文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

头颈部癌症患者接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗后采用西妥昔单抗为基础的挽救化疗的安全性和疗效。

Safety and Efficacy of Cetuximab-Based Salvage Chemotherapy After Checkpoint Inhibitors in Head and Neck Cancer.

机构信息

Medical Oncology Department, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria San Carlos, Hospital Clínico Universitario San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Cáncer (CIBERONC), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2021 Jun;26(6):e1018-e1035. doi: 10.1002/onco.13754. Epub 2021 Apr 8.


DOI:10.1002/onco.13754
PMID:33751752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8176971/
Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are still few data on the activity and safety of cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after immunotherapy (SCAI) in patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients with SCCHN who received cetuximab-based SCAI after programmed cell death protein 1 or programmed cell death ligand 1(PD[L]1) inhibitors. Overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) with SCAI and with last chemotherapy before immunotherapy (LCBI) by RECIST 1.1, percentage change from baseline in target lesions (PCTL), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment compliance, and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: Between March 2016 and November 2019, 23 patients were identified. SCAI consisted of cetuximab-based combinations (3-weekly cisplatin-5FU-cetuximab [n = 2], weekly paclitaxel-cetuximab [n = 17], weekly cisplatin-cetuximab [n = 2], weekly carboplatin-paclitaxel-cetuximab [n = 2]). ORR was 56.5% (11 partial response, 2 complete response). DCR was 78.3%. Among 13 objective responders, median best PCTL was -53.5% (range, -30% to -100%). Median OS and PFS were 12 months and 6 months, respectively. In 10 patients receiving LCBI, ORR to LCBI was 40%, whereas ORR to SCAI achieved 60%. In LCBI-treated patients, median PFS with LCBI was 8 months and median PFS and OS with SCAI were 7 months and 12 months, respectively. Reduced dose intensity of the chemotherapy and cetuximab components occurred in 82.6% and 52.2% of the patients. Grade 1 or 2 adverse events (AEs) occurred in all patients. Grade 3 or 4 AEs developed in 65%, being grade 3 in all of them except in one patient (grade 4 neutropenia). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy after PD(L)1 inhibitors associated with high response rates and deep tumor reductions with a manageable safety profile. Subsequent lines of therapy may explain the long survival achieved in our series. These results invite to design studies to elucidate the best therapeutic sequence in patients with SCCHN in the immunotherapy era. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Cetuximab-based salvage chemotherapy (SCAI) achieved high response rates in patients with recurrent/metastatic squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) after progression to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. Objective response rate was higher than and progression-free survival was comparable to that of chemotherapy administered before immunotherapy (IO). In most patients, SCAI consisted of weekly, well-tolerated regimens. These observations have implications for current practice because of the limited evidence to date in SCCHN and the scant therapeutic options in this disease and invite to elucidate which may be the best treatment sequence for patients with head and neck cancer in the IO era.

摘要

背景:在接受程序性死亡蛋白 1 或程序性死亡配体 1(PD[L]1)抑制剂治疗后,头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)患者接受西妥昔单抗为基础的挽救化疗(SCAI)后的活性和安全性数据仍然较少。

材料和方法:这是一项回顾性研究,纳入了接受西妥昔单抗为基础的 SCAI 治疗的 SCCHN 患者,这些患者在接受程序性死亡蛋白 1 或程序性死亡配体 1(PD[L]1)抑制剂治疗后出现疾病进展。通过 RECIST 1.1 评估 SCAI 和最后一次化疗前免疫治疗(LCBI)的总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)、目标病灶的百分比变化(PCTL)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)、治疗依从性和毒性。

结果:2016 年 3 月至 2019 年 11 月,共确定了 23 例患者。SCAI 包括西妥昔单抗为基础的联合方案(每 3 周顺铂-5FU-西妥昔单抗[ n = 2],每周紫杉醇-西妥昔单抗[ n = 17],每周顺铂-西妥昔单抗[ n = 2],每周卡铂-紫杉醇-西妥昔单抗[ n = 2])。ORR 为 56.5%(11 例部分缓解,2 例完全缓解)。DCR 为 78.3%。在 13 例客观反应者中,最佳 PCTL 的中位数为-53.5%(范围为-30%至-100%)。中位 OS 和 PFS 分别为 12 个月和 6 个月。在接受 LCBI 治疗的 10 例患者中,LCBI 的 ORR 为 40%,而 SCAI 的 ORR 为 60%。在接受 LCBI 治疗的患者中,LCBI 的中位 PFS 为 8 个月,SCAI 的中位 PFS 和 OS 分别为 7 个月和 12 个月。82.6%和 52.2%的患者化疗和西妥昔单抗剂量强度降低。所有患者均发生 1 级或 2 级不良事件(AE)。65%的患者发生 3 级或 4 级 AE,除 1 例患者(4 级中性粒细胞减少症)外,所有患者均为 3 级。没有治疗相关的死亡。

结论:PD(L)1 抑制剂后西妥昔单抗为基础的挽救化疗与高缓解率和深度肿瘤缓解相关,具有可管理的安全性特征。后续的治疗线可能解释了我们系列研究中获得的长期生存。这些结果邀请设计研究,以阐明在免疫治疗时代,头颈部鳞状细胞癌患者的最佳治疗序列。

意义:在接受 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂治疗后进展的复发/转移性头颈部鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)患者中,西妥昔单抗为基础的挽救化疗(SCAI)取得了较高的缓解率。客观缓解率高于且无进展生存期与免疫治疗前(IO)化疗相当。在大多数患者中,SCAI 采用每周、耐受性良好的方案。这些观察结果对当前实践具有影响,因为迄今为止 SCCHN 领域的证据有限,而且这种疾病的治疗选择有限,因此需要阐明在 IO 时代,头颈部癌症患者的最佳治疗顺序。

相似文献

[1]
Safety and Efficacy of Cetuximab-Based Salvage Chemotherapy After Checkpoint Inhibitors in Head and Neck Cancer.

Oncologist. 2021-6

[2]
A phase II trial of paclitaxel plus biweekly cetuximab for patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer previously treated with both platinum-based chemotherapy and anti-PD-1 antibody.

ESMO Open. 2024-6

[3]
Clinical Outcomes of Cetuximab and Paclitaxel after Progression on Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Recurrent or Metastatic Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Medicina (Kaunas). 2021-10-23

[4]
Initial analysis of the synergy of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitor and concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment for recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients.

Radiat Oncol. 2023-7-4

[5]
Weekly paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE) combination followed by nivolumab for recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN).

Oral Oncol. 2023-12

[6]
Increased Response Rates to Salvage Chemotherapy Administered after PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

J Thorac Oncol. 2017-10-31

[7]
Treatment outcomes of cetuximab-containing regimen in locoregional recurrent and distant metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

BMC Cancer. 2022-12-20

[8]
First-line treatment with chemotherapy plus cetuximab in Chinese patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Efficacy and safety results of the randomised, phase III CHANGE-2 trial.

Eur J Cancer. 2021-10

[9]
Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Eur J Cancer. 2019-9-28

[10]
Weekly Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Cetuximab in Palliative Treatment of Patients with Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Oncologist. 2018-3-14

引用本文的文献

[1]
Practical Consensus Guidelines on the Use of Cetuximab in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC).

South Asian J Cancer. 2024-10-16

[2]
Paclitaxel for second-line treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: A multicenter retrospective Italian study.

World J Clin Oncol. 2024-12-24

[3]
Salvage chemotherapy after progression on immunotherapy in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell head and neck carcinoma.

Front Oncol. 2024-11-25

[4]
Alpelisib and Immunotherapy: A Promising Combination for Recurrent and Metastatic Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck.

Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024-10

[5]
The efficacy of cetuximab plus PD-1 inhibitors as salvage therapy in PD-1 refractory patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

J Cancer. 2024-1-27

[6]
Study protocol: phase II study to evaluate the effect of cetuximab monotherapy after immunotherapy with PD-1 inhibitors in patients with head and neck squamous cell cancer.

Ther Adv Med Oncol. 2024-1-19

[7]
Multimodality treatment in recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck: current therapy, challenges, and future perspectives.

Front Oncol. 2024-1-4

[8]
Chemotherapy following immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: clinical effectiveness and influence of inflammatory and nutritional factors.

Discov Oncol. 2023-8-29

[9]
Current State and Future Directions of EGFR-Directed Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer.

Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023-6

[10]
T cell effects and mechanisms in immunotherapy of head and neck tumors.

Cell Commun Signal. 2023-3-5

本文引用的文献

[1]
Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: EAGLE, a randomized, open-label phase III study.

Ann Oncol. 2020-7

[2]
Use of Immunotherapy With Programmed Cell Death 1 vs Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

JAMA Oncol. 2020-3-1

[3]
Increased clinical and plasma EBV DNA responses to platinum-gemcitabine after nivolumab in patients with heavily platinum-pretreated nasopharyngeal cancer.

Oral Oncol. 2020-4

[4]
Response rates and survival to systemic therapy after immune checkpoint inhibitor failure in recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Oral Oncol. 2020-2

[5]
Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study.

Lancet. 2019-11-1

[6]
Response to salvage chemotherapy after progression on immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

Eur J Cancer. 2019-9-28

[7]
Nivolumab treatment beyond RECIST-defined progression in recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in CheckMate 141: A subgroup analysis of a randomized phase 3 clinical trial.

Cancer. 2019-6-27

[8]
Immunotherapy Mythbusters in Head and Neck Cancer: The Abscopal Effect and Pseudoprogression.

Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019-1

[9]
Mechanisms of Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Blockade: Why Does Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Not Work for All Patients?

Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2019-1

[10]
Immune induction strategies in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer to enhance the sensitivity to PD-1 blockade: the TONIC trial.

Nat Med. 2019-5-13

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索