Janaka Sanath Kumar, Clark Natasha M, Evans David T, Connor Joseph P
medRxiv. 2021 Mar 11:2021.03.08.21253135. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.08.21253135.
The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV2 that causes COVID-19 has resulted in the death of more than 2.5 million people, but no cure exists. Although passive immunization with COVID-19 convalescent plasma (CCP) provides a safe and viable therapeutic option, the selection of optimal units for therapy in a timely fashion remains a barrier.
Since virus neutralization is a necessary characteristic of plasma that can benefit recipients, the neutralizing titers of plasma samples were measured using a retroviral-pseudotype assay. Binding antibody titers to the spike (S) protein were also determined by a clinically available serological assay (Ortho-Vitros total IG), and an in-house ELISA. The results of these assays were compared to a measurement of antibodies directed to the receptor binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV2 S protein (Promega Lumit Dx).
All measures of antibodies were highly variable, but correlated, to different degrees, with each other. However, the anti-RBD antibodies correlated with viral neutralizing titers to a greater extent than the other antibody assays.
Our observations support the use of an anti-RBD assay such as the Lumit Dx assay, as an optimal predictor of the neutralization capability of CCP.
导致新冠肺炎的新型冠状病毒SARS-CoV-2已造成超过250万人死亡,且尚无治愈方法。尽管采用新冠康复者血浆(CCP)进行被动免疫提供了一种安全可行的治疗选择,但及时选择最佳治疗单位仍然是一个障碍。
由于病毒中和是能使受者受益的血浆的必要特性,因此使用逆转录病毒假型测定法测量血浆样本的中和滴度。还通过临床可用的血清学测定法(Ortho-Vitros总免疫球蛋白)和内部酶联免疫吸附测定法确定与刺突(S)蛋白的结合抗体滴度。将这些测定结果与针对SARS-CoV-2 S蛋白受体结合域(RBD)的抗体测量结果(普洛麦格Lumit Dx)进行比较。
所有抗体测量值变化很大,但在不同程度上相互关联。然而,抗RBD抗体与病毒中和滴度的相关性比其他抗体测定法更强。
我们的观察结果支持使用如Lumit Dx测定法这样的抗RBD测定法,作为CCP中和能力的最佳预测指标。