Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Aug 18;23(9):1559-1566. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntab049.
As the FDA works to determine whether a nicotine reduction policy would benefit public health, one key question is whether to mandate an immediate or gradual reduction in nicotine levels in cigarettes. The aim of this study was to determine whether the effects of gradual versus immediate nicotine reduction on cigarettes per day (CPD), total nicotine equivalents, and subjective responses differed in younger adults versus older adults.
Using data from a recent randomized trial conducted in the United States (N = 1250) that switched smokers over a 20-week period to very low nicotine content (VLNC) cigarettes either immediately, gradually (via monthly reductions in nicotine content), or not at all (control condition, normal nicotine content research cigarette), we analyzed the moderating effect of age (age 18-24 or 25+).
For both age groups, CPD in the immediate condition was significantly lower relative to gradual condition (estimated mean difference of 6.3 CPD in young adults, 5.2 CPD in older adults; p's < .05). Younger and older adults in the immediate and gradual reduction conditions had lower total nicotine equivalents at Week 20 (all p's < .05) than those in the control condition; age group did not moderate this effect. Positive subjective responses to cigarettes were lower among young adults relative to older adults in the immediate condition.
These results indicate that an immediate reduction in nicotine would result in beneficial effects in both young and older adults. Young adults show less positive subjective effects of smoking following switching to VLNC cigarettes relative to older adults.
As researchers work to understand how a potential reduced-nicotine product standard for cigarettes may affect public health, one question is whether nicotine should be reduced immediately or gradually. This study demonstrates that both young and older adults who were switched immediately to the lowest content of nicotine smoked fewer CPD and had lower nicotine intake than those in the gradual condition. Furthermore, young adults appear to show lower positive subjective effects following switching to VLNC cigarettes relative to older adults. This is consistent with previous work demonstrating that young people appear to show lower abuse liability for VLNC cigarettes.
随着 FDA 努力确定减少尼古丁政策是否有益于公众健康,一个关键问题是是否需要强制立即或逐步降低香烟中的尼古丁水平。本研究旨在确定在年轻人和老年人中,逐渐降低与立即降低尼古丁对每天吸烟量 (CPD)、总尼古丁等效物和主观反应的影响是否存在差异。
利用最近在美国进行的一项随机试验的数据(N = 1250),该试验在 20 周内将吸烟者转换为极低尼古丁含量(VLNC)香烟,要么立即转换,要么逐步转换(通过每月降低尼古丁含量),要么根本不转换(对照条件,正常尼古丁含量研究香烟),我们分析了年龄(18-24 岁或 25 岁以上)的调节作用。
对于两个年龄组,立即条件下的 CPD 明显低于逐步条件(年轻人的估计平均差异为 6.3 CPD,老年人为 5.2 CPD;p 值均<.05)。立即和逐步降低组的年轻人和老年人在第 20 周的总尼古丁当量较低(所有 p 值均<.05),而对照组则较高;年龄组并未调节此影响。与逐步条件相比,立即条件下的年轻人对香烟的正面主观反应较低。
这些结果表明,立即降低尼古丁含量将对年轻人和老年人都产生有益的影响。与老年人相比,转换为 VLNC 香烟后,年轻人对吸烟的正面主观影响较小。
随着研究人员努力了解潜在的降低香烟尼古丁标准可能如何影响公众健康,一个问题是尼古丁是否应立即或逐步降低。本研究表明,立即转换为最低尼古丁含量的年轻人和老年人比逐步条件下的人吸烟量更少,尼古丁摄入量更低。此外,与老年人相比,年轻人在转换为 VLNC 香烟后似乎表现出较低的正面主观影响。这与之前的工作一致,即年轻人对 VLNC 香烟的滥用倾向似乎较低。