Scherman Ashley, Wiedrick Jack, Lang William, Rdesinski Rebecca, Lapidus Jodi, McEvoy Cynthia, Abu-Shamsieh Aimee, Buckley Scott, Rogers Brian, Buist Neil
Department of Pediatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Helfgott Research Institute, National University of Natural Medicine, Portland, OR, USA.
Res Rep Neonatol. 2018;8:53-63. doi: 10.2147/rrn.s165421. Epub 2018 Oct 8.
We developed summaries of oral bottle-feeding skills among preterm (<37 gestational weeks) and full-term (≥37 gestational weeks) infants using a mechanical device (Orometer) to measure intraoral pressure changes, with accompanying automated software and analytics. We then compared the rates of change in feeding skills over several weeks (feeding trends) between preterm and full-term infants. We also compared group means at 40 weeks post menstrual age (PMA).
Healthy full-term and preterm infants capable of oral feeding were recruited from the Pediatric Outpatient Clinic at University of California San Francisco, Fresno, and from the Oregon Health & Science University Doernbecher Neonatal Critical Care Unit, respectively. Feeding skill was quantified using an Orometer and automated suck-analysis software. Factor analysis reduced the >40 metrics produced by the Orometer system to the following seven factors that accounted for >99% of the sample covariance: suck vigor, endurance, resting, irregularity, frequency, variability, and bursting. We proposed that these factors represent feeding skills and they served as the dependent variables in linear models estimating trends in feeding skills over time for full-term and preterm infants (maturation). At approximately 40 weeks PMA we compared mean feedings skills between infants born preterm and those born full-term using predictions from our models.
Feeding skills for 117 full-term infants and 82 preterm infants were first captured at mean PMA of 42.3 and 36.0 weeks, respectively. For some feeding skills, preterm and full-term infants showed different trends over time. At 37-40 weeks PMA, preterm infants took approximately 15% fewer sucks than infants born full-term (p=0.06) and generally had weaker suck vigor, greater resting, and less endurance than full-term babies. Preterm infant-feeding skills appeared similar to those of full-term infants upon reaching ≥40 weeks PMA, although preterm infants showed greater variability for all factors.
The Orometer device, accompanying software, and analytic methods provided a framework for describing trends in oral feeding, thereby allowing us to characterize differences in maturation of feeding between healthy preterm and full-term infants.
我们使用一种机械装置(口腔压力计)来测量口腔内压力变化,并配套自动化软件和分析方法,对早产(孕周<37周)和足月(孕周≥37周)婴儿的奶瓶喂养技能进行了总结。然后,我们比较了早产和足月婴儿在数周内喂养技能的变化率(喂养趋势)。我们还比较了月经龄40周时两组的均值。
分别从加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校弗雷斯诺儿科门诊和俄勒冈健康与科学大学多恩贝彻新生儿重症监护病房招募能够进行奶瓶喂养的健康足月和早产婴儿。使用口腔压力计和自动化吸吮分析软件对喂养技能进行量化。因子分析将口腔压力计系统产生的40多个指标简化为以下七个因子,这些因子占样本协方差的99%以上:吸吮力度、耐力、静息状态、不规则性、频率、变异性和爆发性。我们认为这些因子代表喂养技能,并作为线性模型中的因变量,用于估计足月和早产婴儿喂养技能随时间的趋势(成熟度)。在月经龄约40周时,我们使用模型预测比较了早产和足月出生婴儿的平均喂养技能。
分别在平均月经龄42.3周和36.0周时首次记录了117名足月婴儿和82名早产婴儿的喂养技能。对于某些喂养技能,早产和足月婴儿随时间呈现不同趋势。在月经龄37 - 40周时,早产婴儿的吸吮次数比足月出生婴儿少约15%(p = 0.06),并且通常比足月婴儿的吸吮力度弱、静息状态更强、耐力更差。尽管早产婴儿在所有因子上的变异性更大,但在达到≥40周月经龄时,其喂养技能似乎与足月婴儿相似。
口腔压力计装置、配套软件和分析方法为描述奶瓶喂养趋势提供了一个框架,从而使我们能够表征健康早产和足月婴儿喂养成熟度的差异。