Oscar Langendorff Institute of Physiology, Rostock University Medical Center, Germany.
Institute of Applied Microelectronics and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, University of Rostock, Germany.
Neurobiol Dis. 2021 Jul;154:105341. doi: 10.1016/j.nbd.2021.105341. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
Pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an important option for patients with severe dystonias, which are thought to arise from a disturbance in striatal control of the globus pallidus internus (GPi). The mechanisms of GPi-DBS are far from understood. Although a disturbance of striatal function is thought to play a key role in dystonia, the effects of DBS on cortico-striatal function are unknown. We hypothesised that DBS, via axonal backfiring, or indirectly via thalamic and cortical coupling, alters striatal function. We tested this hypothesis in the dt hamster, an animal model of inherited generalised, paroxysmal dystonia. Hamsters (dystonic and non-dystonic controls) were bilaterally implanted with stimulation electrodes in the GPi. DBS (130 Hz), and sham DBS, were performed in unanaesthetised animals for 3 h. Synaptic cortico-striatal field potentials, as well as miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (mEPSC) and firing properties of medium spiny striatal neurones were recorded in brain slice preparations obtained immediately after EPN-DBS. The main findings were as follows: a. DBS increased cortico-striatal evoked responses in healthy, but not in dystonic tissue. b. Commensurate with this, DBS increased inhibitory control of these evoked responses in dystonic, and decreased inhibitory control in healthy tissue. c. Further, DBS reduced mEPSC frequency strongly in dystonic, and less prominently in healthy tissue, showing that also a modulation of presynaptic mechanisms is likely involved. d. Cellular properties of medium-spiny neurones remained unchanged. We conclude that DBS leads to dampening of cortico-striatal communication, and restores intrastriatal inhibitory tone.
苍白球内侧部深部脑刺激(DBS)是严重肌张力障碍患者的重要选择,这些患者被认为是由于纹状体对苍白球 internus(GPi)的控制失调引起的。GPi-DBS 的机制还远未被理解。尽管纹状体功能障碍被认为在肌张力障碍中起着关键作用,但 DBS 对皮质-纹状体功能的影响尚不清楚。我们假设 DBS 通过轴突反向放电,或间接通过丘脑和皮质耦合,改变纹状体功能。我们在遗传性全身性、阵发性肌张力障碍的 dt 仓鼠动物模型中检验了这一假设。仓鼠(肌张力障碍和非肌张力障碍对照)双侧植入 GPi 刺激电极。在未麻醉动物中进行 3 小时的 DBS(130 Hz)和假 DBS。在获得的脑切片制备物中记录突触皮质-纹状体场电位以及微小兴奋性突触后电流(mEPSC)和中间纹状体神经元的放电特性。主要发现如下:a. DBS 增加了健康组织中的皮质-纹状体诱发反应,但在肌张力障碍组织中没有增加。b. 与此一致,DBS 增加了肌张力障碍组织中这些诱发反应的抑制控制,而降低了健康组织中的抑制控制。c. 此外,DBS 强烈降低了肌张力障碍组织中 mEPSC 的频率,而在健康组织中则降低得较少,表明也可能涉及到对突触前机制的调节。d. 中间纹状体神经元的细胞特性保持不变。我们得出结论,DBS 导致皮质-纹状体通讯减弱,并恢复了纹状体内部的抑制性音调。