Suppr超能文献

影像学分析特定形态计量学和患者报告结局(PROMIS)在第 2 和 3 区第五跖骨骨折手术修复中的应用。

Radiographic analysis of specific morphometrics and patient-reported outcomes (PROMIS) for surgical repair of zones 2 and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, 676 North St. Clair Street #1350, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.

Clinica Orthobone, Rua Joaquim Floriano, 466, Conjunto 1.503 - Itaim Bibi, São Paulo, 04534-002, Brazil.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2021 Mar 22;16(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s13018-021-02331-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Zones 2 and 3 fifth metatarsal fractures are often treated with intramedullary fixation due to an increased risk of nonunion. A previous 3-dimensional (3D) computerized tomography (CT) imaging study by our group determined that the screw should stop short of the bow of the metatarsal and be larger than the commonly used 4.5 millimeter (mm) screw. This study determines how these guidelines translate to operative outcomes, measured using Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Function (PF) and Pain Interference (PI) surveys. Radiographic variables measuring the height of the medial longitudinal arch and degree of metatarsus adductus were also obtained to determine if these measurements had any effect on outcomes. And lastly, this study aimed to determine if morphologic differences between males and females affected surgical outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified 23 patients (14 male, 9 female) who met inclusion criteria. Eighteen patients completed PROMIS surveys. Preoperative PROMIS surveys were completed prior to surgery, rather than retroactively. Weightbearing radiographs were also obtained preoperatively to assist with surgical planning and postoperatively to assess interval healing. Correlation coefficients were calculated between PROMIS scores and repair characteristics (hardware characteristics [screw length and diameter] and radiographic measurements of specific morphometric features). T tests determined the relationship between repair characteristics, PROMIS scores, and incidence of operative complications. PROMIS scores and correlation coefficients were also stratified by gender.

RESULTS

The average screw length and diameter adhered to guidelines from our previous study. Preoperatively, mean PROMIS PI = 57.26±11.03 and PROMIS PF = 42.27±15.45 after injury. Postoperatively, PROMIS PI = 44.15±7.36 and PROMIS PF = 57.22±10.93. Patients with complications had significantly worse postoperative PROMIS PF scores (p=0.0151) and PROMIS PI scores (p=0.003) compared to patients without complications. Females had non-significantly worse preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores compared to males and had a higher complication rate (33 percent versus 21 percent, respectively). Metatarsus adductus angle was shown to exhibit a significant moderate inverse relationship with postoperative PROMIS PF scores in the overall cohort (r=-0.478; p=0.045). Metatarsus adductus angle (r=-0.606; p=0.008), lateral talo-1st metatarsal angle (r=-0.592; p=0.01), and medial cuneiform height (r=-0.529; p=0.024) demonstrated significant inverse relationships with change in PROMIS PF scores for the overall cohort. Within the male subcohort, significant relationships were found between the change in PROMIS PF and metatarsus adductus angle (r=-0.7526; p=0.005), lateral talo-1st metatarsal angle (r=-0.7539; p=0.005), and medial cuneiform height (r=-0.627; p=0.029).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated according to guidelines from our prior study achieved satisfactory patient reported and radiographic outcomes. Screws larger than 4.5mm did not lead to hardware complications, including screw failure, iatrogenic fractures, or cortical blowouts. Females had non-significantly lower preoperative and postoperative PROMIS scores and were more likely to suffer complications compared to males. Patients with complications, higher arched feet, or greater metatarsus adductus angles had worse functional outcomes. Future studies should better characterize whether patients with excessive lateral column loading benefit from an off-loading cavus orthotic or plantar-lateral plating.

摘要

背景

由于非愈合风险增加,通常采用髓内固定治疗第 2 区和第 3 区第五跖骨骨折。我们小组之前进行了一项三维(3D)计算机断层(CT)成像研究,确定螺钉应止于跖骨弓且应大于常用的 4.5 毫米(mm)螺钉。本研究通过使用患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)身体功能(PF)和疼痛干扰(PI)调查来确定这些指南如何转化为手术结果。还获得了测量内侧纵弓高度和跖骨内收度的放射学变量,以确定这些测量值是否对结果有任何影响。最后,本研究旨在确定男性和女性之间的形态差异是否会影响手术结果。

方法

我们回顾性确定了符合纳入标准的 23 名患者(14 名男性,9 名女性)。18 名患者完成了 PROMIS 调查。术前 PROMIS 调查在手术前完成,而不是回顾性完成。还获得了负重位 X 线片,以协助手术计划,并在术后评估间隔愈合情况。计算了 PROMIS 评分与修复特征(硬件特征[螺钉长度和直径]和特定形态特征的放射学测量值)之间的相关系数。T 检验确定了修复特征、PROMIS 评分和手术并发症发生率之间的关系。还按性别对 PROMIS 评分和相关系数进行分层。

结果

平均螺钉长度和直径符合我们之前研究的指南。术前,平均 PROMIS PI = 57.26±11.03 和 PROMIS PF = 42.27±15.45 受伤后。术后,PROMIS PI = 44.15±7.36 和 PROMIS PF = 57.22±10.93。与无并发症的患者相比,有并发症的患者术后 PROMIS PF 评分(p=0.0151)和 PROMIS PI 评分(p=0.003)明显更差。与男性相比,女性术前和术后的 PROMIS 评分均无显著降低,且并发症发生率更高(分别为 33%和 21%)。跖骨内收角在总体队列中与术后 PROMIS PF 评分呈显著中度负相关(r=-0.478;p=0.045)。跖骨内收角(r=-0.606;p=0.008)、外踝-第 1 跖骨角(r=-0.592;p=0.01)和内侧楔骨高度(r=-0.529;p=0.024)与总体队列中 PROMIS PF 评分的变化呈显著负相关。在男性亚组中,发现 PROMIS PF 评分变化与跖骨内收角(r=-0.7526;p=0.005)、外踝-第 1 跖骨角(r=-0.7539;p=0.005)和内侧楔骨高度(r=-0.627;p=0.029)之间存在显著关系。

结论

根据我们之前研究的指南治疗的患者获得了满意的患者报告和放射学结果。大于 4.5mm 的螺钉不会导致硬件并发症,包括螺钉失败、医源性骨折或皮质爆裂。与男性相比,女性术前和术后的 PROMIS 评分均无显著降低,且更容易发生并发症。有并发症、足弓较高或跖骨内收角度较大的患者功能结局较差。未来的研究应更好地描述是否过度外侧柱负重的患者受益于减压高弓足矫形器或跖侧-外侧钢板。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/981d/7986515/856575b7667d/13018_2021_2331_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

2
Radiographic study of the fifth metatarsal for optimal intramedullary screw fixation of Jones fracture.
Foot Ankle Int. 2015 Mar;36(3):293-301. doi: 10.1177/1071100714553467. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
3
Predictors of Malreduction in Zone II and III Fifth Metatarsal Fractures Fixed With an Intramedullary Screw.
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Dec;41(12):1537-1545. doi: 10.1177/1071100720947411. Epub 2020 Aug 14.
4
Multiplanar CT Analysis of Fifth Metatarsal Morphology: Implications for Operative Management of Zone II Fractures.
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 May;37(5):528-36. doi: 10.1177/1071100715623041. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
5
Operative Treatment of Fifth Metatarsal Jones Fractures (Zones II and III) in the NBA.
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 May;37(5):488-500. doi: 10.1177/1071100715625290. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
6
Return to Weightbearing and High-Impact Activities Following Jones Fracture Intramedullary Screw Fixation.
Foot Ankle Int. 2020 Apr;41(4):379-386. doi: 10.1177/1071100719898278. Epub 2020 Jan 6.
7
A retrospective review of the effect of metatarsus adductus on healing time in the fifth metatarsal jones fracture.
Foot (Edinb). 2015 Dec;25(4):215-9. doi: 10.1016/j.foot.2015.05.006. Epub 2015 May 22.
8
A Biomechanical Comparison of Fifth Metatarsal Jones Fracture Fixation Methods.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1220-1227. doi: 10.1177/0363546517753376. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
9
Patient-Reported Outcomes and Radiographic Assessment in Primary and Revision Stage II, III, and IV Progressive Collapsing Foot Deformity Surgery.
Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021 Feb 22;6(1):2473011421992111. doi: 10.1177/2473011421992111. eCollection 2021 Jan.
10
The association of metatarsus adductus to the proximal fifth metatarsal Jones fracture.
J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012 Nov-Dec;51(6):739-42. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of operative and non-operative management of fifth metatarsal base fracture: A meta-analysis.
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0237151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237151. eCollection 2020.
2
The Correlation Between PROMIS Pain Interference and VAS Pain in Ambulatory Orthopedic Patients.
Orthopedics. 2018 Nov 1;41(6):e813-e819. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20180912-06. Epub 2018 Sep 18.
3
Treatment of Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures and Refractures With Plantar Plating in Elite Athletes.
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Dec;39(12):1410-1415. doi: 10.1177/1071100718791835. Epub 2018 Aug 6.
5
A Biomechanical Comparison of Fifth Metatarsal Jones Fracture Fixation Methods.
Am J Sports Med. 2018 Apr;46(5):1220-1227. doi: 10.1177/0363546517753376. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
6
Intramedullary Screw Fixation of a Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Stress Fracture in an Elite Athlete: A Case Report.
Surg J (N Y). 2017 Mar 17;3(1):e6-e8. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1599833. eCollection 2017 Jan.
7
Zone II and III fifth metatarsal fractures in athletes.
Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2017 Mar;10(1):86-93. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9388-5.
8
Proximal Fifth Metatarsal Fractures: Anatomy, Classification, Treatment and Complications.
Arch Trauma Res. 2016 Jun 13;5(4):e33298. doi: 10.5812/atr.33298. eCollection 2016 Dec.
9
Preoperative PROMIS Scores Predict Postoperative Success in Foot and Ankle Patients.
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 Sep;37(9):911-8. doi: 10.1177/1071100716665113. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
10
Multiplanar CT Analysis of Fifth Metatarsal Morphology: Implications for Operative Management of Zone II Fractures.
Foot Ankle Int. 2016 May;37(5):528-36. doi: 10.1177/1071100715623041. Epub 2015 Dec 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验