 1)对补充医学术语和方法进行分类和评估;2)协作并将患者融入跨专业团队;3)在所有医疗保健过程中尊重并同情地让患者及其家属参与。为了实现这些能力目标,突出强调了以下教学方法:学生根据具有补充医学内容的真实患者病例相互讨论治疗方案,并练习包含补充医学内容的共情患者沟通。此外,还可以将补充医学的理论背景作为在线培训提供,以便在课堂上进行实践练习、跨专业交流和讨论。

结论

尽管专家小组具有异质性,但就能力倾向和教学方法达成了共识。研究结果可以促进本科教育中补充医学的跨专业培训的实施。

相似文献

1
Consensus views on competencies and teaching methods for an interprofessional curriculum on complementary and integrative medicine: A Delphi study.共识观点对能力和教学方法的跨专业课程的补充和综合医学:德尔菲研究。
J Integr Med. 2021 May;19(3):282-290. doi: 10.1016/j.joim.2021.03.001. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
2
Findings from a three-round Delphi study: essential topics for interprofessional training on complementary and integrative medicine.三轮德尔菲研究结果:补充和整合医学的跨专业培训的基本主题。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):348. doi: 10.1186/s12906-020-03140-x.
3
Role competencies in interprofessional undergraduate education in complementary and integrative medicine: A Delphi study.跨专业本科补充与整合医学教育的角色能力:德尔菲研究。
Complement Ther Med. 2020 Nov;54:102542. doi: 10.1016/j.ctim.2020.102542. Epub 2020 Aug 22.
4
Validating competencies for an undergraduate training program in rural medicine using the Delphi technique.运用德尔菲法验证农村医学本科培训项目的能力要求
Rural Remote Health. 2016 Oct-Dec;16(4):3851. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
5
Competencies for optimal practice in integrated environments: examining attributes of a consensus interprofessional practice document from the licensed integrative health disciplines.整合环境中最佳实践的能力:从持照的综合健康学科审查共识的跨专业实践文件的属性。
Explore (NY). 2013 Sep-Oct;9(5):285-91. doi: 10.1016/j.explore.2013.06.006.
6
Naturopathy, complementary and integrative medicine in medical education - position paper by the GMA Committee Integrative Medicine and Perspective Pluralism.顺势疗法、补充和整合医学在医学教育中的地位——德国医师公会整合医学与多元化视角委员会的立场文件。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Apr 14;39(2):Doc16. doi: 10.3205/zma001537. eCollection 2022.
7
Developing a Competency-based Curriculum in Basic and Clinical Pharmacology--A Delphi Study among Physicians.制定基于能力的基础与临床药理学课程——一项针对医生的德尔菲研究
Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2015 Dec;117(6):413-20. doi: 10.1111/bcpt.12436. Epub 2015 Jul 22.
8
Development of an international undergraduate curriculum for delirium using a modified delphi process.运用改良德尔菲法制定国际本科谵妄课程。
Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):131-137. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx133.
9
Clinical Teaching Competencies in Physical Therapist Education: A Modified Delphi Study.物理治疗师教育中的临床教学能力:一项改良 Delphi 研究。
Phys Ther. 2022 Jul 4;102(7). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzac063.
10
A Delphi consensus study for teaching "Basic Trauma Management" to third-year medical students.德尔菲共识研究:向医学三年级学生教授“基本创伤管理”。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2019 Oct 17;27(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s13049-019-0675-6.

引用本文的文献

1
A pre- and post-course survey of an elective Chinese medicine curriculum among junior Western medical students in Taiwan.台湾西医低年级学生选修中医课程的课前与课后调查。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 Jan 22;25(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04704-x.
2
Screening and evaluation of key technologies for non-bioartificial liver care: an empirical study.非生物人工肝护理关键技术的筛选与评价:一项实证研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jan 7;11:1459428. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1459428. eCollection 2024.
3
How Delphi studies in the health sciences find consensus: a scoping review.
健康科学领域的德尔菲研究如何达成共识:一项范围综述
Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 14;14(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02738-3.
4
Naturopathy, complementary and integrative medicine in medical education - position paper by the GMA Committee Integrative Medicine and Perspective Pluralism.顺势疗法、补充和整合医学在医学教育中的地位——德国医师公会整合医学与多元化视角委员会的立场文件。
GMS J Med Educ. 2022 Apr 14;39(2):Doc16. doi: 10.3205/zma001537. eCollection 2022.