Suppr超能文献

前列腺癌:菲律宾和美国男性在根治性前列腺切除术中的临床病理预后因素表现。

Prostate cancer: a presentation of clinicopathologic prognosticators among Filipino and American men at radical prostatectomy.

机构信息

Institute of Pathology, St. Luke's Medical Center-Global City, Taguig, Metro Manila 1634, Philippines.

Department of Pathology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

出版信息

Asian J Androl. 2021 Sep-Oct;23(5):516-519. doi: 10.4103/aja.aja_9_21.

Abstract

Lower incidence and mortality rates from prostate cancer (PCa) have been shown in Asian men in general compared to Westerners. This is the first study detailing the clinicopathologic features of resected prostate cancer in Filipino men living in the Philippines (PH). This study investigated the supposed "lower risk" Filipino and "higher risk" American PCa patients from the PH and the United States of America (USA), respectively. We examined 348 (176 from PH, 172 from USA) radical prostatectomy cases. The clinicopathologic features of both groups (age at time of diagnosis, preoperative prostate-specific antigen [pre-op PSA] level, Gleason score [GS], Grade groups [GG], margin involvement, extraprostatic extension [EPE], seminal vesicle invasion [SVI], and regional lymph node [RLN] metastasis) were compared. Six of seven prognosticators examined were more strongly associated with Filipinos than with Americans. Filipinos were older at diagnosis (PH: 64.32 ± 6.56 years vs USA: 58.98 ± 8.08 years) and had higher pre-op PSA levels (PH: 21.39 ± 46.40 ng ml vs USA: 7.63 ± 9.19 ng ml). Filipino men had more advanced grade, GG 2 with minor pattern 5 (PH: 6.2% vs USA: 2.9%) and GG 5 (PH: 14.8% vs USA: 3.5%). Likewise, other adverse pathological features in margin positivity (PH: 52.3% vs USA: 23.8%), focal EPE (PH: 14.2% vs USA: 2.3%), and SVI (PH: 17.1% vs USA: 5.8%) were more commonly observed in Filipinos. This study reveals the prognostic disadvantage of Filipinos versus Americans and highlights an important difference of Filipinos from other studied Asian ethnicities that have repeatedly been shown to have lower-risk PCa. This study, the first on Filipino PCa patients with RP, suggests the need to modify Western-based risk stratification when employed in other countries like the PH.

摘要

与西方人相比,亚洲男性的前列腺癌(PCa)发病率和死亡率普遍较低。这是第一项详细描述菲律宾男性前列腺癌切除术后临床病理特征的研究,这些男性居住在菲律宾(PH)。本研究分别调查了 PH 和美利坚合众国(USA)中所谓的“低风险”菲律宾人和“高风险”美国人 PCa 患者。我们检查了 348 例(PH 组 176 例,USA 组 172 例)根治性前列腺切除术病例。比较了两组的临床病理特征(诊断时的年龄、术前前列腺特异性抗原[pre-op PSA]水平、Gleason 评分[GS]、分级组[GG]、边缘受累、前列腺外扩展[EPE]、精囊侵犯[SVI]和区域淋巴结[RLN]转移)。检查的七个预后因素中有六个与菲律宾人关系更密切,而与美国人关系不密切。菲律宾人诊断时年龄更大(PH:64.32±6.56 岁 vs USA:58.98±8.08 岁),术前 PSA 水平更高(PH:21.39±46.40ng/ml vs USA:7.63±9.19ng/ml)。菲律宾男性的 GG 分级更高,GG2 中有小形态 5(PH:6.2% vs USA:2.9%)和 GG5(PH:14.8% vs USA:3.5%)。同样,边缘阳性(PH:52.3% vs USA:23.8%)、局灶性 EPE(PH:14.2% vs USA:2.3%)和 SVI(PH:17.1% vs USA:5.8%)等其他不良病理特征在菲律宾人中更为常见。本研究揭示了菲律宾人与美国人相比预后不利的情况,并强调了菲律宾人与其他研究的亚洲种族之间的重要差异,这些亚洲种族的 PCa 一直被认为风险较低。本研究是第一项关于菲律宾前列腺癌患者接受 RP 的研究,表明在 PH 等其他国家使用西方风险分层时需要进行修改。

相似文献

2
Contemporary Pathological Stage Distribution After Radical Prostatectomy in North American High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients.
Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022 Oct;20(5):e380-e389. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 21.
3
Outcome after radical prostatectomy with a pretreatment prostate biopsy Gleason score of >/=8.
BJU Int. 2003 Oct;92(6):539-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2003.04419.x.

本文引用的文献

1
Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):394-424. doi: 10.3322/caac.21492. Epub 2018 Sep 12.
2
Clinical and histopathological characteristics of patients with prostate cancer in the BioBank Japan project.
J Epidemiol. 2017 Mar;27(3S):S65-S70. doi: 10.1016/j.je.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Feb 17.
4
Grading of prostatic adenocarcinoma: current state and prognostic implications.
Diagn Pathol. 2016 Mar 9;11:25. doi: 10.1186/s13000-016-0478-2.
5
The incidence and mortality of prostate cancer and its relationship with development in Asia.
Prostate Int. 2015 Dec;3(4):135-40. doi: 10.1016/j.prnil.2015.09.001. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
7
A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score.
Eur Urol. 2016 Mar;69(3):428-35. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.06.046. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
8
Current Histopathologic and Molecular Characterisations of Prostate Cancer: Towards Individualised Prognosis and Therapies.
Eur Urol. 2016 Feb;69(2):186-90. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.05.041. Epub 2015 Jun 10.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验