• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与尼古丁蒸气产品相关的健康和风险信息的内容和来源可信度是否会影响危害认知和行为意向?系统评价。

Does the content and source credibility of health and risk messages related to nicotine vaping products have an impact on harm perception and behavioural intentions? A systematic review.

机构信息

Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Nathan, QLD, Australia.

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Gold Coast, QLD, Australia.

出版信息

Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3290-3303. doi: 10.1111/add.15473. Epub 2021 Apr 8.

DOI:10.1111/add.15473
PMID:33751707
Abstract

AIMS

To systematically review the literature on (i) whether and how various risk messages about nicotine vaping products (NVPs) alter harm perception and behavioural intentions of smokers and non-smokers and (ii) how trust in sources of NVP risk communication affects message reception and behavioural intentions.

METHODS

Seven electronic databases and reference lists of relevant articles were searched for articles published up to April 2020. Experimental and quasi-experimental studies on message effects and cross-sectional studies on source credibility were included. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Evidence Project Risk of Bias Tool were used to assess the quality of observational and intervention studies, respectively. For each outcome variable, we indicated whether there was an effect (as a 'yes' or 'no') and used effect direction plots to display information on the direction of effects.

RESULTS

Nicotine addiction messages resulted in greater health and addiction risk perceptions, relative risk messages comparing the health risks of NVPs to cigarette smoking increased the perception that NVPs are less harmful than combustible cigarettes, and a nicotine fact sheet corrected misperceptions of nicotine and NVPs. Smokers' intention to purchase, try or switch to NVPs was higher when exposed to a relative risk message and lower when exposed to nicotine addiction warnings. Trust in NVP risk information from public health agencies was associated with lower odds of; (i) NVP use and (ii) perceiving NVPs as less harmful, whereas those who trusted information from NVP companies were more likely to perceive NVPs as less harmful than combustible cigarettes.

CONCLUSIONS

Relative risk messages may help improve the accuracy of harm perceptions of nicotine vaping products and increase smokers' intentions to quit smoking and/or to switch to vaping, although the literature is nascent.

摘要

目的

系统回顾关于以下方面的文献:(i)各种关于尼古丁雾化产品(NVP)的风险信息是否以及如何改变吸烟者和非吸烟者对危害的感知和行为意向;(ii)对 NVP 风险传播来源的信任如何影响信息接收和行为意向。

方法

检索了截至 2020 年 4 月发表的文章,使用了 7 个电子数据库和相关文章的参考文献列表。纳入了关于信息效果的实验和准实验研究以及关于来源可信度的横断面研究。使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和证据项目偏倚风险工具分别评估观察性研究和干预性研究的质量。对于每个结果变量,我们表示是否存在影响(“是”或“否”),并使用效应方向图显示关于效应方向的信息。

结果

尼古丁成瘾信息导致对健康和成瘾风险的感知增加,与比较 NVP 与吸烟危害的相对风险信息相比,增加了 NVP 比可燃香烟危害更小的感知,尼古丁情况说明书纠正了对尼古丁和 NVP 的错误认知。当暴露于相对风险信息时,吸烟者购买、尝试或转向 NVP 的意愿更高,而当暴露于尼古丁成瘾警告时,这种意愿则更低。对来自公共卫生机构的 NVP 风险信息的信任与以下情况的可能性较低有关:(i)NVP 使用;(ii)将 NVP 视为危害较小,而那些信任 NVP 公司信息的人则更有可能将 NVP 视为比可燃香烟危害更小。

结论

相对风险信息可能有助于提高对尼古丁雾化产品危害的认识的准确性,并增加吸烟者戒烟和/或转向电子烟的意愿,尽管文献尚处于起步阶段。

相似文献

1
Does the content and source credibility of health and risk messages related to nicotine vaping products have an impact on harm perception and behavioural intentions? A systematic review.与尼古丁蒸气产品相关的健康和风险信息的内容和来源可信度是否会影响危害认知和行为意向?系统评价。
Addiction. 2021 Dec;116(12):3290-3303. doi: 10.1111/add.15473. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
2
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 29;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub9.
3
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Nov 17;11(11):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub7.
4
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 14;9(9):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub6.
5
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 8;1(1):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub8.
6
Pharmacological and electronic cigarette interventions for smoking cessation in adults: component network meta-analyses.药物和电子烟干预成人戒烟的效果:成分网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Sep 12;9(9):CD015226. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015226.pub2.
7
Heated tobacco products for smoking cessation and reducing smoking prevalence.加热烟草制品戒烟和降低吸烟率。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jan 6;1(1):CD013790. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013790.pub2.
8
Mindfulness for smoking cessation.正念戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 14;4(4):CD013696. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013696.pub2.
9
A systematic review of randomized controlled trials and network meta-analysis of e-cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟的系统评价随机对照试验和网络荟萃分析。
Addict Behav. 2021 Aug;119:106912. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2021.106912. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
10
Interventions for preventing weight gain after smoking cessation.戒烟后预防体重增加的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Oct 6;10(10):CD006219. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006219.pub4.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacists' Perspectives on Nicotine Vaping Products (NVPs) for Smoking Cessation in Australia: A Qualitative Analysis.澳大利亚药剂师对用于戒烟的尼古丁电子烟产品的看法:一项定性分析
Pharmacy (Basel). 2025 Jan 29;13(1):11. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy13010011.
2
Message development for a communication campaign to support health warning labels on cigars: a qualitative study.支持雪茄健康警示标签的传播活动的信息开发:一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 19;24(1):3535. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-21097-1.
3
A Content Analysis of Nicotine Descriptors on the Front of Vape Packaging in the United Kingdom.
英国电子烟包装正面尼古丁描述符的内容分析
Nicotine Tob Res. 2024 Dec 23;27(1):152-156. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae168.
4
Harm perceptions across vaping product features: An on-line cross-sectional survey of adults who smoke and/or vape in the United Kingdom.对各类电子烟产品特点的危害认知:针对英国吸烟和/或吸电子烟成年人的在线横断面调查。
Addiction. 2025 Mar;120(3):524-538. doi: 10.1111/add.16572. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
5
The Role of e-Cigarette Packaging as a Health Communications Tool: A Focus Group Study With Adolescents and Adults in England and Scotland.电子烟包装作为健康传播工具的作用:对英格兰和苏格兰青少年及成年人的焦点小组研究
Nicotine Tob Res. 2025 Mar 24;27(4):705-713. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntae107.
6
How Do Behavioral Framing, Linguistic Certainty, and Target Specification Impact Responses to Vaping Prevention Messages?行为框架、语言确定性和目标说明如何影响对电子烟预防信息的反应?
J Health Commun. 2024 Jul 2;29(7):420-431. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2024.2355299. Epub 2024 May 20.
7
Media Search Frequency, Source Credibility About e-Cigarette Health Information, and Motivation to Quit EC Among University Students in Chengdu, China.中国成都大学生对电子烟健康信息的媒体搜索频率、信息来源可信度及戒烟动机
Int J Gen Med. 2024 Mar 8;17:895-907. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S430997. eCollection 2024.
8
Trends in Harm Perceptions of E-Cigarettes vs Cigarettes Among Adults Who Smoke in England, 2014-2023.英格兰成年烟民对电子烟和香烟危害感知的变化趋势,2014-2023 年。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Feb 5;7(2):e240582. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0582.
9
Warning Labels as a Public Health Intervention: Effects and Challenges for Tobacco, Cannabis, and Opioid Medications.警示标签作为一种公共卫生干预措施:对烟草、大麻和阿片类药物的影响和挑战。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):425-442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-042254. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
10
Noticing education campaigns or public health messages about vaping among youth in the United States, Canada and England from 2018 to 2022.注意到 2018 年至 2022 年期间美国、加拿大和英国针对青少年的电子烟宣传教育活动或公共卫生信息。
Health Educ Res. 2024 Jan 23;39(1):12-28. doi: 10.1093/her/cyad044.