Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 135 College Street, Suite 355, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy (InCHIP), University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.
AIDS Behav. 2021 Nov;25(11):3743-3753. doi: 10.1007/s10461-021-03227-7. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
Scale-up of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) in people who inject drugs (PWID) remains suboptimal. Patient-level factors are often complex and may contribute to scale-up. Using cross-sectional data from 234 opioid-dependent patients on methadone who met eligibility criteria for PrEP, we conducted logistic regression analyses to assess potential moderators associated with being on PrEP (n = 60). Mean provider trust was significantly higher among Blacks vs Whites (39.4 vs 34.9; p = 0.002) and non-homeless vs homeless participants (37.5 vs 34.8; p = 0.008). Though race/ethnicity was not a significant moderator on provider trust and PrEP use, increased provider trust was marginally associated with increased PrEP use among Blacks (p = 0.058). Additionally, homelessness significantly moderated provider trust and PrEP use (p = 0.024). Provider trust among non-homeless participants was positively correlated with PrEP use (p = 0.013) but not among homeless participants. Strategies that promote provider trust in Blacks and non-homeless PWID on methadone may improve PrEP scale-up.
在注射毒品者(PWID)中扩大暴露前预防(PrEP)的规模仍然不理想。患者层面的因素往往很复杂,可能会影响扩大规模。我们使用了符合 PrEP 资格标准的 234 名接受美沙酮治疗的阿片类药物依赖患者的横断面数据,进行了逻辑回归分析,以评估与接受 PrEP 相关的潜在调节因素(n=60)。与白人相比,黑人的平均提供者信任度显著更高(39.4 对 34.9;p=0.002),与无家可归者相比,非无家可归者的参与者更高(37.5 对 34.8;p=0.008)。尽管种族/民族并不是提供者信任度和 PrEP 使用的显著调节因素,但提供者信任度的增加与黑人中 PrEP 使用的增加呈边缘相关(p=0.058)。此外,无家可归状况显著调节了提供者信任度和 PrEP 使用(p=0.024)。非无家可归参与者中的提供者信任度与 PrEP 使用呈正相关(p=0.013),但无家可归参与者中则没有。促进黑人以及美沙酮治疗的无家可归 PWID 对提供者信任的策略可能会促进 PrEP 的扩大规模。